enquirer.com

News
Front Page
Local
Sports
-Bengals
-Reds
-Bearcats
-Xavier
Business
Weather
Traffic
Back Issues
AP Wire
-World
-Nation
-Sports
-Business
-Arts
-Health

Classifieds
Jobs
Autos
General
Obits
Homes

Freetime
TV Listings
Movies
Dining
Calendars
Weekend

Opinion
Columns
Borgman

GoCinci
HelpDesk
Feedback
Circulation
Subscribe
Phone #'s
Search

E N Q U I R E R   L O C A L   N E W S   C O V E R A G E
Proficiency tests at center of education debate

Thursday, July 23, 1998

BY DANA DiFILIPPO
The Cincinnati Enquirer

Supporters say proficiency tests are a valuable measure of students' academic progress, and an important accountability tool.

Critics complain that they take away instruction time and force teachers to teach to the test, rather than teaching for learning's sake.

The debate about standardized tests' merit continues as test mania grips the country, with many parents and educators more concerned about test scores than learning retention, said Grant Wiggins, who heads a Pennington, N.J., educational assessment group.

"Assessment tests are not unnecessary; rather, they have an unexpected and unwanted impact on teaching," said Mr. Wiggins, president of the Center on Learning, Assessment and School Structure. "Policy makers don't understand that we need work that is worth getting better at, rather than teaching to simplistic tests."

But others, such as program director Gary Huggins of the Washington, D.C.-based Center for Education Reform, stand firm in their support of standardized testing.

"States ought to set high and meaningful standards about what children should know and when they're supposed to know it," he said. "And meaningful standards are inseparable from assessments."

Twenty-one states require students to pass an achievement test to graduate; another six states are developing standards and tests, according to the Council of Chief State School Officers of Washington, D.C.

Educators often become frustrated with the pressure for students to test well.

"The public likes to compare districts, and districts are so dependent upon the public for operating dollars that they have no option other than to concentrate on the tests," Cincinnati Public Schools Superintendent J. Michael Brandt said.

Ohio's proficiency tests also disrupt class time, Mr. Brandt said. Students spend several hours on each of the test's five sections; the test is administered over several days.

North College Hill Superintendent Stanley Wernz agreed: "We spend so much time being tested that we have lost time for instruction."

Bernie Mixon contributed to this report.



Local Headlines For Thursday, July 23, 1998

3 stabbed outside show at Riverbend
Asst. city manager sets priorities
Bells will ring in Middletown
Broadway Commons backers near 26,800 target
Classrooms to get more disabled
Clinton signs IRS reforms, lauds Portman, Kerrey
Coach & Four's doors open
GOP blasts Clinton for education reform veto
If only we could be so ... artistic
Judge gives OK to heart case deal
Modernizing the little red schoolhouse
More primary students pass tests
More thunderstorms, stifling heat expected
Music fest sings sweet green tune
New signs will point drivers to interstates
No winner of $126.8M Powerball jackpot
Patton brings money to N. Ky.
Possibility of parole for cop-killer angers police
Proficiency tests at center of education debate
Retirees escape blaze in building
Stadiums play leapfrog
The pillar of strength behind "Samson'
Tower's controversy continues
TRISTATE DIGEST
Ujima festival faces lawsuit over name
Victim in fire died of stabbing
Woman links racy photos to Earl Ingels


 
Search | Questions/help | News tips | Letters to the editors
Web advertising | Place a classified | Subscribe | Circulation

Copyright 1995-2000. The Cincinnati Enquirer, a Gannett Co. Inc. newspaper.
Use of this site signifies agreement to terms of service updated 4/5/2000.