enquirer.com

News
Front Page
Local
Sports
-Bengals
-Reds
-Bearcats
-Xavier
Business
Health
Technology
Weather
Traffic
Back Issues
Photographs
AP Wire
-World
-Nation
-Sports
-Business
-Arts
-Health

Classifieds
Jobs
Autos
General
Obits
Homes

Freetime
Movies
Dining
Calendars
Weekend

Opinion
Columns
Borgman

GoCinci
HelpDesk
Feedback
Circulation
Subscribe
Phone #'s
Search

E N Q U I R E R   L O C A L   N E W S   C O V E R A G E
Case goes to the people

Saturday, September 12, 1998

BY PETE YOST
Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON -- Kenneth Starr's case against President Clinton has gone to the jury of the American people. The prosecutor's report lays out a tale of sex regarding Monica Lewinsky so lurid that several lawmakers called it disgusting.

The White House argued that a sexual affair is not enough to end a presidency. But there are allegations of a cover-up as well.

"This could be a make or break weekend for the president," Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., said as lawmakers flew off for a weekend of campaigning -- and a sampling of public opinion -- in their congressional districts.

MORE COVERAGE
  • Latest updates from Associated Press
  • Send a message to President Clinton
  • Text of the Starr Report
  • The President's rebuttal
  • Presidential Crisis: An AP Special Report
  • NOTE: Traffic will be heavy, so if servers are busy, try reloading.
  • Since the Lewinsky scandal broke in January, Clinton's popularity has remained high. But a poll taken a few hours after the House voted overwhelmingly to release Starr's report concluded that a growing number of Americans say the president should be impeached if he encouraged Ms. Lewinsky to lie about their relationship.

    An ABC News poll taken Friday evening says 57 percent think he should be impeached if he encouraged Ms. Lewinsky to lie about their relationship -- an increase of 14 points on that question since Aug. 21 and 6 percentage points since Wednesday. The poll placed the president's job approval rating at 56 percent, about where it was just before the report's release.

    Rep. Henry Hyde, the Illinois Republican who will lead the House Judiciary Committee's impeachment review, called the release of Starr's report "the beginning of a long climb up a steep mountain." "None of us look forward to it," he added.

    Clinton promised a vigorous defense against impeachment. Before Starr's report even came out, his lawyer fired off a rebuttal to the prosecutor's listing of 11 possible impeachable offenses ranging from lying under oath to obstructing justice. White House aides met into the night Friday to plan a new attack.

    Americans interviewed Friday continued to reflect a division of opinion on Clinton's actions.

    "We have a man who's supposed to represent the United States of America, and he's scum," said James Williams, 23, of Crandall, Texas.

    "Let him run the country," Steve McGinnis, 42, said in a Lincoln, Neb., bar. "I think he's doing a wonderful job. He made a mistake."

    "The amount of lurid, graphic detail here far exceeds any legitimate justification," said Clinton lawyer David Kendall.

    An affair, Kendall said, "is not a high crime or misdemeanor."

    The report graphically describes Ms. Lewinsky's version of 10 sexual encounters, including using a cigar as a sexual prop, phone sex sessions and even oral sex performed while Clinton spoke on the phone with members of Congress.

    Starr himself apologized in the report for its lengthy and explicit details of the encounters between the former intern and the president. But Starr contended it was necessary to prove Clinton committed perjury -- both in the Paula Jones sexual harassment lawsuit against him last January and again in his grand jury appearance last month.

    Clinton testified Aug. 17 to the grand jury that he had been "legally accurate" when he told Mrs. Jones' lawyers he did not have sexual relations with Ms. Lewinsky. Clinton's DNA was found on the semen-stained dress that Ms. Lewinsky turned over to Starr in July, the report revealed.

    Lawmakers who began reading the report were aghast.

    "It's disgusting," said Rep. Tom Davis, R-Va.

    Some Democrats mirrored the White House view.

    "I don't think juicy tidbits should be the determining factor," said Rep. Albert Wynn, D-Md. "The bottom line is whether these are impeachable offenses. I think a lot remains to be seen at this point."

    Just how bad is Clinton's behavior?

    "This is very unpresidential," said Rep. Chris LaCivita, executive director of the Virginia GOP.

    Starr's report presented new information about Clinton and Ms. Lewinsky:

    • Clinton telephoned Ms. Lewinsky on Dec. 17 at 2 a.m. to say her name was on the witness list in the Jones case, Ms. Lewinsky testified.

    • Clinton told her she should say she visited the White House to see presidential secretary Betty Currie, Ms. Lewinsky said. She added that the president's use of this "misleading" story amounted to a continuation of a cover story they had already agreed on regarding their relationship.

    • Mrs. Currie told prosecutors she believed Clinton had twice summoned her to the Oval Office after his deposition in the Jones case because he "wanted her to agree with him" on his false testimony.

    • At a Dec. 31 breakfast, when Ms. Lewinsky told presidential confidant Vernon Jordan that she had drafts of notes to the president, Jordan said "Go home and make sure they're not there." Ms. Lewinsky testified that she understood Jordan was advising her to "throw away" any copies she had sent to the president. She went home and discarded some 50 draft notes. Jordan had been dispatched by Clinton to help Ms. Lewinsky find a job in New York City. When she got a position with Revlon, Clinton told Jordan, "Thank you very much," Jordan testified.

    • One Saturday last December, Ms. Lewinsky said she became "livid" when she arrived at the White House gate with gifts for the president, only to be told that he was with another young woman in the Oval Office. Ms. Lewinsky stormed off to a pay phone to call the president's secretary and complain. Prosecutors said Mrs. Currie, hands shaking and almost crying, then told the Secret Service officers at the gate that Clinton was "irate" that Ms. Lewinsky was told whom he was with. Ms. Lewinsky also complained to Clinton by telephone. He told her "it was none of my business ... what he was doing."

      The report says that Clinton told the Secret Service watch commander that "I hope you use your discretion." The watch commander interpreted that to mean that he was not going to say anything. The commander in turn told all the officers involved not to discuss the incident.

    Clinton broke off his sexual relationship with Ms. Lewinsky on May 24, 1997.

    But she met with Clinton on July 4th that year, the day after writing him a letter hinting she might reveal her relationship with him. Clinton scolded her, then soothed her by being "the most affectionate with me he'd ever been," Ms. Lewinsky testified.

    "He remarked ... that he wished he had more time for me. ... I just knew he was in love with me."



    Today's Starr Report Coverage

    Case goes to the people
    Clinton's job approval holds
    First lady appears calm, benign
    Lewinsky thought he might marry her
    Millions swamp Internet for news
    Partisan lines begin to emerge
    Shock spreads worldwide
    Starr's 11 grounds for impeachment
    TRISTATE OPINION
    What to say to your kids

    Friday's Starr Report Coverage

    Starr report alleges 11 grounds for impeachment, strategy of deception
    Lawmakers express disgust, shock
    Clinton's own words from his grand jury appearance
    House sets impeachment process in motion
    Lawmakers express disgust, shock
    Lewinsky recalls sex during lawmakers' phone calls
    Lewinsky: Clinton said they'd make "good team'
    Retrieving the gifts: an impeachment offense?


     
    Search | Questions/help | News tips | Letters to the editors
    Web advertising | Place a classified | Subscribe | Circulation

    Copyright 1995-2000. The Cincinnati Enquirer, a Gannett Co. Inc. newspaper.
    Use of this site signifies agreement to terms of service updated 4/5/2000.