enquirer.com

News
Front Page
Local
Sports
-Bengals
-Reds
-Bearcats
-Xavier
Business
Weather
Traffic
Back Issues
AP Wire
-World
-Nation
-Sports
-Business
-Arts
-Health

Classifieds
Jobs
Autos
General
Obits
Homes

Freetime
TV Listings
Movies
Dining
Calendars
Weekend

Opinion
Columns
Borgman

GoCinci
HelpDesk
Feedback
Circulation
Subscribe
Phone #'s
Search

E N Q U I R E R   L O C A L   N E W S   C O V E R A G E
Flynt jury selection could drag
Attorneys say process could take 3-4 weeks

Wednesday, November 11, 1998

BY DAN HORN
The Cincinnati Enquirer

Selecting a jury for Larry Flynt's obscenity case may take as long as the trial itself.

One of Mr. Flynt's attorneys, Paul Cambria, said Tuesday that defense attorneys and prosecutors will likely need three to four weeks to find 12 impartial jurors.

He said it will be a long, difficult task because so many potential jurors will have heard about the highly publicized case and many will have strong opinions about it.

"People seem to have very definite feelings about both sides," said Mr. Cambria. "They have feelings about Mr. Flynt, about the right to read, about free speech."

Mr. Cambria's comments came after a hearing before Hamilton County Common Pleas Judge Patrick Dinkelacker, who will oversee the Flynt brothers' trial in January.

The Hustler magazine publisher and his brother, Jimmy Flynt, face obscenity charges for selling sexually explicit videos at their downtown store.

The judge agreed jury selection could be difficult and asked attorneys on both sides to offer suggestions on how to speed it up. He said he has set aside about six weeks on his docket for the trial. Mr. Cambria said an expanded juror questionnaire could help weed out biased jurors before they even get to the courtroom.

By evaluating their written responses, he said, attorneys will be able to spend their time questioning only the jurors who really have a chance to make the final panel.

Mr. Cambria said jury selection consumed three weeks at Mr. Flynt's first trial. Mr. Flynt was convicted at that trial, but the verdict was later overturned on appeal. He returned to Cincinnati last year, declaring he wanted a rematch in court.

At the hearing Tuesday, Mr. Flynt's attorneys argued that the charges should be dismissed because Ohio's obscenity law is too restrictive and violates the standard set years ago by the U.S. Supreme Court.

Judge Dinkelacker said he would rule on the issue by Dec. 4.



Local Headlines For Wednesday, November 11, 1998

'Discovery' images on Web
60-mph gusts batter Tristate
Blacks protest at Miami U.
Chiquita case loses two more judges
Design a poster for 1999 Cammy Awards
Family, friends recall veterans
Flynt jury selection could drag
Getting older, getting active
Girl, 15, dies in house fire
Harrison ex-chief facing third trial
Housing plan questioned
How to help Mitch victims
Jury urges death penalty
Lebanon city manager quits
Memorial to honor veterans
New books offer advice on aging happily
Northsiders protest road project
Nude club can stay, appeals court rules
Schools aid Mission Honduras
Set-aside ruling to be appealed
TRISTATE DIGEST
Watts may oust Boehner


 
Search | Questions/help | News tips | Letters to the editors
Web advertising | Place a classified | Subscribe | Circulation

Copyright 1995-2000. The Cincinnati Enquirer, a Gannett Co. Inc. newspaper.
Use of this site signifies agreement to terms of service updated 4/5/2000.