enquirer.com

News
Front Page
Local
Sports
-Bengals
-Reds
-Bearcats
-Xavier
Business
Health
Technology
Weather
Traffic
Back Issues
Photographs
AP Wire
-World
-Nation
-Sports
-Business
-Arts
-Health

Classifieds
Jobs
Autos
General
Obits
Homes

Freetime
Movies
Dining
Calendars
Weekend

Opinion
Columns
Borgman

GoCinci
HelpDesk
Feedback
Circulation
Subscribe
Phone #'s
Search

E N Q U I R E R   L O C A L   N E W S   C O V E R A G E
Wednesday, February 17, 1999

Roosters have to go, court rules


New dawn may be quieter for neighbors

BY STEVE KEMME
The Cincinnati Enquirer

        MIDDLETOWN — Ohio's 12th District Court of Appeals has given the neighbors of a Reily Township rooster owner something to crow about.

        The appeals court Tuesday upheld a Butler County Common Pleas Court decision that declared the roosters a noise nuisance and restricted Bobby Webb to owning no more than five roosters.

        The number of his feathered friends at times has been as high as 100 since he moved to his 5-acre property south of Oxford three years ago and began raising roosters.

        Some of his neighbors have complained that the roosters' loud, constant crowing from sunrise to sunset makes it impossible for them to enjoy the outdoors or to keep their windows open in warm weather.

        “To limit him to five roosters on five acres in an agricultural zone is an extremely restrictive use of the property,” said Mr. Webb's attorney, James Cooney.

        Mr. Webb says he raises the roosters to show in competi tions at fairs. But in his 1998 decision on the case, Judge John Moser of Butler County Common Pleas Court said he believed Mr. Webb was raising the roosters for cockfighting, an activity that's illegal in Ohio. Mr. Webb has denied that.

        The legal scratching and clawing isn't over. Mr. Webb will take the case to the Ohio Supreme Court, Mr. Cooney said.

        “I can assure you that with the supporters he has, he's strong in his commitment,” he said. “There are some constitutional issues here. They're taking away his property rights without any just cause.”

        The joy the appeals court ruling brought to the three Butler County families who have fought Mr. Webb was tempered by the likelihood that he will appeal the decision.

        “We're thrilled,” said John Kogge, one of the people who filed a lawsuit against Mr. Webb. “But so far, it's a hollow victory. When he actually has to move his roosters off his property, then we will consider it a real victory.”

       



Taft faces life-or-death decision
Minister confident heaven awaits Berry
Prosecutor: Whipping daughter was murder
Ky. assembly could let Turfway add casino
Winburn pulls back electoral proposal
1,000 volunteer to search for Erica
Online therapy for MS
Teacher waives right to speedy trial
Uncle Sam wants dropouts, too
Flu cases below average
More foreheads showing ash cross
Riverfront tower landmark idea toppled
Top skater stays busy off the ice
Woman held on fake-ID charge
Couple appeal in fight for tot
Flynt trial could be delayed again
Judge says jury can hear murder suspect's statement
Museum celebrates posters
City to look at 12th Street plans
Fairfield schools aim higher on sixth-grade tests
Fire merger takes shape
Flaws found in planetarium deal
Landmark for Butler Co.
Local police talent recognized
Middletown board agrees to decide on mall plan
New bridge in Newport a challenge
Ohio 747 spot to get fixed early
Police: Man dodged 5 shots
Pride learned through a play
Regional vs. local focus of meeting
- Roosters have to go, court rules
Sergeant is evaluated
Teacher directs 7th-graders to link science and writing
TRISTATE DIGEST
Village seeks outside help on landfill
Water pact could curb annexation
YMCA plans to open four Dearborn Co. facilities


 
Search | Questions/help | News tips | Letters to the editors
Web advertising | Place a classified | Subscribe | Circulation

Copyright 1995-2000. The Cincinnati Enquirer, a Gannett Co. Inc. newspaper.
Use of this site signifies agreement to terms of service updated 4/5/2000.