enquirer.com

News
Front Page
Local
Sports
-Bengals
-Reds
-Bearcats
-Xavier
Business
Health
Technology
Weather
Traffic
Back Issues
Photographs
AP Wire
-World
-Nation
-Sports
-Business
-Arts
-Health

Classifieds
Jobs
Autos
General
Obits
Homes

Freetime
Movies
Dining
Calendars
Weekend

Opinion
Columns
Borgman

GoCinci
HelpDesk
Feedback
Circulation
Subscribe
Phone #'s
Search

E N Q U I R E R   L O C A L   N E W S   C O V E R A G E
Monday, February 22, 1999

Universal Social Security may hurt states, Taft says




BY PAUL BARTON
Enquirer Washington Bureau

        WASHINGTON — Social Security reform that calls for universal coverage of state and local employees would be a disaster for Ohio and other states where they are not now included, Gov. Bob Taft warned members of the National Governors' Association (NGA) on Sunday.

        Such a step, he said, could do nothing less than affect the financial solvency of public retirement systems in Ohio. “It's a huge impact,” Mr. Taft said.

        The issue of whether to extend Social Security coverage to state and local employees not now included is expected to receive considerable attention this year as White House and congressional efforts to address the long-term solvency of Social Security move forward.

        Some advocates of Social Security reform see it as a way to bring additional money to the system.

        In Ohio, more than 1.2 million state and local employees, public school teachers, police, firefighters, state troopers and other public employees stand to be affected.

        Mr. Taft worked behind the scenes Sunday at the NGA's winter meeting to gather signatures on a letter that he plans to present to President Clinton today when the governors meet with him at the White House.

        The governor said he is worried that various Social Security reform commissions over the past two years have recommended universal coverage of state and local employees.

        Fourteen states now have employees who are legally exempt from Social Security because they have public pension systems instead. Many of them, including Ohio, set up their public pension systems before Social Security was created.

        Bringing those estimated 5 million workers nationwide into the system would mean that both state government and the employees would have to start paying Social Security taxes. It is a 6.2 percent payroll tax.

        Ohio officials, representing one of the largest states affected by the issue, worry it would put a huge strain on state and local governments and could force them to reduce benefits in their retirement plans.

       



Tristate fast lanes surely make you lose your mind
Family narrowly avoids double tragedy
Ball fields replace VOA relay station
Retiring black teachers leave void
Oprah to feature missing girl's case
Help from above boosts corn crop
Minister returns to court in abuse
Memo details objections to Christmas holiday
She looks, talks, moves and smirks like Cher
Student, 25, on critical missing list
Tiny liver transplant patient goes home
Transplanting a baby liver
Callers can learn of jobs at airport
DeWine votes reflect Clinton
Mayor tries to revitalize flooded town
Milford minister joins council
Newport rolls out not-welcome mat
Ohio, Ky. aim to keep funds from tobacco suit
Parole harder to get in Ohio, says veteran board member
Rugrats upstage convention center opening
Taft sidesteps endorsing Kasich
TRISTATE DIGEST
- Universal Social Security may hurt states, Taft says


 
Search | Questions/help | News tips | Letters to the editors
Web advertising | Place a classified | Subscribe | Circulation

Copyright 1995-2000. The Cincinnati Enquirer, a Gannett Co. Inc. newspaper.
Use of this site signifies agreement to terms of service updated 4/5/2000.