enquirer.com

News
Front Page
Local
Sports
-Bengals
-Reds
-Bearcats
-Xavier
Business
Health
Technology
Weather
Traffic
Back Issues
Photographs
AP Wire
-World
-Nation
-Sports
-Business
-Arts
-Health

Classifieds
Jobs
Autos
General
Obits
Homes

Freetime
Movies
Dining
Calendars
Weekend

Opinion
Columns
Borgman

GoCinci
HelpDesk
Feedback
Circulation
Subscribe
Phone #'s
Search

E N Q U I R E R   L O C A L   N E W S   C O V E R A G E
Wednesday, March 31, 1999

Prosecutors to appeal ruling in Sess case




BY DAN HORN
The Cincinnati Enquirer

        Prosecutors will ask an appeals court to overturn a ruling that wiped out most of their case against former Cincinnati police officer John Sess.

        Special Prosecutor James Beaton said Tuesday a successful appeal is the only way he will be able to use crucial evidence that links Mr. Sess to planting drugs on a suspect.

        Judge Robert Ruehlman threw out the evidence Monday after hearing arguments from both sides in Hamilton County Common Pleas Court.

        The judge ruled that the evidence was “tainted” because it was gathered after Mr. Sess had been granted immunity from prosecution.

        Before giving a statement to police, the judge said, Mr. Sess signed a document that barred prosecutors from using his statement against him in court.

        Judge Ruehlman said prosecutors would not have been able to charge Mr. Sess if not for that statement.

        Therefore, he said, all evidence gathered from that point on is “tainted by the immunized statement.”

        Mr. Beaton said the decision “ef fectively terminated” the case because it eliminated nearly all of the evidence against the former officer.

        Mr. Sess, a 23-year veteran of the police division, lost his job shortly after he gave police his statement.

        Prosecutors say Mr. Sess admitted to planting marijuana on drug suspect Shadarle Ragan in 1984. Mr. Ragan, an admitted drug offender, pleaded guilty in the 1984 case.

        Mr. Beaton said he will appeal Judge Ruehlman's decision to the Ohio 1st District Court of Appeals.

        He said it could be more than six months before the court rules.

       



Teens' coins add up to pride, hope
Repeat DUI offender receives 28 years
Hit-run victim could go home soon
I-71 work draws outcry
Argosy underpaid taxes
Cincinnati fails to keep black doctors
Decision on Justin appeal could be made today
Shooting victim's family sues city, officers
Antifreeze causes fumes at high school
Big names push direct-elect mayor plan
Hamilton neighbors resent topless bar
McGuffey deserves stamp, too, fans say
Riverfront forums share single theme
Holocaust survivor writes of freedom
Pops moves into 2000 with diverse shows, stars
Shark invasion of Newport begins
I-Team chief did fine work at Channel 9
Mariemont youth dies in fall at gorge; alcohol suspected
Second dose of 'blue moons'
Callery to run for mayor in Covington
Church says it lacks information on body
Historic observatory in new hands
Job interview questions backed
No bond for suspect in girlfriend's slaying
- Prosecutors to appeal ruling in Sess case
Psychologist under review
Sculpture's message lost
Sense of identity sought for cities
Taft signs first law for 20,000 tutors
TRISTATE DIGEST
Trustees object to sign overload
UC to OK service workers' contract
Whippy Dip stirs Mason nostalgia


 
Search | Questions/help | News tips | Letters to the editors
Web advertising | Place a classified | Subscribe | Circulation

Copyright 1995-2000. The Cincinnati Enquirer, a Gannett Co. Inc. newspaper.
Use of this site signifies agreement to terms of service updated 4/5/2000.