enquirer.com

News
Front Page
Local
Sports
-Bengals
-Reds
-Bearcats
-Xavier
Business
Health
Technology
Weather
Traffic
Back Issues
Photographs
AP Wire
-World
-Nation
-Sports
-Business
-Arts
-Health

Classifieds
Jobs
Autos
General
Obits
Homes

Freetime
Movies
Dining
Calendars
Weekend

Opinion
Columns
Borgman

GoCinci
HelpDesk
Feedback
Circulation
Subscribe
Phone #'s
Search

E N Q U I R E R   L O C A L   N E W S   C O V E R A G E
Saturday, May 08, 1999

Ex-officer awaits verdict in sex case


Judge takes weekend to decide whether accusers are truthful

BY DAN HORN
The Cincinnati Enquirer

        A judge will decide Monday whether former Cincinnati Police Officer Patrick Knight is guilty of coercing women into sex by threatening to arrest them.

        After hearing nearly four weeks of testimony, Judge Robert Kraft said he will take a few days to review the evidence.

        The judge will decide the case himself because Mr. Knight chose to have a trial without a jury.

        In closing arguments Friday, attorneys on both sides repeated the claims they have made throughout the trial.

        Defense attorney Merlyn Shiver decker said the four women who accused Mr. Knight were drug addicts, alcoholics and admitted liars who were out to get the former officer.

        “There are some stories that are believable and there are some stories that aren't,” Mr. Shiverdecker told the judge. “This defies imagination.”

        But assistant prosecutor Chris McEvilley said Mr. Knight chose his victims because he knew no one would believe them.

        She said their stories cannot be dismissed simply because they have a history of run-ins with the law.

        “That's why he picked them,” Ms. McEvilley said. “The question now, Your Honor, is who are you going to believe?”

        Mr. Knight is charged with sexual battery and bribery involving four women he allegedly picked up while on duty and coerced or attempted to coerce into sex.

        Judge Kraft this week threw out a bribery charge involving one of the women after Mr. Shiverdecker argued she had misidentified Mr. Knight in court.

        Mr. Shiverdecker said many other inconsistencies in testimony and evidence suggest the other women also should not be trusted.

        “There is no reason to believe them,” he said. “They sing a different song every time.”

        Ms. McEvilley said the judge must consider that four different women who did not know one another told such similar stories.

        “There is only one explanation,” she said. “And that is, these four women are telling the truth.”

       



Segregation remains social shame
Paddle wheel could be part of river park
Rabbi admits theft charge
'Answers' faces money question
Jam-packed weekend underway
Jammin' is balmy, high value
Marathon will delay some traffic
Educators comforted by tip line
Ex-firefighter gets 10 years for kidnapping
Man walking on railroad track killed
Supremacist refuses to testify
GET TO IT
'Ex-mayor' Bowman will still be player
- Ex-officer awaits verdict in sex case
Glendale faces Nov. 2 levy vote
Kenton jailer drops chief deputy
Memorial to King sought
Mercy grows with pace of Fairfield
Minorities' health care panel's focus
Pen pals find faces behind names
Pianist displays finesse, charm
Rezoning decision due Monday
'Soft cuts' proposed to bolster county budget
TRISTATE DIGEST


 
Search | Questions/help | News tips | Letters to the editors
Web advertising | Place a classified | Subscribe | Circulation

Copyright 1995-2000. The Cincinnati Enquirer, a Gannett Co. Inc. newspaper.
Use of this site signifies agreement to terms of service updated 4/5/2000.