enquirer.com

News
Front Page
Local
Sports
-Bengals
-Reds
-Bearcats
-Xavier
Business
Health
Technology
Weather
Traffic
Back Issues
Photographs
AP Wire
-World
-Nation
-Sports
-Business
-Arts
-Health

Classifieds
Jobs
Autos
General
Obits
Homes

Freetime
Movies
Dining
Calendars
Weekend

Opinion
Columns
Borgman

GoCinci
HelpDesk
Feedback
Circulation
Subscribe
Phone #'s
Search

E N Q U I R E R   L O C A L   N E W S   C O V E R A G E
Friday, June 04, 1999

Treatment plant site a surprise


Boone County decides on land known as 15A

BY KRISTINA GOETZ
The Cincinnati Enquirer

        FORT WRIGHT — Some Boone County residents were relieved and others stunned Thursday by the site selected for the new Western Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant.

        The decision that was a long time in the making came when board members of Sanitation District No. 1 voted unanimously Thursday on a site known as 15A.

        The location is between the Ohio River and Ky. 20 in northern Boone County, about 1.3 miles north of Burlington Pike. It is one of five sites the district considered for the plant.

        Donald Stites, a property owner on the site, said he was shocked.

        “I can't believe they selected us,” he said. “Three weeks ago, we weren't even a site; and now we're the best in the county.

        “I'm stunned by this strange decision that violates all previous plans. I wish I knew what was behind it.”

        Mr. Stites said he has no plans to sell the farmland that's been in his family for 50 years.

        The sanitation district must build a new sewage treatment plant in five years because the Dry Creek plant in Villa Hills, which treats waste from Boone, Kenton and Campbell counties, will be at capacity by 2003.

        District officials say it is not financially feasible to enlarge

        the Dry Creek facility.

        The Belleview Sand and Gravel property is on part of the chosen site, as well as a tree and shrub nursery and a farm. The exact location chosen could include one or more of the adjoining parcels owned by three families.

        “We'll be negotiating with all three of the property owners there,” said Jeff Eger, executive director for Sanitation District No. 1.

        “Somebody might want to sell, but the price might not be right; so we might have to look at another parcel.”

        Mr. Eger said the sanitation district would like to have 100 acres.

        Mary Rudicill, one of the property owners, said she was “just totally surprised, to be honest. I really thought they were leaning toward the CG&E plant.”

        Sanitation district employees visited her property, she said; but after community speculation that the choice would likely be elsewhere, she didn't think much more about it.

        “We're business people,” she said. “I'm certainly not going to say we'd never sell, but we had no desire to sell because it's my actual homeplace.”

        The sanitation district had been negotiating with Cinergy for a piece of its East Bend property, but after public opposition developed in Rabbit Hash, Cinergy broke off negotiations in February and said it was no longer interested in selling the land.

        There were several factors that distinguished the property that was chosen from the other sites, officials said.

        “We can eliminate a pump station, there are natural buffers and there is good access to the river,” board President Richard Kennedy said.

        By not building a large pump station planned for Gunpowder Creek, substantial costs for operation and maintenance would be eliminated.

        Board members also said initial appraisal estimates indicate the property can be bought well within the acquisition budget.

        The site will also have minimal impact on the public.

        Yvonne Edwards, a resident who opposed a possible site off Elijah Creek Road, said she was satisfied with the board's choice.

        “It seems like it's going in the right direction of the county,” she said.

        The Kentucky Division of Water is expected to review a detailed report of the costs and environmental implications of the project by 2000. It is estimated that the design of the plant could be finished by 2001 and construction started by 2002.

        The new plant should be operating by 2004.

       



They're not just guards - they're guardian angels
'Patient Protection' bill loses liability provision
Lawmaker says she got mixed signal
Worst-case toxic disaster risks revealed
Advice for judges: Curb your tongues
Country Day checked after threats
New area code may be necessary
Slain man's family awaits answers
Races disagree on police
Results no surprise locally
Stomping injured bird: Murder or mercy killing?
Art to cover base of fountain
Killing puzzles Clermont officials
Neighbors win long fight over landfill
A doctor who babies her patients
Law limits hours, places teens can work
School's out: Hurry up and rest
WVXU returns to its old format
GET TO IT
Bowling teaches kids discipline
Butler Co. in final running for plant
Chief sues city over 2nd dismissal
Confusion envelops beautification
Council awaits report on expanding Sabin center
Couple sentenced for tax evasion
Democrats hope picnic brings spark
Drug ring supplier receives 30 years
Family among 16 in drug indictments
Group still opposing light rail
Harrison hopes to lure business, shoppers
Methadone pits county, city
Middletown board seat to open up
Residents unsatisfied with mining company's reassurances
Residents protest early tax deadline
Signs of sin abound, Graham says
Skaters can't wait for park
- Treatment plant site a surprise
Trio invade Middletown home
TRISTATE DIGEST


 
Search | Questions/help | News tips | Letters to the editors
Web advertising | Place a classified | Subscribe | Circulation

Copyright 1995-2000. The Cincinnati Enquirer, a Gannett Co. Inc. newspaper.
Use of this site signifies agreement to terms of service updated 4/5/2000.