enquirer.com

News
Front Page
Local
Sports
-Bengals
-Reds
-Bearcats
-Xavier
Business
Health
Technology
Weather
Traffic
Back Issues
Photographs
AP Wire
-World
-Nation
-Sports
-Business
-Arts
-Health

Classifieds
Jobs
Autos
General
Obits
Homes

Freetime
Movies
Dining
Calendars
Weekend

Opinion
Columns
Borgman

GoCinci
HelpDesk
Feedback
Circulation
Subscribe
Phone #'s
Search

E N Q U I R E R   L O C A L   N E W S   C O V E R A G E
Saturday, June 26, 1999

Closed-door meeting on Shirey upheld


Judge rejects Enquirer challenge to council

BY DAN HORN
The Cincinnati Enquirer

        A judge will not stop Cincinnati City Council from meeting behind closed doors Monday to discuss the fate of City Manager John Shirey.

        Judge Thomas Nurre ruled Friday that the city's charter does not prevent council members from holding a private meeting to review the performance of the city manager.

        The Cincinnati Enquirer had asked the judge for a temporary restraining order that would block the meeting.

        At a hearing in Hamilton County Common Pleas Court, attorneys for the newspaper said the private ses sion would violate a provision of the charter that states the “proceedings of council shall be public.”

        “The public has a right to know what is going on in these closed-door sessions,” said R. Kent Wellington, an attorney for the newspaper.

        Although state law allows officials to hold private “executive sessions” to discuss some personnel and legal matters, Mr. Wellington argued that the city charter is more restrictive.

        He said the requirement that all proceedings “shall be public” forces city officials to open meetings that state law might otherwise have allowed them to keep private.

        The city, however, contends the charter includes language that permits council members to hold private sessions.

        Assistant City Solicitor Mark Yu rick said the charter distinguishes between “public proceedings” and “meetings.”

        He said the term “proceedings” refers to council votes and other public matters, while the term “meetings” refers to any number of other council activities that may or may not be held in public.

        “Clearly, there's a difference between proceedings and meetings,” Mr. Yurick said. “Proceedings have to be public but meetings don't.”

        Judge Nurre ruled that the charter does not rule out private sessions, making it legal for the city to hold a closed-door meeting to discuss Mr. Shirey's job status.

        Council members met Thursday to discuss the matter but adjourned after two hours. They said they would resume the meeting Monday.

       



Tornado stole a Cincinnati treasure: trees
Officers in shooting return to street duty
Three kids nearly drown
Rail killings suspect was held and let go
Powerball fever drives Ohioans across the river
Refugee family makes way to Tristate
Miami U tuition rise may be 6%
Plane crash spares pilot's life
Police dogs, trainers compete
Portman: Fix Social Security
Alexander: Look me over
Chevie Kehoe gets life for 3 murders
Classic cars strut proudly
- Closed-door meeting on Shirey upheld
Man trumps township in Wild West grave saga
New park gives home to skaters
Borge at 90: still deft, charming, hilarious
Fixer-uppers: Consider software before trip to hardware store
GET TO IT
Cancer survivors gather for ice cream and joy
Cinergy truck hit by train in Butler
Court upholds Cincinnati noise law
Day care rated as deficient in Ky.
Driver shot through window
Felled by stroke, young swimmer fights to recover
GOP gloats on getting Democrats
Mayor vs. council disputes derail Ludlow budget
Search for police chief postponed
Silverton pool opening delayed
TRISTATE DIGEST
Turfway head knows horses
Wyoming celebrates 125 years


 
Search | Questions/help | News tips | Letters to the editors
Web advertising | Place a classified | Subscribe | Circulation

Copyright 1995-2000. The Cincinnati Enquirer, a Gannett Co. Inc. newspaper.
Use of this site signifies agreement to terms of service updated 4/5/2000.