enquirer.com

News
Front Page
Local
Sports
-Bengals
-Reds
-Bearcats
-Xavier
Business
Health
Technology
Weather
Traffic
Back Issues
Photographs
AP Wire
-World
-Nation
-Sports
-Business
-Arts
-Health

Classifieds
Jobs
Autos
General
Obits
Homes

Freetime
Movies
Dining
Calendars
Weekend

Opinion
Columns
Borgman

GoCinci
HelpDesk
Feedback
Circulation
Subscribe
Phone #'s
Search

E N Q U I R E R   L O C A L   N E W S   C O V E R A G E
Thursday, July 01, 1999

City defends sting against 'nude interactive conduct'


Exotic dancer claims Constitution protects such acts

BY BEN L. KAUFMAN
The Cincinnati Enquirer

        “Nude interactive conduct” is not protected by the First Amendment, the city of Cincinnati argued this week in its motion to dismiss a suit by an exotic dancer.

        The suit was filed by Melissa Kelly, who danced and also managed Brittany's Exotic Dancers.

        She says police put her out of business with a sting involving some of the same officers who hired her dancers for their parties.

Overturned on appeal
        Ms. Kelly's conviction for promoting prostitution was overturned on appeal because of insufficient evidence. Her dancers' prostitution trials ended in acquittals.

        Ms. Kelly sued this year, and Assistant City Solicitor Richard Ganulin responded Tuesday that she was claiming First Amendment and privacy rights she did not have.

        Looking at what Ms. Kelly claimed was protected freedom of expression, Mr. Ganulin said Brittany's dancers:

        • Appeared to have had oral sex with each other although one employee said it was simulated.

        • Lap-danced on customers for about 10 seconds at a time and also rubbed customers' chests and thigh.

        Mr. Ganulin said those activities were not the kind of expressive conduct protected by the Constitution and Ms. Kelly cannot claim damages for alleged violations with her dancers' constitutional rights.

        “Whether or not the nude interactive conduct is prostitution under the laws of the state of Ohio, the sale of a service of that nature is beyond the outer perimeter of the 1st Amendment,” Mr. Ganulin said.

"Fun' of customer
        “A prostitute sells his or her services for the "fun' of the customer. (Ms. Kelly) sells her nude interactive conduct for the "fun' of the customer.

        “Neither a prostitute or Brittany's employees are brought within the protection of the First Amendment because customers are having "fun.'”

        He said nude dancing on a bar stage can be protected by the First Amendment but “the nude services that Brittany sells to a specific private customer, for that customer's private purposes” is not.

        Mr. Ganulin said nude interactive services have no constitutional protection from investigation as possible prostitution or other illegal activity.

        As far as Ms. Kelly's personal rights when she performed nude in teractive conduct, there is no evidence that authorities “infringed on her right to freedom of expression,” Mr. Ganulin said.

        Finally, Mr. Ganulin rejected the claim that police violated Ms. Kelly's constitutionally protected right to privacy by videotaping her nude interactive services.

        Mr. Ganulin said she performed among strangers in someone else's home and had no expectation of privacy.

        It could be months before the case is resolved.

       



County: Stadiums need auditor
Officer in fatal shooting resigns
$145M Powerball fuels frenzy here
Homeless have young faces
More grandchildren living with their grandparents
Sons' legacy lives on in new organ donor law
Two tax relief proposals before city
Ex-Chiquita lawyer's plea deal results in probation
Prayers, not blame, in near drowning
Boy accused of rape in juvenile jail
Deliveryman saves a life, but one lost
Did judge seek help in brother's case?
School board stops on a dime
District fears $19M cut on inventory tax
Textbook example of charity
Blessid Union has fan in Cindy
Center offers care outside medical mainstream
Cincinnati's Century of Change
Era ends as Ripley's Alive! closes doors
GET TO IT
Aiding aged was second career for retiring nun
Buckle up, win chance at big bucks
- City defends sting against 'nude interactive conduct'
Community center idea gets new life
Covington may look at day curfew
Cyanide cloud averted in Miami U. lab spill
Day camp lacks kids
Deerfield happy to see township protection bill pass
Expert says cancer blame misplaced
Fairfield's 'Carousel' a city hit
Hamilton police computerize prints
Kasich attacks business' breaks
Lawrenceburg signs deal on landmarks
Man gets prison for partly sinking Belle
Mental health agencies join to save funds
Murder defendant deemed fit for trial
New rates approved for Fountain Square garages
Pair arrested in robbery file suit against city, police and accusers
Public has say on Longbranch plan
Sharing van ride now a better deal
Spouse charged in stabbing
State lifting Silverton's fiscal watch
Taft makes last-minute review of $22.6B budget
Taxi driver charged in fatal crash
Tip leads police to drug arrests
TRISTATE DIGEST


 
Search | Questions/help | News tips | Letters to the editors
Web advertising | Place a classified | Subscribe | Circulation

Copyright 1995-2000. The Cincinnati Enquirer, a Gannett Co. Inc. newspaper.
Use of this site signifies agreement to terms of service updated 4/5/2000.