enquirer.com

News
Front Page
Local
Sports
-Bengals
-Reds
-Bearcats
-Xavier
Business
Health
Technology
Weather
Traffic
Back Issues
Photographs
AP Wire
-World
-Nation
-Sports
-Business
-Arts
-Health

Classifieds
Jobs
Autos
General
Obits
Homes

Freetime
Movies
Dining
Calendars
Weekend

Opinion
Columns
Borgman

GoCinci
HelpDesk
Feedback
Circulation
Subscribe
Phone #'s
Search

E N Q U I R E R   L O C A L   N E W S   C O V E R A G E
Thursday, July 01, 1999

Did judge seek help in brother's case?


Presentence letter raises ethics issue

BY TOM O'NEILL
The Cincinnati Enquirer

        A letter soliciting support for a former high school teacher who is to be sentenced for 44 counts of sexual battery on two female students has come to the attention of the Ohio Supreme Court disciplinary board because one of the people who signed it is a judge.

        Jack Walker could get life in prison when sentenced in Clermont County Common Pleas Court on Aug. 20 by visiting Judge George Elliott.

        Mr. Walker, a former teacher at Batavia High School, is the brother of Judge William Walker of Clermont County Common Pleas Court. The letter, obtained by The Cincinnati Enquirer from the Clermont County Sheriff's Department, is signed by Jack Walker's wife, Kay, sister Judy, and brothers Larry, Don and Bill.

        Don Walker, reached Wednesday, confirmed that the Bill Walker who signed it is the judge. He declined to comment further.

        The letter does not identify “Bill Walker” as a judge, nor is it written on official court stationery.

        Even so, if the judge signed the letter, it raises ethical questions, said Lori J. Brown, first assistant counsel for the state Supreme Court Office of Disciplinary Counsel.

        Canon 4A of the Code of Judicial Conduct, which addresses “the appearance of impropriety in all of the judge's activities,” says:

        “A judge shall not lend the prestige of judicial office to advance the private interests of the judge or others and shall not ... permit others to convey the impression that they are in a special position to influence the judge.”

        Judge Walker was unavailable for comment Wednesday.

        The letter is not addressed to anyone specifically. It apparently is being sent to those the Walkers think might still regard Jack Walker favorably.

        In it, the Walkers write: “Jack is experiencing deep remorse. He brought disgrace upon himself, inflicted pain upon those he cares about, and lost his teaching career.

        “So far, the judge has only been given a negative portrayal of Jack. It would be very helpful if a one-page letter favorable to Jack were received by the judge as a part of our pre-sentence filing due on July 30, 1999.”

        It urges the writer to “(a) identify who you are, (b) state how long you have known Jack and under what circumstances, (c) relate something positive or good that can be attributed to Jack, and (d) encourage in your own words leniency in sentencing.”

        The letter cites “the very important issue of whether or not he (Jack) is a "sexually violent predator.'” The criteria are that he be convicted of a sexually violent crime, a category in which sexual battery, a third-degree felony, is listed. The second is whether Judge Elliott rules he is likely to commit such an act again.

        If the judge does, Jack Walker would receive a two-years to life sentence — on each of the 44 counts.

        Judge Elliott was brought in from Warren County and prosecutor Rick Gibson from Hamilton County because of Judge Walker's position in the courts.

        Mr. Gibson confirmed he was aware of the letter, but said he would not comment on it until after sentencing.

        Mr. Walker's victims were students in his history and drama classes, and the sexual contact with one of the girls continued after she graduated.

       



County: Stadiums need auditor
Officer in fatal shooting resigns
$145M Powerball fuels frenzy here
Homeless have young faces
More grandchildren living with their grandparents
Sons' legacy lives on in new organ donor law
Two tax relief proposals before city
Ex-Chiquita lawyer's plea deal results in probation
Prayers, not blame, in near drowning
Boy accused of rape in juvenile jail
Deliveryman saves a life, but one lost
- Did judge seek help in brother's case?
School board stops on a dime
District fears $19M cut on inventory tax
Textbook example of charity
Blessid Union has fan in Cindy
Center offers care outside medical mainstream
Cincinnati's Century of Change
Era ends as Ripley's Alive! closes doors
GET TO IT
Aiding aged was second career for retiring nun
Buckle up, win chance at big bucks
City defends sting against 'nude interactive conduct'
Community center idea gets new life
Covington may look at day curfew
Cyanide cloud averted in Miami U. lab spill
Day camp lacks kids
Deerfield happy to see township protection bill pass
Expert says cancer blame misplaced
Fairfield's 'Carousel' a city hit
Hamilton police computerize prints
Kasich attacks business' breaks
Lawrenceburg signs deal on landmarks
Man gets prison for partly sinking Belle
Mental health agencies join to save funds
Murder defendant deemed fit for trial
New rates approved for Fountain Square garages
Pair arrested in robbery file suit against city, police and accusers
Public has say on Longbranch plan
Sharing van ride now a better deal
Spouse charged in stabbing
State lifting Silverton's fiscal watch
Taft makes last-minute review of $22.6B budget
Taxi driver charged in fatal crash
Tip leads police to drug arrests
TRISTATE DIGEST


 
Search | Questions/help | News tips | Letters to the editors
Web advertising | Place a classified | Subscribe | Circulation

Copyright 1995-2000. The Cincinnati Enquirer, a Gannett Co. Inc. newspaper.
Use of this site signifies agreement to terms of service updated 4/5/2000.