enquirer.com

News
Front Page
Local
Sports
-Bengals
-Reds
-Bearcats
-Xavier
Business
Health
Technology
Weather
Traffic
Back Issues
Photographs
AP Wire
-World
-Nation
-Sports
-Business
-Arts
-Health

Classifieds
Jobs
Autos
General
Obits
Homes

Freetime
Movies
Dining
Calendars
Weekend

Opinion
Columns
Borgman

GoCinci
HelpDesk
Feedback
Circulation
Subscribe
Phone #'s
Search

E N Q U I R E R   L O C A L   N E W S   C O V E R A G E
Wednesday, July 14, 1999

Former 'victim' says prosecutors can't call him assailant now




BY DAN HORN
The Cincinnati Enquirer

        John Maupin says prosecutors were more than happy to portray him as a victim in a criminal case two years ago. But now, he says, they're using the same case to make him out to be the bad guy.

        In a motion filed Tuesday in juvenile court, Mr. Maupin argues that the assault charges against him should be dismissed because prosecutors are unfairly twisting the evidence in his case.

        The case began in 1997 when Mr. Maupin, then 17, and two other teen-agers got into a fistfight outside Mr. Maupin's home.

        His attorney, Kenneth Lawson, said Mr. Maupin ex changed words with the other teens and then drove home. He said the other teens pursued his client and confronted him on his property.

        In the ensuing fight, he said, Mr. Maupin punched one of the teens, who fell and hit his head on the pavement.

        Mr. Maupin's motion claims police indicated he would not be charged because he acted in self-defense.

        But after pursuing menacing charges against the others, Mr. Lawson said, prosecutors filed assault charges against his client.

        He argues that prosecutors conceded Mr. Maupin acted in self-defense because that is the only way they could prove the menacing charges against the others.

        The motion also includes a sworn statement from a former assistant prosecutor, Joni Statzer, who claims it was a conflict of interest for prosecutors to pursue charges against Mr. Maupin while portraying him as a victim in the other case.

        “The prosecutor's office ... participated in what I believe to be the malicious pros ecution of (Mr. Maupin),” Ms. Statzer stated.

        Prosecutor Mike Allen said there is nothing to prevent his office from prosecuting both sides of a fight.

        Mr. Maupin was found guilty of assault last year but an appeals court overturned the conviction. The case now is pending again in juvenile court.

       



Vision calls for tower to light Covington square
Witnesses vanish; suspect walks
Drug courts offer reprieves in life
Elegant living to help fund affordable housing
Suspect in killings gives up in Sidney
Railroad killings suspect in custody
Sidney says goodbye to slain teen-agers
Coach brought glory to city
Gunman holds police at bay
What women need to know about heart attacks
Kasich will bow to Bush
GET TO IT
Miss Piggy squeals about her new movie
$50K pledged to fight crime
Airport land called suitable for sewage plant
Century-old bridge will be replaced
City hopes to sweep away litter, leave pride behind
Clermont considers adding drug court, but not soon
Covington teen charged with arson
Embarrassment, job loss ruled risks of controversy
Ex-bus driver now transportation boss
Former jail officer's trial on sex charges postponed
Former principal moving up
- Former 'victim' says prosecutors can't call him assailant now
Juvenile, other Newport crime mostly down
Lebanon approves tax deal to bring in 45 jobs
Loveland looks to Indy for bike ideas
Middletown/Monroe to seek levy
Middletown picks team for project
Museum is one man's praise of past
Norwood ready to flaunt itself with summer bash
Ohio sheriff is convicted in mob-link case
Schools taking time-outs to help educators improve
TRISTATE DIGEST
Warren Co. bosses get OK of early 'wish lists'
Warren rejects sewer proposal
Who was driver? Hair, blood taken from wreck


 
Search | Questions/help | News tips | Letters to the editors
Web advertising | Place a classified | Subscribe | Circulation

Copyright 1995-2000. The Cincinnati Enquirer, a Gannett Co. Inc. newspaper.
Use of this site signifies agreement to terms of service updated 4/5/2000.