enquirer.com

News
Front Page
Local
Sports
-Bengals
-Reds
-Bearcats
-Xavier
Business
Health
Technology
Weather
Traffic
Back Issues
Photographs
AP Wire
-World
-Nation
-Sports
-Business
-Arts
-Health

Classifieds
Jobs
Autos
General
Obits
Homes

Freetime
Movies
Dining
Calendars
Weekend

Opinion
Columns
Borgman

GoCinci
HelpDesk
Feedback
Circulation
Subscribe
Phone #'s
Search

E N Q U I R E R   L O C A L   N E W S   C O V E R A G E
Thursday, August 26, 1999

Weapons unlikely to be burned


Alternatives looking better, official says

The Associated Press

        LEXINGTON, Ky. — The chairman of a federal panel investigating alternatives to incinerating chemical weapons said those housed at the Blue Grass Army Depot probably will not be burned.

        The arsenal of old weapons at the facility near Richmond, about 25 miles south of Lexington, probably will be destroyed by one of the alternate methods now being analyzed, Robert Beaudet, a physical chemist at the University of Southern California, said Tuesday.

        The Army determined in the early 1980s that incineration was the safest way to destroy the 30,000 tons of old chemical weapons across the country, including the 523 tons of mustard gas and nerve-gas rockets stored in central Kentucky.

        Opponents, however, claim burning the weapons poses environmental and public-safety risks. In 1996, Congress ordered that the Army investigate alternatives, particularly for use at the Blue Grass Army Depot and at a similar site in Pueblo, Colo.

        Mr. Beaudet headed a National Research Council (NRC) panel that investigated seven methods besides incineration for destroying old chemical weapons. In its report, the group determined that all of the alternate methods would work but that further testing is needed to know what risks each method poses.

        “Each technology package raises other technical issues that must be resolved,” the report said. “One of the crucial issues is the identity and disposition of byproducts.”

        The government faces an April 2007 deadline to destroy all of its old chemical weapons. In its report, the NRC panel concluded that it is unlikely that any of the alternate methods studied could be ready to meet that deadline.

        Meanwhile, $93 million in congressional budget cuts approved last week could delay weapons destruction at some military installations. Nearly one-fourth of the cuts will come at the Blue Grass Army Depot, where at least 1.7 percent of the military's lethal chemical agents are stored. But Mickey Morales, a spokesman for the Army's Office of the Program Manager for Chemical Demilitarization, said that decision will have little effect on the plan to dispose of chemical weapons there.

        Delays in determining how the Army will destroy its stockpile in Kentucky mean the government will not be ready in fiscal year 2000 — which begins Oct. 1 — to build the facility where the weapons will be dismantled, Mr. Morales said.

        Robert Steurer, a spokesman for Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., who has been active in the battle over how the chemicals will be destroyed, said Tuesday that Mr. McConnell is watching the situation closely and wants to make sure that budget cuts don't endanger the congressional directive to test the alternate technologies.

        The alternate methods include vaporizing the rockets with a form of artificial lightning; using liquid nitrogen to freeze the weapons; and combining other chemicals to make the nerve agent into a less-toxic substance that can be digested by microorganisms.

        The NRC report did not rank the methods, and it did not compare any of them with incineration. The results of the testing on three of the proposed alternatives are due to be submitted to Congress before the end of September. The Army also plans to conduct detailed testing of three other methods.

       



How to put a porker in your art collection
600 join melting pot
Schools sued for holy day closings
Kings Island taking no chances
Recent deaths of riders at Tristate parks
Art museums try to draw Web audience
Nine hospitals drop Medicare HMO
What's Your Opinion: Questions of fairness
Hate-crime hoax at Miami?
New world opens for students
Sea of friends mourn Ross teens
Lawsuit charges abuse of teen inmate
Will GOP's bite be as big as its bark?
Pilfered lawn duck at-large
'Resource Guide' offers breast cancer network
Who killed King Tut? 'Mr. Mummy' might know
$214,000 goes for rec projects
County lags 200 years on some paperwork
GET TO IT
Girl who wants to be vet saves 6 pups trapped in pipe
Judge rules city may raze building
Man found dead in Over-the-Rhine
Mayor's court now magistrate's
Monroe council approves 2 officials
NKU, Sparks honor each other
Payroll change upsets workers
Police looking for witnesses to fatal crash
Prisoner's beard-cutting case headed to trial
Rain charging reservoirs, but water bans unaffected
Residents weigh in on bridge's future
Skipped-paycheck plan upsets workers
Slain woman's family sues store where she worked
Theater land offered for roomier library
TRISTATE DIGEST
Upscale seniors' residence proposed
Villa Hills eliminates administrator job
- Weapons unlikely to be burned
Zoning chief latest to quit development department


 
Search | Questions/help | News tips | Letters to the editors
Web advertising | Place a classified | Subscribe | Circulation

Copyright 1995-2000. The Cincinnati Enquirer, a Gannett Co. Inc. newspaper.
Use of this site signifies agreement to terms of service updated 4/5/2000.