Friday, September 24, 1999
GOP social spending bill advances
Measure would cut Clinton favorites
BY ALAN FRAM
The Associated Press
WASHINGTON A $316 billion social spending bill that Republicans pushed through a House subcommittee Thursday would cut many of President Clinton's education, health and labor priorities, setting up a sure clash between Congress and the White House.
Though the measure equals or exceeds Mr. Clinton's requests for educating handicapped students, treating AIDS patients and the Job Corps, Democrats denounced it for cuts it would level elsewhere, including the president's plans for hiring teachers, job training for teen-agers, and Head Start.
Education Secretary Richard Riley said he would urge Mr. Clinton to veto the legislation.
By their actions today, it is clear that the Republican majority has failed the American people, Mr. Riley said.
The bill's reductions raised questions about whether it would ever be approved by Congress. The likeliest scenario was that it would join a parade of other spending bills that, with or without vetoes, would reach final form only in negotiations between lawmakers and White House officials.
Republicans said they paid for the measure while honoring their pledge not to use Social Security surpluses.
We are committed, all of us, to stop bleeding Social Security reserves, said Rep. John Porter, R-Ill., chairman of the House Appropriations Committee subcommittee that approved the bill.
Mr. Porter did not mention the bookkeeping devices Republicans used. This included delaying billions in spending until 2001, declaring $1.4 billion in a decades-old home-heating aid program for the poor to be an emergency, and reclaiming $3 billion in unspent welfare funds from the states.
The measure the biggest of the 13 spending bills for the fiscal year that begins Oct. 1 was approved on a party-line 8-6 vote.
Most of the measure covers automatically paid benefits such as Medicaid. For every other federal education, health and labor program the GOP would provide $89.4 billion. That is $2.2 billion less than Clinton requested, and $300 million less than is being spent this year.
CDC rejects Fernald study
AROUND THE COMMONWEALTH
Bauer proposes 16% flat income tax, cuts in breaks
Budget battle may last
Candidates push for better schools
Council candidates push for improved schools
GOP social spending bill advances
Answers coming, chief assures firefighters
Auction for symphony to include artwork, violin
Bombings put black college on edge, alert
Brush fire tests 10 departments
Cities reconsider gun trade-ins
City not giving up on housing grant
Do two Ludlow jobs conflict?
'Ejay' Callner assisted HUC archivist
Ex-guard jeered by family of victim
Ex-guard to become a prisoner
Ex-magistrate back in jail
FBI focuses on scientist in telescope lens theft
Former Butler Co. magistrate back behind bars
Futurists think global
Guardsmen hailed for tornado work
Gulf War vets sought for medical study
Independence considers law regulating vicious animals
Landen rape not by serial rapist, DNA proves
Lawmaker says state profiting illegally from license plates
Lucas asks seniors for copies of prescription drug bills
Muslims plan International Academy
New era begins for UC
Paducah workers fear they are dying
Playground lesson in unity
Police chief says alcohol eased job stress
Possible plutonium exposure at Fernald probed
Take a trip back to 1800s with Blue Ash Heritage Day
Turfway has party air for Day of Champions
Two are sought in Covington shooting
Union chief urges study on workplace violence
Voters hold key to new high school
Woman loves fest to the core
Woman's body found in Bond Hill alley