enquirer.com

News
Front Page
Local
Sports
-Bengals
-Reds
-Bearcats
-Xavier
Business
Health
Technology
Weather
Traffic
Back Issues
Photographs
AP Wire
-World
-Nation
-Sports
-Business
-Arts
-Health

Classifieds
Jobs
Autos
General
Obits
Homes

Freetime
Movies
Dining
Calendars
Weekend

Opinion
Columns
Borgman

GoCinci
HelpDesk
Feedback
Circulation
Subscribe
Phone #'s
Search

E N Q U I R E R   L O C A L   N E W S   C O V E R A G E
Wednesday, November 10, 1999

Environmentalists: Utilities seek shield from clear air laws




BY PAUL BARTON
Gannett News Service

        WASHINGTON — Environmentalists claimed Tuesday that Midwestern utilities have drafted a one-paragraph “rider” to get Congress to shield them from a Justice Department lawsuit charging them with massive violations of clean air laws.

        One of the companies the Justice Department is suing is Cincinnati-based Cinergy.

        “This is a classic case of lawmakers assisting lawbreakers,” said Mark Wenzler of the National Environmental Trust, a grass-roots environmen tal organization.

        A seemingly innocuous bill being circulated in the Capitol this week would give the companies immunity from “civil or criminal penalties or sanctions” while the government's suits are pending.

        Environmental groups, who released the document late Tuesday, said it is drafted to be attached as a last-minute “rider” to one of four federal appropriations bill in Congress's last-minute rush to adjourn.

        Steve Brash, a Cinergy spokesman, refused to comment. “We don't discuss legislative strategy.”

        Other utilities responded that they are not seeking any retroactive pro tection from clean air laws. Instead, they said, they want to clarify pollution laws as they continue to do maintenance work on their older power plants.

        The utilities have proposed legislative language that, in part, says an “owner or operator shall not be subject to civil or criminal penalties or sanctions ... for continued operation of that electric utility unit.”

        The Justice Department, acting in concert with the Environmental Protection Agency, filed suit against five major Midwestern utilities and two from the South last week, charging that older coal-fired electricity plants illegally release massive amounts of pollutants.

        In a separate administrative action, the EPA targeted the Tennessee Valley Authority for similar violations.

        The Clinton administration has been trying for two years to force the utilities to curb emissions from the plants.

        Northeastern and New England states claim that utility emissions in the Midwest drift toward them, contributing significantly to ozone or smog formation over their cities.

        The Justice Department charges that the utilities have made frequent modifications to their coal-fired plants without following necessary steps to reduce smog, acid rain and soot.

        Copies of the industry's proposal were circulating on Capitol Hill Tuesday afternoon.

        Utilities were seeking help from such key senators as Mississippi's Trent Lott, the majority leader, and West Virginia's Robert Byrd, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Appropriations Committee, environmentalists said.

        Mr. Lott's office did not return calls.

        “It basically ties the EPA's hands and allows them (violating utilities) to continue their illegal practices indefinitely,” Mr. Wenzler said.

        Pat Hemlepp, spokesman for American Electric Power, denied the industry was seeking protection from the lawsuit.

        “It provides us some certainty as to what we can do at our power plants while this is going on,” he said.

        But other environmentalists said their lawyers had concluded that it would provide retroactive protection.

        “We think it is a dodge. We think it is definitely retroactive,” said Jack Shaner of the Ohio Environmental Council.

        “We think this is a classic case of they got nailed, claim they did nothing wrong, yet now they are trying to rewrite the rules.”

        Cox News Service contributed to this report.

       



Pipe bomb, threat rattle high schools
Tug of war over a 'holy place'
Warm temperatures stay with us
Lawmaker to urge employee-gift ban
Prosecutor allegations need outside investigation
Hustler store faces new charges
Jews say Baptists' recruiting deceptive
Senate OKs tobacco money plan
Freeways a litter sore spot
Hospital tab a ticket to freedom
Magnet programs may be reduced
NKU basks in funding news
Pilarczyk recovering after angioplasty
Racist brochures litter Anderson
Rhodes, Luebbers consider county commission run
Union Twp. voters may dump name
Voinovich says he's for Bush
Health fair targets men in the city
New tools for diabetes
Online database helps blood supply
Girl Scout alternative
'Light It Up' shines beyond familiar fare
'Pokemon' only for the truly game
Regis cured Clifton trivia addict
Butler County faces Channel 2 blackout
Accused teacher won't be charged
Bank largess leads to Internet access
Club for mentally ill offers welcome
Court for mentally ill offenders advocated
Court refuses tower case
Detective: Suspect told about killing
- Environmentalists: Utilities seek shield from clear air laws
Fernald back to work after anthrax scare
Fox highway just about ready
Kenton to install new storm sirens
Mason businesses to expand
Officer resigns after pleading guilty to drunken driving
Purchase in Norwood under cloud
TRISTATE DIGEST
Waste gripes heard


 
Search | Questions/help | News tips | Letters to the editors
Web advertising | Place a classified | Subscribe | Circulation

Copyright 1995-2000. The Cincinnati Enquirer, a Gannett Co. Inc. newspaper.
Use of this site signifies agreement to terms of service updated 4/5/2000.