Friday, December 03, 1999
Jury backs school officials in pot case
BY BEN L. KAUFMAN
The Cincinnati Enquirer
A federal jury in Cincinnati on Thursday said former Talawanda schools Superintendent Dennis Leone's aggressive responses did not violate a couple's freedom to criticize him.
It was a heartbreaking verdict for Diana and Martin Stamler, the Somerville couple who sued Mr. Leone. He had threatened their son with expulsion in his senior year after he was caught smoking a marijuana cigarette.
We've risked everything and we've lost everything, Mrs. Stamler said. We've lost our retirement. We'll have to file for bankruptcy.
The Stamlers said they hadn't expected to land in court with crushing legal bills when they raised their voices in 1995 about Mr. Leone's handling of the discipline of their son David.
Their attorney, Scott Greenwood, said the Stamlers would consider appealing, in part because educators might draw the wrong lesson.
A verdict like this can only encourage retaliatory activity, Mr. Greenwood said.
R. Gary Winters, attorney for Mr. Leone and co-defendant Edward Derickson, a school board member, called it a good verdict. His clients faced the possibility of compensatory and punitive damages had the jury sided with the Stamlers.
I feel vindicated, Mr. Derickson said, and this is very important to the district he has served for 10 years.
Mr. Leone, now superintendent in Chillicothe, could not be reached for comment.
Mr. Greenwood speculated that the jury thought the Stamlers were not silenced, because they continued to write letters requesting information from the school board.
The Stamlers had maintained that Mr. Leone manipulated his counseling staff, and used them and board meetings and letters to local newspapers to silence them.
It's all the letters, Mr. Greenwood said, assuming that he had failed to show that the letters were not the same as confronting Mr. Leone in the public forum of school board meetings.
They could attend, but they won't, because of what Dr. Leone did to them, Mr. Greenwood told jurors in closing arguments on Wednesday.
The defendants denied that their responses were so intimidating that they violated the couple's rights.
Instead, Mr. Leone and Mr. Derickson said they exercised only their First Amendment rights to respond to criticism.
Or, as Mr. Winters said in his closing argument, the Stamlers can say whatever they want. They can't, however, deny other people the opportunity to respond.
Mr. Stamler, in his 70s, is retired. Mrs. Stamler, a nurse, wondered bitterly if she could work enough overtime to pay Mr. Greenwood and avoid bankruptcy.
Mrs. Stamler said a more urgent concern was son David's unwelcome offer to help restore their solvency by going to work and dropping out of pre-med at Miami University, where he is a junior.
Two ways Council can make us proud
Inmate who killed girlfriend ineligible for furlough
KKK won't have cross on square
Cathedral cleanup takes more time, money
Mrs. Clinton's hour-long visit nets $75,000
Transplants firmly rooted
Witness: Officer was asleep at the wheel
Web site answers Hanukkah questions
Outpouring saves children's charity
Airport vigilant for lapses in security
Jury backs school officials in pot case
Mercy Fairfield to build open-heart surgery unit
Truck ban lifting is called risky
Schott movie coming to cable
Teacher union head runs for Ohio post
GET TO IT
Holiday TV schedule
Hugs for healing
Queen City's moments to shine reflected in book
'Witness to Hope' explains life of Pope John Paul II
Woman faces Internet porn charges
Boone, 2 deputies settle suit in death
Cops getting new computer partners
Egg producer sued by Ohio EPA
FBI salutes effort in neighborhood
Lakota to survey adults on job schools are doing
Lessons focus on understanding
Mistrial in Hamilton slaying
Museum puts off expansion
Ohio Democrats may forgo Senate endorsement
Phone poll asks about city schools and services
Rancor over utility's expansion
Sixth-grader makes mark on Christmas card
Springfield Twp. winter fest returns
Tavern owner sues county to prove her vote