enquirer.com

News
Front Page
Local
Sports
-Bengals
-Reds
-Bearcats
-Xavier
Business
Health
Technology
Weather
Traffic
Back Issues
Photographs
AP Wire
-World
-Nation
-Sports
-Business
-Arts
-Health

Classifieds
Jobs
Autos
General
Obits
Homes

Freetime
Movies
Dining
Calendars
Weekend

Opinion
Columns
Borgman

GoCinci
HelpDesk
Feedback
Circulation
Subscribe
Phone #'s
Search

E N Q U I R E R   L O C A L   N E W S   C O V E R A G E
Thursday, December 09, 1999

Fernald worker database needs funds




BY RACHEL MELCER
The Cincinnati Enquirer

        Filling out questionnaires and undergoing medical tests, thousands of Fernald employees are giving tens of thousands of answers about the work they did at the former uranium processing plant. But no one has yet responded to their most pressing questions.

        They want to know, statistically, what diseases they might have or might develop after years spent working around radioactive and toxic materials.

        They want their doctors to be able to screen for suspect ailments. And they want to know if they should be taking additional precautions — quitting smoking or changing their diets — to ward off potential disease.

        University of Cincinnati scientist Susan Pinney told fellow members of the Fernald Health Effects Subcommittee this week that she could find those answers by analyzing the results of workers' medical tests and employment history questionnaires. But someone needs to foot the estimated $800,000 bill to create, study and maintain the database.

        Attorney Eric Kearney said Wednesday he is asking the Department of Energy (DOE) to do so. And he is optimistic.

        “We are making progress, and we're talking to the appropriate parties in order to see if we can get the funding,” he said. “It's a request. It's not a demand, and it's not anything they're required to do.”

Paved the way
        DOE paid workers $15 million for the medical monitoring program in 1995 to settle a lawsuit. More than 2,500 current and former employees have participated in the exams.

        But unlike employees at other federal nuclear cleanup sites, who followed Fernald workers' lead in suing, the local group did not ask for additional money to pay for data analysis.

        “Our program is unique because it was the first one. ... We broke a lot of ground. But the ones that followed were able to benefit from our knowledge and they were able to have these databases,” said Mr. Kearney, who oversees the Fernald settlement fund.

        “I wouldn't say it's a departure for DOE. They've (paid for databases) at other sites,” he continued. “That's our chief argument, seeking a little bit of consistency.”

        DOE, which is spending billions to clean up Fernald, turned down an earlier request for database funding. Officials could not be reached for comment Wednesday.

        Dr. Pinney said it would cost an estimated $368,740 to create the database, enter the information, analyze workers' risk of developing certain cancers, and maintain the system for one year. Keeping it going for an additional 29 years would cost between $391,000 and $482,000, depending on how many workers continued to participate.

For help with care
        “This would make the delivery of care more effective and more focused,” she said.

        Mr. Kearney said he hopes to secure funding by this summer — but there is no guarantee that DOE will respond to his request.

        Data on health risks could be used to bolster workers' compensation claims against DOE and its contractors, Dr. Pinney said.

        Gene Branham, spokesman for the Fernald Atomic Trades and Labor Council, said the workers will not give up in their quest for answers.

        “DOE has not been friendly to the worker, historically. So we have no reason to believe they will support it,” he said. “If we have to, we will find our own source of funding. ... There's no shortage of support” within the union.

       



House OKs late-term abortion ban
Who's at fault when kids play with guns?
City high schools 'a failure'
CPS facing tough decision on levies
'Super Saturday' likely to stay - for now
Voice-mail crash affects thousands
Cincinnatian files suit over T-shirt shoot
Judge scolds adults in Justin case
Clermont discovers role on the Underground Railroad
Sewer rates to soar
Shirey review will be done in open council
Mayor wants to be rec director
Mental health agencies merge
Serious about spreading cheer
Study: New college needed
Vote to raise tax required courage
Canadian quartet's concert intense, pleasing
Clooney return to 'ER' uncertain
Diamond rolls through career of gems
GET TO IT
'Jekyll' seldom hits right chord
Queen City's moments to shine reflected in book
Stuff for stockings
Toddler needs special chair to sit up
'Nutcracker' mom does fancy steps
Colerain sees need for road levy
District rejects idea of arming school principals
- Fernald worker database needs funds
Fire alarm saves man asleep
Girlfriend's killer gets 16 to life
High school/rec center will cost $71.9M
Killer convicted after five years
Ky. 9 stretch completed
Man overcome in blaze rescued by firefighters
NKU grad's neighbor: Didn't mean to kill her
Ohio bill declares campaign donations on Net
Project will take kids on virtual tours of Cincinnati Art Museum
Quoted words turn township meeting ugly
Sirens to be ready for tornado season
Sister tells of burying body parts
Some postal offices to be open Sundays
TRISTATE DIGEST
Warren sheriff clears new hurdle
Young driver may end up in adult court


 
Search | Questions/help | News tips | Letters to the editors
Web advertising | Place a classified | Subscribe | Circulation

Copyright 1995-2000. The Cincinnati Enquirer, a Gannett Co. Inc. newspaper.
Use of this site signifies agreement to terms of service updated 4/5/2000.