enquirer.com

News
Front Page
Local
Sports
-Bengals
-Reds
-Bearcats
-Xavier
Business
Weather
Traffic
Back Issues
AP Wire
-World
-Nation
-Sports
-Business
-Arts
-Health

Classifieds
Jobs
Autos
General
Obits
Homes

Freetime
TV Listings
Movies
Dining
Calendars
Weekend

Opinion
Columns
Borgman

GoCinci
HelpDesk
Feedback
Circulation
Subscribe
Phone #'s
Search

E N Q U I R E R   L O C A L   N E W S   C O V E R A G E
Tuesday, December 21, 1999

Deerfield sues Mason over site for water tower




BY KEVIN ALDRIDGE
The Cincinnati Enquirer

        DEERFIELD TWP. — The courts most likely will decide whether a six-acre parcel along Mason Road will have a water tower for Mason or a fire station and park for township residents.

        Deerfield Township trustees on Thursday filed a lawsuit in Warren County Common Pleas Court against Mason and township resident Roger Hoskins to appropriate the land by eminent domain.

        “It's unfortunate, but this looks like another issue that's going to be decided by the courts,” said Mason Mayor John McCurley. “It's just going to cost Mason taxpayers and township residents more money. It's senseless because we're going to end up getting the land anyway.”

        Last week, Mason leaders bought six acres along Mason Road, formerly owned by Mr. Hoskins, for about $385,000. City officials had slated the land for a water tower as part of Mason's $5 million water supply expansion project.

        The city's plans angered some neighboring township residents who complained a water tower would devalue their properties. They said putting the tower in the township made no sense, especially considering it would not serve township residents.

        Deerfield trustees, in an effort to thwart construction of the water tower, passed a resolution a week ago announcing their intent to appropriate the site for a park and future fire station. The move was the first step in taking the land through eminent domain.

        Under eminent domain a government body has the right to take private property for public use, but it must pay fair market value.

        “Our attorneys seem to think we have a strong case, otherwise we wouldn't have taken this action,” said Trustee Larry Backus. “Contrary to what the city of Mason might believe, we don't believe in wasting taxpayers' money on legal fees for (public relations) pur poses.”

        Mr. Backus said he wasn't surprised by Mason leaders' pledge to continue plans for the water tower, despite the township's claim to the land. However, he continued to question the city's motivation for seeking township land.

        “Why isn't Mason looking for land in the city to build this thing?” Mr. Backus said. “They have plenty of land available. Why don't they devalue their own residents' property?

        “This is nothing more than one of Mason's Pearl Harbor-style sneak attacks against the township,” he added. “The whole scenario stinks to high heaven.”

        But Mason leaders contend there is nothing “sneaky” about their plans, which have been in the works for almost two years. In fact, city leaders say if anyone's motivations for wanting the land is in question; it's the township's.

        “We are perplexed at the negative response received from the township on this matter, and curious as to when the township decided the Hoskins property was necessary for a fire station and a park,” said Mason City Manager Scot Lahrmer.

        Mr. Lahrmer said a year ago the township bought 135 acres on Mason-Montgomery Road, about 3.5 miles from the Hoskins site, claiming it would be used for the same purpose.

        “Deerfield Township showed no interest (in the land) until they learned the city of Mason was negotiating for a purchase,” he said.

        Mason leaders maintain the Hoskins property was selected because it had a higher elevation than the other two sites the city was considering. Mr. Lahrmer said the significance of high land elevation is twofold: it cuts the cost of building the tower because it would not have to be built as tall, and placing the tower near the end of the city's distribution system saves pumping costs by reducing the demand on booster pumps.

       



Mayor: Policies to be reviewed
Vouchers unconstitutional, judge rules
Blues singer tracked down on 30-year-old murder charge
Judge refuses to bar statement
No snow, but cold enough
Traffic not hustling with Pete Rose Way closed
Airport 25-year plan set
Avondale vows to reclaim streets
Hamilton Co. sewer bills may rise 9.5%
Queen City's moments to shine reflected in book
Teachers: Smaller class No. 1 priority
'Fantasia 2000' soundtrack fantastic achievement
Add a local touch to collection with these classical music CDs
GET TO IT
Richey's solos save jinxed WNKU benefit
Book signings bring out crazies
3 schools to be renovated
Addicted ex-dentist sentenced
Arson hits string instrument shop
Campbell GOP elects Barb Haas as chairwoman
Charity will be year-round
Dearborn committee establishes unity theme
- Deerfield sues Mason over site for water tower
Indian lifestyle studied
IRS expansion planned at new building in Covington
Lebanon decides not to seize land
Living organ donations soar
Man gets 15 years in Covington bank heist
Mason district loses treasurer
Monroe tries to fill in blanks
Ohio cashes 1st tobacco settlement check
Ohio school chief asks for opinions
Sales tax proposed with jail
TRISTATE DIGEST


 
Search | Questions/help | News tips | Letters to the editors
Web advertising | Place a classified | Subscribe | Circulation

Copyright 1995-2000. The Cincinnati Enquirer, a Gannett Co. Inc. newspaper.
Use of this site signifies agreement to terms of service updated 4/5/2000.