enquirer.com

News
Front Page
Local
Sports
-Bengals
-Reds
-Bearcats
-Xavier
Business
Health
Technology
Weather
Traffic
Back Issues
Photographs
AP Wire
-World
-Nation
-Sports
-Business
-Arts
-Health

Classifieds
Jobs
Autos
General
Obits
Homes

Freetime
Movies
Dining
Calendars
Weekend

Opinion
Columns
Borgman

GoCinci
HelpDesk
Feedback
Circulation
Subscribe
Phone #'s
Search

E N Q U I R E R   B U S I N E S S   C O V E R A G E
Thursday, December 30, 1999

CG&E rate cut too low, agency says




BY SPENCER HUNT
Enquirer Columbus Bureau

        COLUMBUS — Cincinnati Gas & Electric's plan to transform itself from a monopoly into a competitive power company doesn't do enough to cut customers' monthly power bills, Ohio Consumers' Counsel Robert Tongren says.

        Residential customers of the utility would save an average $2.30 a month starting in 2001 under a proposal that CG&E has filed with state regulators. Mr. Tongren's agency will argue that consumers are entitled to more savings when it files official objections with the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (PUCO) next month.

        “This is a very quickie review of an extensive document,” Mr. Tongren said Wednesday. “But we feel confident in saying there are some things that should be considered that weren't.”

Who pays old debt?
        At the center of the issue are millions in old debts the state let CG&E incur while it was a monopoly and how they will be paid off after competition begins in 2001. A deregulation law that the legislature passed in the summer lets CG&E continue to collect on those debts, even from customers who choose to take electricity from CG&E competitors.

        CG&E estimates its total transition costs at $927 million, plus $311 million in financing costs. Mr. Tongren says the estimates are too high and cost consumers too much.

        “Our goal will be to whittle the transition charges down to the extent that it's what the company will use for what it needs to recover,” Mr. Tongren said.

        The consumers counsel won't be able to offer a counter-estimate on CG&E's costs until shortly before it files its objections with state regulators Feb. 11.

Cinergy responds
        CG&E is entitled to collect money to pay off loans used to build newer power plants, Mr. Tongren said. But he said those debts should be diluted by revenues from older power stations consumers have already paid off.

        Mr. Tongren said the counsel also will argue for a bigger monthly rate cut. He said the way the utility computed its costs waters down a mandatory 5 percent rate cut for residential customers that lawmakers passed last year.

        Steven Brash, a spokesman for CG&E's parent company, Cinergy, said the utility's estimates already reflect its actual costs. He also disputed Mr. Tongren's claim that older power stations should be used to pay off newer ones.

        The PUCO won't issue a ruling in the case until after March 27, when public hearings and reports are complete.

        The state's job is further complicated by the fact that Ohio's four other major utilities are filing similar plans. Those plans are likely to face similar objections.

       



City's products tell its story
'Made in Cincinnati' quiz
- CG&E rate cut too low, agency says
High tech key to future
Stock indexes hit record highs
Economic index at 40-year high
Elder-Beerman faces more shareholder pressure
Gibson in talks to renew contract with retailer
INDUSTRY NOTES: REAL ESTATE
COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE TRANSFERS
Ky. fears Net will hurt tax revenues
TRISTATE BUSINESS SUMMARY
TRISTATE MARKET SPOTLIGHT


 
Search | Questions/help | News tips | Letters to the editors
Web advertising | Place a classified | Subscribe | Circulation

Copyright 1995-2000. The Cincinnati Enquirer, a Gannett Co. Inc. newspaper.
Use of this site signifies agreement to terms of service updated 4/5/2000.