enquirer.com

News
Front Page
Local
Sports
-Bengals
-Reds
-Bearcats
-Xavier
Business
Health
Technology
Weather
Traffic
Back Issues
Photographs
AP Wire
-World
-Nation
-Sports
-Business
-Arts
-Health

Classifieds
Jobs
Autos
General
Obits
Homes

Freetime
Movies
Dining
Calendars
Weekend

Opinion
Columns
Borgman

GoCinci
HelpDesk
Feedback
Circulation
Subscribe
Phone #'s
Search

E N Q U I R E R   L O C A L   N E W S   C O V E R A G E
Wednesday, January 05, 2000

Bus ad suit renewed


Hyland, in new race, wants ruling changed

BY BEN L. KAUFMAN
The Cincinnati Enquirer

        As she opens her second run for Hamilton County commissioner, Democrat Marilyn Hyland is renewing her battle to get issues ads on Metro buses.

        Her motion for summary judgment, filed by attorney Scott Greenwood, also focuses a spotlight on contradictory decisions by federal judges in two similar suits.

        In Ms. Hyland's case, the Southwest Ohio Regional Transportation Authority refused to run her issue ads in 1998. Metro said its policy was to reject controversial ads for fear of losing bus riders.

        Ms. Hyland sued, but U.S. District Judge Sandra S. Beckwith said SORTA had not created a public forum on the sides of Metro buses and rejection didn't violate the candidate's First Amendment rights.

        In the other case, SORTA invoked the same rationale in 1997 to reject an ad from Local 1099 of the United Food & Commercial Workers because it showed members holding signs saying “UFCW Local 1099” and “Union Shop.”

        Local 1099 sued and U.S. District Judge Susan J. Dlott told SORTA to accept the ad because the company had no reasonable basis for concluding it was controversial.

        SORTA appealed and lost.

        The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit in Cincinnati went beyond Judge Dlott's decision and said SORTA policies and practices had created a public forum on the sides of Metro buses.

        That sweeping victory greatly limited SORTA's freedom to pick among proposed ads based on their content.

        The 6th Circuit ruling — which followed the Hyland decision by two months — created a precedent which Ms. Hyland's attorney invoked when he asked Judge Beckwith to reverse herself.

        Mr. Greenwood's summary judgment motion says there are no central, unresolved arguments over the facts and Judge Beckwith need only decide which party the law favors.

        Before she does that, however, SORTA will have a chance to respond to Mr. Greenwood's motion.

       



City workers renew bias claims
4 hospitals overwhelmed, divert patients away
Tornado damage heavy, not deadly
Area recovering from storm drenching
Flynts give up on downtown shop
Police widow waits for death-benefits appeal
Rhodes, Luebbers won't run for commissioner
Settlement reported near in jail death
2 students arrested in bomb report
Killer's sister gets probation for help
Ohio Girls Scouts offer new cookie
Patton address highlights workers
Dems add asterisk to GOP-led Senate
N.Ky. gets prime Senate seat
Queen City's moments to shine reflected in book
Cleveland polishes musical gem
Six weeks of programs marks hall reopening
Theaters only one act in Cleveland rebirth
10 health tips for 2000
Work to make sex fun, doctor tells women
GET TO IT
Santana works his magic with 10 Grammy nominations
Three Cincinnatians honored as arts patrons
Who wants to watch a game show?
25-year-old charged with murder
- Bus ad suit renewed
Edgewood schools tap Slone as new treasurer of district
Erlanger police get new office
Fire heavily damages Indian Hill house
Firefighter kicked out of training program
Funeral today for 4 family members
Indiana budgets $1.4M to curb problem gambling
Law: Review of police limited
License penalty reviewed
Mayor bows out as candidate for recreation job
Middletown commissioners select Sennet as chairman
New Y offers options for all
Rec center is a local asset
Schools find little savings after audit
TRISTATE DIGEST


 
Search | Questions/help | News tips | Letters to the editors
Web advertising | Place a classified | Subscribe | Circulation

Copyright 1995-2000. The Cincinnati Enquirer, a Gannett Co. Inc. newspaper.
Use of this site signifies agreement to terms of service updated 4/5/2000.