Thursday, February 17, 2000
Agency may revoke permit for chickens
Buckeye Egg wants another 800,000
The Associated Press
COLUMBUS, Ohio Environmental regulators want to reconsider a permit they granted that would allow Buckeye Egg Farm to add 800,000 chickens at its farm near Marseilles.
We determined that we needed to do a more thorough review of air issues, Heidi Griesmer, a spokeswoman with the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, said Wednesday.
The OEPA on Friday asked the Environmental Review Appeals Commission to send the permit back.
In a statement sent to the commission, Robert Hodanbosi, chief of the OEPA's air pollution control division, said the agency received new information about possible air pollution problems after the permit was issued.
Buckeye Egg now houses 2.5 million chickens at the farm about 55 miles north of Columbus.
A message seeking comment on the OEPA's request was left at the company.
The expansion permit was granted in October 1998 but was appealed by the group Concerned Citizens of Central Ohio.
The group's attorney, Richard Sahli, complained that residents raised questions about air pollution issues two years ago, before the permit was issued.
If the state took public comment seriously, the issue should have been addressed way back then, Mr. Sahli told the Columbus Dispatch.
A year ago, the OEPA agreed to reconsider a permit for expansion of a Buckeye Egg operation near Hartford. Buckeye Egg appealed, and that case is pending before the 10th Ohio District Court of Appeals.
Environmental activists who want more controls on factory farms said the OEPA's request to reconsider the permit at the Marseilles farm underscores the agency's failure to control pollution from livestock farms.
They noted that OEPA Director Christopher Jones just defended Ohio's regulations, in a letter to the U.S. EPA. The federal agency has criticized state controls.
We find it ironic that the Ohio EPA is vigorously defending its program, when it appears to be crumbling all around, said Susan Studer of the Ohio Environmental Council.
Ms. Griesmer said the issues involved are different. The U.S. EPA is talking about surface water issues, and the Buckeye Egg permit is about air pollution concerns, she said.
Search on for stadium solutions
Commissioners learning costly lessons
Debacle could delay other projects
Lessons will be put to use on Reds park
County signs up public relations support
Let's recruit Mike Brown for our team
Albright vows help to Blue Ash dad
Cities push change in school funds
Police, media mobilize for kids
Organ donation opinions diverse
Rivers on the rise, but not too much
Supreme Court asked to look at public defender pay
Queen City's moments to shine reflected in book
Writer lives his love story
Some pols dismiss what's best for area
Birds will fly up and be counted
GET TO IT
Here's how to join the bird count
Net increases isolation, study asserts
Georges Haidon cooks as a signer of books
Agency may revoke permit for chickens
Charter school shut for 3rd day
City likes development ideas
Downtown falcon lacks mate
Ex-guard step ahead of police
Fatal hit-skip remains mystery
Flack concert to promote breast cancer awareness
Ignorance of gun law no excuse
Lawsuit against village tossed
Mason chili cook-off heated
Mayor's city jail talk raises fuss
Park plans bandied about
Site prepared for Silverton CVS
Strip club site taken
TRISTATE DIGEST