enquirer.com

News
Front Page
Local
Sports
-Bengals
-Reds
-Bearcats
-Xavier
Business
Health
Technology
Weather
Traffic
Back Issues
Photographs
AP Wire
-World
-Nation
-Sports
-Business
-Arts
-Health

Classifieds
Jobs
Autos
General
Obits
Homes

Freetime
Movies
Dining
Calendars
Weekend

Opinion
Columns
Borgman

GoCinci
HelpDesk
Feedback
Circulation
Subscribe
Phone #'s
Search

E N Q U I R E R   L O C A L   N E W S   C O V E R A G E
Sunday, May 07, 2000

Ky. awaits abortion decision


Ruling may affect state law

By Susan Vela
The Cincinnati Enquirer

        Northern Kentucky legislators are paying close attention to the U.S. Supreme Court debate over abortion.

        They're especially eager for a ruling on Stenberg vs. Carhart, which stems from a Nebraska law banning a late-term procedure that opponents call “partial-birth” abortion.

        The nation's highest court recently heard the case, and justices are expected to announce a decision in late June. The outcome could affect similar laws in about 30 other states, including Kentucky.

        “Obviously, the Supreme Court's ruling will be controlling on Kentucky as well as Nebraska,” said state Rep. Tom Kerr, D-Taylor Mill, who practices law.

        Like most Kentucky legislators, Mr. Kerr opposes abortion.

        He is concerned about what transpired April 25, when six of the nine U.S. Supreme Court justices questioned the Nebraska law. Mr. Kerr says Nebraska and Kentucky legislators used similar language when drafting their legislation.

        “The only real difference is they use "unborn child' where we use "fetus,'” he said.

        Opponents of the procedure, which is performed in the last three months of pregnancy, also have called it “infanticide.” The procedure dilates the cervix so the fetus travels into the vagina feet first. A physician then punctures and suctions the brain to collapse the cranium.

        “It's about a grisly and inhumane procedure. I don't think people would allow such a thing happen to animals,” said Rep. Katie Stine, R-Fort Thomas. “There's a legitimate state interest.”

        The Kentucky General Assembly voted to ban such abortions in 1998, following years of lobbying by Kentucky Right to Life. U.S. District Judge John G. Heyburn ruled the law unconstitutional, which prompted the Kentucky Attorney General's Office to file an appeal now pending in the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

        Indiana legislators also have approved a ban, which exempts women whose lives depend on the procedure. It has gone unchallenged. Ohio Gov. Bob Taft is expected to sign a similar bill within the next two weeks. It will be the General Assembly's second attempt in five years to ban such abortions.

        Congress members also have pushed for a ban on such abortions.

        “These laws have a definite potential to put impact on the right to choose,” said Beth Wilson, head of the reproductive freedom project of the American Civil Liberties Union. “From our perspective, it's an abortion ban.”

        As for Kentucky's appeal, she doesn't expect the 6th Circuit to make any decisions until the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled.

        At the April hearing, Justices Sandra Day O'Connor and Anthony M. Kennedy indicated concerns that the Nebraska law is too sweeping.

        Simon Heller, an attorney for the New York-based Center for Reproductive Law and Policy, represented Dr. LeRoy Carhart in the Nebraska case. He said the law would erode Roe vs. Wade, the 1973 decision that legalized abortion.

        Justice Antonin Scalia, who is one of three justices considered to oppose abortions, questioned Mr. Heller.

        “You're saying there is no interest in the state with the destruction of a human life (emerging) from a womb?” he said. “You're saying the state has no interest at all in that?”

        Sen. Dick Roeding, R-Lakeside Park, has faith that Nebraska's law will be upheld.

        “I don't know how anyone in the judicial system can condone what most people consider murder,” he said. “I do believe in the long run Roe vs. Wade will be overturned.”

       



Ex-minister, selling a dream draws investors, investigators
RADEL: All's right again: Fountain's back
       Residents rave over renovation
Abortion ruling may affect Ky.
Bets, celebs, class, crass
Bush-Voinovich ticket? Just maybe
Pornography battle shifts
KIESEWETTER: Drew Carey sings praises of 'Geppetto'
A.M. REPORT
America's best illustrators at Art Institute
Bengals quiet on drink issue
Census oversights irritate many in disabled community
'Cinderella' introduces new audience to ballet
Clergy, rescuers honor tradition
DEMALINE: Playwright Athol Fugard at UC this fall
Get to it
DAUGHERTY: Head of hair ain't what it used to be
- Ky. awaits abortion decision
Mason schools may add offerings
New street closings listed
Painter picks 'Dandelion Swine'
Patrol pedals emergency aid
Preservationists find they must take on tough battles
PULFER: Shopping 101
SAMPLES: Chaperones monitor safety at post-prom events
Stars shine on summer theater screens
Theater review
They intend to walk the world
UC biologist takes survey of plant life
Underground Railroad site gets grant
BRONSON: No heroes
CROWLEY: Kentucky politics
Queen City's moments to shine reflected in book


 
Search | Questions/help | News tips | Letters to the editors
Web advertising | Place a classified | Subscribe | Circulation

Copyright 1995-2000. The Cincinnati Enquirer, a Gannett Co. Inc. newspaper.
Use of this site signifies agreement to terms of service updated 4/5/2000.