Sunday, May 21, 2000
Chesley, Lindner tout national clout
Spending limits recently defeated
By Howard Wilkinson
The Cincinnati Enquirer
Cincinnati is not only a major source of campaign dollars for both Republicans and Democrats, but it also is the battleground for one of the campaign finance reform movement's biggest defeats in recent years.
For a brief period in 1997, Cincinnati had both a campaign spending limit and contribution limits for Cincinnati City Council campaigns.
The spending limit of three times a council member's salary, passed along with contribution limits on a 5-4 council vote in 1997, was never enforced; it was immediately challenged in U.S. District Court here by unsuccessful GOP council candidate John Kruse.
Mr. Kruse won his case at every step of the legal process. The city, backed by campaign finance reform groups around the country, lost for good when the U.S. Supreme Court refused in November 1998 to hear its appeal.
The next year, City Council voted 5-4 to do away with the campaign contribution limits of $1,000 per individual, $2,500 from political action committees and $15,000 from political parties.
In 1999, with the contribution limits off, council campaign spending hit a record of $2.5 million.
Two Cincinnatians have made national reputations as prodigious political givers and fund-raisers lawyer Stanley Chesley for the Democrats and financier Carl Lindner, who ordinarily supports Republicans but who has given substantial sums to Democrats as well.
Mr. Chesley, one of the nation's most successful class action trial attorneys, is close to both President Clinton and Vice President Al Gore and has raised millions for Democratic National Committee and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.
In last year's Cincinnati City Council campaign, Mr. Lindner was by far the biggest contributor, giving $179,000 to eight candidates seven of whom won election.
So far in the 2000 federal election cycle, Mr. Lindner and members of his family have given $945,000 to various presidential and congressional candidates and political party committees, both Republican and Democrat.
Mapplethorpe battle changed art world
TV movie brings back chilling memories
'Dirty Pictures' uses plenty of artistic license
PULFER: Parkinson's new race for Pete Strauss
Would you strip to be in a movie?
Do's and don'ts for extras
: Good cop, bad cop - or both?
CPS teachers weigh merit pay plan
Many schools look at teacher rewards
Q&A with Jim Lehrer
Tax plans may not help all
WILKINSON: Giuliani put sense before politics
Bush, Gore latch onto campaign reform
Chesley, Lindner tout national clout
Campaign reform: In their own words
BRONSON: Home sweet cool home
Chamber orchestra's new conductor plans excitement, diversity
DEMALINE:Bard's political play first for area
GELFAND: Carnegie gig earns students London invitation
GET TO IT
KNIPPENBERG:School teaches wrestling, and, more importantly, how to entertain
May Festival gets off to glorious start
Pig Parade/Eden Pork
DAUGHERTY: Pardon me for saying almost anything
Four vie for mayor
Lucas has 3 potential foes
SAMPLES: Boost for schools: Families who care
Sign honors war hero
CROWLEY: Dems circle the wagons
Children, adults bond at Black Family Day
Dems vie for shot at Roeding
Event recalls pioneer days
Firm helps Mason teens
Golf course atop old dump poses special challenges
HAWTHORNE:Rhodes entitled to another term at Statehouse
Indicted councilman elusive
Justice's idea draws doubts
Lady Comets' big win earns a postmark
Lebanon's other growth: controversy
Ohio's Amish seek help for underage drinking
Pioneer gathering recalls frontier
Springfield Twp. bank robbery is 3rd in 2 days
Waynesville market more than fresh produce