Friday, June 16, 2000
Ex-aide issues polygraph challenge
Councilwoman, consultant scrap over $20,000 fee
By Kevin Aldridge
The Cincinnati Enquirer
MASON A campaign consultant who says Councilwoman Betty Davis owes him $20,000 has challenged the longtime politician to take a lie-detector test to validate his claim.
Don Gingerich of Springboro, senior adviser of Gin gerich & Associates, sent a letter this week to Ms. Davis, a former Mason mayor, asking her to submit to a polygraph to prove she hired him to run her recent campaign for state representative. Mr. Gingerich claims the 19-year council veteran promised to pay him $20,000, plus expenses.
She's made no attempt to resolve this issue and she's still denying what she owes, he said. Now if she would like to take a polygraph test stating she didn't hire me, I'd be glad to do that.
Ms. Davis called the suggestion that she take a lie-detector test laughable.
My first reaction was to laugh because it was so ridiculous, she said. In his letter, Don threatened that things would get unpleasant if I didn't pay. ... I won't be blackmailed.
But she will appear before the Ohio Elections Commission next month. Mr. Gin gerich filed a complaint with the state board in May claiming that Ms. Davis failed to report more than $30,000 in unpaid campaign expenses in her post-campaign expense report to the Warren County Board of Elections.
The hearing scheduled for 10:30 a.m. July 6 is one of 45 cases the board will hear that day.
If Don truly has a problem, what he needs to do is file a (lawsuit) and let's go to court on this thing, said Ms. Davis.
Mr. Gingerich said he has an attorney and will probably file suit within the next week or week and a half.
Mr. Gingerich, who has been managing campaigns mostly for congressional candidates since 1965, says Ms. Davis agreed to an oral contract for his services, but after losing the Republican primary in March refused to pay the consulting fee.
Ms. Davis maintains that he was a volunteer in her campaign and that a monetary arrangement was never discussed. She added she attempted to pay Mr. Ginger ich some money for mileage, phone and printing expenses.
However, he refused to cash her check.
That's because she marked it paid-in-full, which it wasn't, said Mr. Gingerich.
If I would have cashed it, it would have been acknowledging that she owed me nothing else, when the truth is she owes me much more than that. She obviously acknowledges that she owes some money or she wouldn't have sent a check in the first place.
Dangers present for kids at play
Rumpke driver charged in 3 deaths
Gore raises tax cut on local stop
Gore outlines new tax cuts
Gore vs. Bush on tax cut plans
Olympics advice: We'll need billions
Charges heard in prank case
Lawmakers, coalition to confer on school funding
Snarl to Speedway expected
Speedway's layout attracts Metallica
Diocese of Covington enlists singers for 2000 celebration
Chabot contests mink farm subsidies
Woman who cheated nuns on probation
Cool for sale
GET TO IT
Pig Parade: Roy Lichtenswine
WSAI-AM's 'JFPO' to retire
Aquarium nursery expecting babies
Audit faults state on set-asides
Baptist leader has ties to Ky.
Classes cover hazards for kids
Clerk testifies in case of would-be robbery
Clermont studies slave 'conductors'
Embezzlement may have started earlier
Ex-aide issues polygraph challenge
Kenton, air board win $3.7 million grant
Lebanon named as top shopping spot
Newtown traffic to be eased
Old school gets upgrade
Police chief candidate must resign council seat
Queen City's moments to shine reflected in book
Road plan threatens tranquility
Second dog hurt in stab attack
Senator wants gun bill on ballot
Taft signs bill giving schools $603M
Volunteers to 'sweep' riverbanks