enquirer.com

News
Front Page
Local
Sports
-Bengals
-Reds
-Bearcats
-Xavier
Business
Health
Technology
Weather
Traffic
Back Issues
Photographs
AP Wire
-World
-Nation
-Sports
-Business
-Arts
-Health

Classifieds
Jobs
Autos
General
Obits
Homes

Freetime
Movies
Dining
Calendars
Weekend

Opinion
Columns
Borgman

GoCinci
HelpDesk
Feedback
Circulation
Subscribe
Phone #'s
Search

E N Q U I R E R   L O C A L   N E W S   C O V E R A G E
Saturday, September 23, 2000

Abortion restriction blocked


Late-term ban will await trial

The Associated Press and The Cincinnati Enquirer

        DAYTON, Ohio — A federal judge on Friday refused to allow Ohio's ban on a late-term abortion procedure to go into effect and said it is likely the new law is unconstitutional.

        The procedure, known medically as dilation and extraction, involves draining the skull of a fetus before it is fully removed from the uterus. Opponents refer to the procedure as partial- birth abortion.

        Judge Walter Rice earlier had temporarily blocked enforcement of the law. Friday's decision will keep it from going into effect until a trial or action by an appeals court. The law had been scheduled to go into effect Aug. 18.

        Judge Rice said the law probably is unconstitutional because it would not allow the procedure to be performed when it is safer than other methods of abortion. He said the law would not allow women to have the procedure when they have serious physical or mental problems and the procedure would be the safest even if it were not absolutely necessary.

        Joe Case, director of public affairs for the Ohio Attor ney General's Office, said while the ruling was not in the state's favor, it was a small moral victory.

        “We've got the judge to agree that the law only applies to the (dilation and extraction) procedure,” he said.

        One problem with a similar Nebraska law that the U.S. Supreme Court struck down was that it was too broad.

        A physician who operates clinics in Clifton, Dayton and Akron filed a lawsuit challenging the new law. Dr. Martin Haskell, owner of Women's Medical Professional Corp., says the law would impose an undue burden on access to abortion.

        The state says the law protects unborn children.

        Al Gerhardstein, Dr. Haskell's attorney, said the judge agreed with the lawsuit's prevailing argument.

        “Ohio cannot ban it (the procedure) in a way that keeps it unavailable to women,” he said. “We're pleased he saw that so clearly.”

        The ruling left his client, Dr. Haskell, relieved, Mr. Gerhardstein said.

        “His clinics have procedures scheduled every weekday and this will allow them to continue without prosecution,” he said. “And that's very important for women in this state.”

        The law makes the procedure a crime unless the mother's life or health is threatened by the pregnancy. It carries penalties of up to eight years in prison and a maximum fine of $15,000 to those who perform the procedure.

        “Without a preliminary injunction, physicians such as plaintiff Haskell would face the possibility of criminal prosecution and civil liability which may effectively chill their practice of medicine to such an extent that would rely on methods of abortion that are riskier to their patients,” Judge Rice wrote in his ruling.

        Dr. Haskell persuaded Judge Rice in 1995 to reject Ohio's first ban as unconstitutional. The 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld that decision, and the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear the case.

        State officials say the latest ban is designed to satisfy state and federal courts and to comply with criticisms from various federal courts that similar laws were too vague.

        A conference call is scheduled for Sept. 28 for all parties involved to see what the next step will be.

        “This is a preliminary decision by the judge,” Mr. Case said. “It is not a final decision on the merits of the law.”

       



Tornado recovery operations under way
'It seemed like God was in control'
It's deja vu for Guardsman/helper
Former councilman admits to voter fraud
RAMSEY: Shootings
- Abortion restriction blocked
Schools chief gets positive review
Ceremony welcomes 90 new American citizens
DNA leads to suspect in rape from 1993
HOWARD: West End touchstone 150 years
MCNUTT: Yesteryear Book takes look back at Butler
Prison worker pleads guilty to illicit affair
School plans 10th birthday party
Trial to proceed in fatal shooting
Concert review
Dance review
Consignment buying comes of age
:Discovery Channel star debuts decorating book
:Kitchens and baths sparkle at show
Bond Hill man charged in rapes, kidnappings
Campbell aims to conserve
Clintons' overnight guests
Court of Appeals rejects Kentucky's Megan's Law
Gardens Center more than shelter
Insurance method deemed 'unfriendly'
Man gets 30 years for shaking baby
Opinion sought on sale of guns
Ted Celeste falling further behind
Get to it
Kentucky News Briefs
Pig Parade: Hog Wash
Tristate A.M. Report


 
Search | Questions/help | News tips | Letters to the editors
Web advertising | Place a classified | Subscribe | Circulation

Copyright 1995-2000. The Cincinnati Enquirer, a Gannett Co. Inc. newspaper.
Use of this site signifies agreement to terms of service updated 4/5/2000.