Cincinnati.Com
NKY.COM  |  ENQUIRER  |  CIN WEEKLY  |  Classifieds  |  Cars  |  Homes  |  Jobs  |  Help
Currently:
56°F
Cloudy
Weather | Traffic
The Enquirer
HOME
NEWS
ENTERTAINMENT
SPORTS
REDS
BENGALS
LOCAL GUIDE
MULTIMEDIA
ARCHIVES
SEARCH
 
 TODAY'S ENQUIRER 
 Front Page 
-- Local News 
 Sports 
 Business 
 Editorials 
 Tempo 
 Home Style 
 Travel 
 Health 
 Technology 
 Weather 
 Back Issues 
 Search 
 Subscribe 

 SPORTS 
 Bearcats 
 Bengals 
 High School 
 Reds 
 Xavier 

 VIEWPOINTS 
 Jim Borgman 
 Columnists 
 Readers' views 

 ENTERTAINMENT 
 Movies 
 Dining 
 Horoscopes 
 Lottery Results 
 Local Events 
 Video Games 

 CINCINNATI.COM 
 Giveaways 
 Maps/Directions 
 Send an E-Postcard 
 Coupons 
 Visitor's Guide 

 CLASSIFIEDS 
 Jobs 
 Cars 
 Homes 
 Obituaries 
 General 
 Place an ad 

 HELP 
 Feedback 
 Subscribe 
 Search 
 Newsroom Directory 




 
Friday, November 24, 2000

Dimpled chads wouldn't fly in Ohio


Blackwell cites Taft precedent

By Howard Wilkinson
The Cincinnati Enquirer

        “Dimpled” punch-card ballots in three Florida counties might end up making Al Gore president, but if the recount were going on in Ohio, the drama would probably be playing out much differently.

        In Ohio, unlike Florida, George W. Bush's legal team would have some precedent that might make it impossible for a county elections board to count ballots with only a small depression, or “dimple,” instead of being punched straight through.

FLORIDA RECOUNT
Latest news from Associated Press
        “Dimples just wouldn't fly in Ohio,” said Ohio Secretary of State J. Kenneth Blackwell, a Republican.

        The Gore forces in Florida are hoping that those ballots being counted in three Florida counties that have a “dimple” instead of a hole next to Al Gore's name will be counted.

        The Florida Supreme Court, in its Tuesday decision, gave the counties no standards to use in determining voters' intent, leaving the door open for the Democratic-controlled elections boards to count “dimpled” ballots for Mr. Gore.

        In Florida, county elections boards are dominated by one party or the other. But in Ohio, the law requires counties to have four-member elections boards split down the middle — two Democrats, two Republicans.

        When a board of elections in an Ohio county is split on an issue, the tie is broken by the secretary of state, the state's chief elections officer.

        So if this historic and controversial recount were happening in an Ohio county, chances are the question of whether to count dimpled ballots would end up in a tie vote — with Mr. Blackwell, a Republican, breaking the tie.
       

Hanging chads, sure
               Mr. Blackwell said he would rely on the opinion of his predecessor as secretary of state, Gov. Bob Taft, who was asked in 1994 to decide the question of what ballots could and could not be counted in a hand recount.

        According to Mr. Taft, “hanging chads” — bits of ballot hanging by only one or two corners — can be counted, because the voter's intention is clear.

        Dimples, Mr. Taft said, are out.

        “It is mere speculation to conclude that a bulging or indented chad indicates voter intent,” Mr. Taft wrote in his opinion.

        The voter who created an indentation or bulge, Mr. Taft said, may simply have changed his or her mind.

        Mr. Taft's opinion arose in an Ohio House race in Huron and Lorain counties where the official count showed a difference of only nine votes between two candidates.

        His opinion governed the hand counting of punch card ballots in that case; and Mr. Blackwell said he would make the same decision if faced with a similar vote-counting dispute.
       

Lone criterion

               The only guidance Ohio election law gives on which ballots count and which don't is a provision saying that no ballot should be counted “which is marked contrary to law, except that no ballot shall be rejected for any technical error unless it is impossible to determine the voter's choice.”

        But Tim Burke, a Democrat who is chairman of the Hamilton County Board of Elections, said county elections boards are free to set their own standards.

        If there were such a dispute in Hamilton County and Mr. Blackwell's office relied on the 1994 Taft opinion, Mr. Burke said, he would consider it “advisory” and not binding.

        Mr. Burke said he thinks that while Mr. Taft's 1994 opinion is “not unreasonable,” local election officials should have the leeway to make determinations about disputed ballots on their own.

        “You have to look at every ballot on a ballot-by-ballot basis to determine what the voter meant to do,” Mr. Burke said.

       



Nordstrom site to become parking lot
Neyer conflict of interest alleged
Alliance seeks $600,000 to promote arts, culture
- Dimpled chads wouldn't fly in Ohio
Bistro reaches out to AIDS groups
Powerball jackpot tops $100 million
The wait for organs to change
Crash kills Ryle athlete
Obituary: Alig hoped to play pro baseball
Protests staging a return in 2000
Educator will take pie in face
Flat boats left trail through time in Cleves
How Bush carried Kentucky
Kentucky Digest
Learning has its ups and downs
Lebanon cable TV suit drags on
Local Digest
Charter school push on again in Ind.
Identity crisis grips Otterbein
Murray loses Scouting museum
Parents who treated boy as girl cleared

 

Latest Headline News
Updated Every 30 Minutes
AP TOP HEADLINE NEWS

Iraqi Official: 150,000 Civilians Dead

Sen. Allen Concedes Defeat in Virginia

Bush, Pelosi Hold White House Talks

Massive Recall of Acetaminophen Underway

Mubarak Warns Against Hanging Saddam

Bolton Unlikely to Win Senate Approval

AP: Startling Findings in Tillman Probe

Ed Bradley of '60 Minutes' Dies at 65

U.S. Rises in Auto Reliability Ratings

49ers Look to Relocate New Stadium



Cincinnati.Com
Search our site by keyword:  
Search also: News | Jobs | Homes | Cars | Classifieds | Obits | Coupons | Events | Dining
Movies/DVDs | Video Games | Hotels | Golf | Visitor's Guide | Maps/Directions | Yellow Pages

  CINCINNATI.COM  |  NKY.COM  |  ENQUIRER  |  CIN WEEKLY  |  Classifieds  |  Cars  |  Homes  |  Jobs  |  Help


Search | Questions/help | News tips | Letters to the editors | Subscribe
Newspaper advertising | Web advertising | Place a classified | Circulation

Copyright 1995-2007. The Cincinnati Enquirer, a Gannett Co. Inc. newspaper.
Use of this site signifies agreement to terms of service updated 12/19/2002.