Cincinnati.Com
NKY.COM  |  ENQUIRER  |  CIN WEEKLY  |  Classifieds  |  Cars  |  Homes  |  Jobs  |  Help
Currently:
64°F
Cloudy
Weather | Traffic
The Enquirer
HOME
NEWS
ENTERTAINMENT
SPORTS
REDS
BENGALS
LOCAL GUIDE
MULTIMEDIA
ARCHIVES
SEARCH
 
 TODAY'S ENQUIRER 
 Front Page 
-- Local News 
 Sports 
 Business 
 Editorials 
 Tempo 
 Home Style 
 Travel 
 Health 
 Technology 
 Weather 
 Back Issues 
 Search 
 Subscribe 

 SPORTS 
 Bearcats 
 Bengals 
 High School 
 Reds 
 Xavier 

 VIEWPOINTS 
 Jim Borgman 
 Columnists 
 Readers' views 

 ENTERTAINMENT 
 Movies 
 Dining 
 Horoscopes 
 Lottery Results 
 Local Events 
 Video Games 

 CINCINNATI.COM 
 Giveaways 
 Maps/Directions 
 Send an E-Postcard 
 Coupons 
 Visitor's Guide 

 CLASSIFIEDS 
 Jobs 
 Cars 
 Homes 
 Obituaries 
 General 
 Place an ad 

 HELP 
 Feedback 
 Subscribe 
 Search 
 Newsroom Directory 




 
Friday, November 24, 2000

The wait for organs to change


Level of sickness will matter more

By Tim Bonfield
The Cincinnati Enquirer

        After a long and bitter national debate, a new kind of waiting list for liver transplants is expected to go into effect next year.

        Cincinnati experts say it probably won't affect the number of liver transplants performed locally, but some predict that more patients will have to wait until they are sicker before they get a transplant.

img
        On Nov. 16, the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) voted to adopt new criteria for allocating donated livers to patients. The system is called the Mayo End-Stage Liver Disease Model (MELD).

        While defenders of the existing organ-sharing system say the change is a large concession, critics say it still doesn't go far enough to end sometimes wide disparities in waiting times among patients in different parts of the country.

        “What this does is eliminate waiting times except as a tie-breaker,” said Dr. Douglas Hanto, director of the adult liver transplant program at University Hospital. “People are ranked in the queue based on the severity of their disease.”

        Under the current system, a donated organ is first offered to the sickest local patient that has a tissue match, then to regional patients, then to other regions. That means a local or regional patient can get an organ even if there's a sicker patient elsewhere in the country.

        Greater Cincinnati, where 35 to 40 adult liver transplants are performed a year, is part of a region that includes the rest of Ohio, Indiana and Michigan.

        The MELD model creates a points system based on how patients fare on tests of liver function, kidney function and blood-clotting ability, all of which reflect the severity of liver disease. The more points, the sicker the patient.

        Under the current system, about 10 percent of the adult patients who get transplants here are considered in the most acute need, now called Status 1. About 20 percent are considered Status 2A and the rest are Status 2B.

        The status categories depend partly on what type of liver disease they have, acute versus chronic; as well as predictions over how long the patient might live without a transplant; and how long a patient has been on the waiting list.

        These categories would be replaced by the point system. The more objective results will mean less dispute over who is really the sickest patient, Dr. Hanto said.

        However, the Campaign for Transplant Fairness, a lobbying group in Washington, D.C., says the MELD system doesn't go far enough. It won't eliminate the regional organ-sharing boundaries, which means a not-as-sick patient in one state could still get a transplant before a sicker patient just across the border.

        “There is plenty of evidence that the current system of organ allocation is not fair and that patients are needlessly dying because they are being overlooked in favor of healthier patients,” said Craig Irwin, president of the National Transplant Action Committee.

        Dr. Hanto, who sits on a UNOS committee that recommended the MELD system, said the idea of a single national waiting list for livers is dead. Instead, there has been much discussion, but no agreement yet, on re-drawing some regional boundaries.

        The region including Cincinnati includes about 25 million people, which many at UNOS consider about the ideal size, Dr. Hanto said. UNOS members felt that it would be best to see how well the MELD system works before trying to re-draw organ allocation regions, he said.

        The regional boundary problems are most severe in New York, California and Texas. Dr. Hanto said none of the border changes proposed so far would change the region including Greater Cincinnati.

       



Nordstrom site to become parking lot
Neyer conflict of interest alleged
Alliance seeks $600,000 to promote arts, culture
Dimpled chads wouldn't fly in Ohio
Bistro reaches out to AIDS groups
Powerball jackpot tops $100 million
- The wait for organs to change
Crash kills Ryle athlete
Obituary: Alig hoped to play pro baseball
Protests staging a return in 2000
Educator will take pie in face
Flat boats left trail through time in Cleves
How Bush carried Kentucky
Kentucky Digest
Learning has its ups and downs
Lebanon cable TV suit drags on
Local Digest
Charter school push on again in Ind.
Identity crisis grips Otterbein
Murray loses Scouting museum
Parents who treated boy as girl cleared

 

Latest Headline News
Updated Every 30 Minutes
AP TOP HEADLINE NEWS

Iraqi Official: 150,000 Civilians Dead

Sen. Allen Concedes Defeat in Virginia

Bush, Pelosi Hold White House Talks

Massive Recall of Acetaminophen Underway

Mubarak Warns Against Hanging Saddam

Bolton Unlikely to Win Senate Approval

AP: Startling Findings in Tillman Probe

Ed Bradley of '60 Minutes' Dies at 65

U.S. Rises in Auto Reliability Ratings

49ers Look to Relocate New Stadium



Cincinnati.Com
Search our site by keyword:  
Search also: News | Jobs | Homes | Cars | Classifieds | Obits | Coupons | Events | Dining
Movies/DVDs | Video Games | Hotels | Golf | Visitor's Guide | Maps/Directions | Yellow Pages

  CINCINNATI.COM  |  NKY.COM  |  ENQUIRER  |  CIN WEEKLY  |  Classifieds  |  Cars  |  Homes  |  Jobs  |  Help


Search | Questions/help | News tips | Letters to the editors | Subscribe
Newspaper advertising | Web advertising | Place a classified | Circulation

Copyright 1995-2007. The Cincinnati Enquirer, a Gannett Co. Inc. newspaper.
Use of this site signifies agreement to terms of service updated 12/19/2002.