Cincinnati.Com
NKY.COM  |  ENQUIRER  |  CIN WEEKLY  |  Classifieds  |  Cars  |  Homes  |  Jobs  |  Help
Currently:
52°F
Partly Cloudy
Weather | Traffic
The Enquirer
HOME
NEWS
ENTERTAINMENT
SPORTS
REDS
BENGALS
LOCAL GUIDE
MULTIMEDIA
ARCHIVES
SEARCH
 
 TODAY'S ENQUIRER 
 Front Page 
-- Local News 
 Sports 
 Business 
 Editorials 
 Tempo 
 Home Style 
 Travel 
 Health 
 Technology 
 Weather 
 Back Issues 
 Search 
 Subscribe 

 SPORTS 
 Bearcats 
 Bengals 
 High School 
 Reds 
 Xavier 

 VIEWPOINTS 
 Jim Borgman 
 Columnists 
 Readers' views 

 ENTERTAINMENT 
 Movies 
 Dining 
 Horoscopes 
 Lottery Results 
 Local Events 
 Video Games 

 CINCINNATI.COM 
 Giveaways 
 Maps/Directions 
 Send an E-Postcard 
 Coupons 
 Visitor's Guide 

 CLASSIFIEDS 
 Jobs 
 Cars 
 Homes 
 Obituaries 
 General 
 Place an ad 

 HELP 
 Feedback 
 Subscribe 
 Search 
 Newsroom Directory 




 
Sunday, November 04, 2001

Killer gets rare chance to be heard


Prosecutors, some judges object to Byrd hearing

By Spencer Hunt
Enquirer Columbus Bureau

        COLUMBUS — Condemned killer John W. Byrd Jr. was almost executed twice pursuant to a death sentence he swears he does not deserve. On Monday, he will get an unprecedented chance to explain why.

        The death row inmate is scheduled to take the stand in a Dayton federal courtroom to talk about what happened the night Colerain Township convenience store clerk Monte Tewksbury was robbed and stabbed to death.

Byrd
Byrd
        Magistrate Michael R. Merz also is expected to hear from John Eastle Brewer, an accomplice to the April 17, 1983, robbery and murder who claims he was the man who plunged the knife in Mr. Tewksbury's side. Mr. Brewer is serving a life prison term.

        These two men lead off five days of dramatic and controversial testimony intended to explore Mr. Byrd's last-ditch appeal that his trial was unfair and that he is “actually innocent” of the charges.

        While the state and Hamilton County prosecutors prepare to argue Mr. Byrd is as guilty now as he was in 1983, they continue to insist the new hearings are illegal.

        To call this case unusual would be an understatement.

        A bitterly divided group of judges at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit stopped Mr. Byrd's Sept. 12 execution, just two days before it was to take place.

        A majority of the court's nine active judges later ordered the hearings to weigh Mr. Brewer's confessions and explore other issues that they decided haven't been fully considered by state courts.

        Among those issues is a claim that a jailhouse informant lied on the stand to help prosecutors convict Mr. Byrd.

        Also undealt with is a recently revealed statement from a man named Robert Pottinger who said Mr. Byrd was passed out in the get-away truck when a second robbery occurred. Prosecutors tried to place Mr. Byrd at that robbery to imply he was the man who carried the knife into a second store.

        Mr. Pottinger is scheduled to testify Tuesday. A group of former Hamilton County jailhouse inmates who swear informant Ronald Armstead made up his story also will testify.

        Even the attorneys will take the stand. Ohio Public Defender David Bodiker is scheduled to speak Wednesday and former Hamilton County prosecutor Daniel Breyer testifies Thursday.

        As each new person takes the stand, a fundamental question of whether these hearings are actually legal remains unanswered.

        In a rare public display of outrage, at least four 6th Circuit judges blasted the decision as lawless. They said no federal law grants the court majority the right to stop the execution and reopen the case.

        Ohio Attorney General Betty Montgomery echoes those arguments in an appeal that asks the U.S. Supreme Court to void the hearings. It's not clear the high court will step in before the proceedings conclude Friday.

        State courts dismissed Mr. Brewer's confessions as unbelievable and too late. The state public defender's office took Mr. Brewer's first confession in 1989 but never used it until January, when Mr. Byrd had exhausted all of his guaranteed appeals.

        The state first attempted to execute Mr. Byrd in 1994. The U.S. Supreme Court halted the execution hours before it was to take place, ruling that he was unfairly denied a federal appeal.

       



Incumbent delivers subtle message as race winds down
Challenger hopes winds of change carry him to win
EDITORIAL: Why this election matters
Local races have close-up impact
Officers' acquittals the norm nationally
Program asks parents to promote diversity
Tristate A.M. Report
Troupe dances circles around its disabilities
BRONSON: Sticking point
HOWARD: Some Good News
PULFER: Suburbs watch
Block party rules upset some residents
Council race no contest in growing city
Mill Creek gets trees, shrubs
- Killer gets rare chance to be heard
Boone Co. GOP rethinking Alexander
Fans' own rubber meets pavement
Growth stirs land debate
Jailbreak site now history HQ
Kentucky News Briefs
Ludlow officials get ready to pick a new police chief
Tighter lid on 'open records'

 

Latest Headline News
Updated Every 30 Minutes
AP TOP HEADLINE NEWS

Iraqi Official: 150,000 Civilians Dead

Sen. Allen Concedes Defeat in Virginia

Bush, Pelosi Hold White House Talks

Massive Recall of Acetaminophen Underway

Mubarak Warns Against Hanging Saddam

Bolton Unlikely to Win Senate Approval

AP: Startling Findings in Tillman Probe

Ed Bradley of '60 Minutes' Dies at 65

U.S. Rises in Auto Reliability Ratings

49ers Look to Relocate New Stadium



Cincinnati.Com
Search our site by keyword:  
Search also: News | Jobs | Homes | Cars | Classifieds | Obits | Coupons | Events | Dining
Movies/DVDs | Video Games | Hotels | Golf | Visitor's Guide | Maps/Directions | Yellow Pages

  CINCINNATI.COM  |  NKY.COM  |  ENQUIRER  |  CIN WEEKLY  |  Classifieds  |  Cars  |  Homes  |  Jobs  |  Help


Search | Questions/help | News tips | Letters to the editors | Subscribe
Newspaper advertising | Web advertising | Place a classified | Circulation

Copyright 1995-2007. The Cincinnati Enquirer, a Gannett Co. Inc. newspaper.
Use of this site signifies agreement to terms of service updated 12/19/2002.