Cincinnati.Com
NKY.COM  |  ENQUIRER  |  CIN WEEKLY  |  Classifieds  |  Cars  |  Homes  |  Jobs  |  Help
Currently:
48°F
Cloudy
Weather | Traffic
The Enquirer
HOME
NEWS
ENTERTAINMENT
SPORTS
REDS
BENGALS
LOCAL GUIDE
MULTIMEDIA
ARCHIVES
SEARCH
 
 TODAY'S ENQUIRER 
 Front Page 
-- Local News 
 Sports 
 Business 
 Editorials 
 Tempo 
 Home Style 
 Travel 
 Health 
 Technology 
 Weather 
 Back Issues 
 Search 
 Subscribe 

 SPORTS 
 Bearcats 
 Bengals 
 High School 
 Reds 
 Xavier 

 VIEWPOINTS 
 Jim Borgman 
 Columnists 
 Readers' views 

 ENTERTAINMENT 
 Movies 
 Dining 
 Horoscopes 
 Lottery Results 
 Local Events 
 Video Games 

 CINCINNATI.COM 
 Giveaways 
 Maps/Directions 
 Send an E-Postcard 
 Coupons 
 Visitor's Guide 

 CLASSIFIEDS 
 Jobs 
 Cars 
 Homes 
 Obituaries 
 General 
 Place an ad 

 HELP 
 Feedback 
 Subscribe 
 Search 
 Newsroom Directory 




 
Saturday, February 02, 2002

Enron has Bunning backpedaling


Senator once fought accounting restriction

By Patrick Crowley
The Cincinnati Enquirer

        Kentucky U.S. Sen. Jim Bunning is backing off his opposition to a proposed federal regulation designed to discourage the cozy accounting practices that resulted in scandal for failed Enron Corp. and its accountant, Arthur Andersen.

        Federal government watchdog Common Cause and others have charged that the relationship between Enron and Arthur Andersen was a potential conflict of interest because at the same time Andersen was auditing the troubled energy company's books it also held a lucrative consulting contract with Enron.

        But in July of 2000, Mr. Bunning — a Southgate Republican who has taken thousands of dollars in campaign contributions from the accounting industry — joined nine of his Senate colleagues to slow implementation of a rule that would have barred accounting firms from auditing and consulting for the same company.

        Common Cause has said Arthur Andersen's dual roles may have led the firm to overlook or minimize Enron's accounting irregularities. Congressional and criminal investigators are looking into allegations of document shredding and false information included in Andersen's audits of Enron's books.

        In an interview last week, Mr. Bunning, a member of the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee, said his opposition in July to the proposed Securities and Exchange Commission rule on accounting firms “seemed to make sense.”

        “It does not make sense now after Enron,” he said. “There will be a reexamination of that position due to Enron ... because it looks like a pretty good idea now.”

        But Mr. Bunning reacted with a strongly worded denial to a Jan. 23 report in The Hill, a Capitol Hill newspaper, that he was among a group of Senators who threatened the SEC's funding if the rule were implemented.

        “What a bunch of (expletive),” he said. “You can quote me.”

        Mr. Bunning said he made no such threats and the SEC funding was not cut. He did release a July 28, 2000, letter he and nine other members of the Senate Banking committee signed that asked former SEC Chairman Arthur Levitt to slow implementation of accounting firm regulation the chairman had proposed.

        But Mr. Bunning said the letter was sent because Republicans and Democrats — including Sen. Evan Bayh of Indiana — on the committee were concerned that Mr. Levitt was attempting to circumvent the legislative process by drafting the proposed rule change.

        “Banking committee members objected to the fact that the head of the SEC was trying to make a rule rather than letting the law come through the committee,” Mr. Bunning said. “We didn't think that was the right way to do it.”

        Mr. Bunning's staff pointed out that in the July 2000 letter to Mr. Levitt, the Senators do not make overt comments opposing the rule. They ask only that its implementation be delayed “in order to fully evaluate the impact of your proposal ... (and) allow for careful analysis of the proposed changes.”

        The letter, however, was released by Mr. Bunning and Mr. Bayh only in mid-January, after Common Cause called on thee senators to divulge all correspondence on the proposed rule change.

        Other banking committee members to sign the letter were Republicans Rod Grams of Minnesota, Phil Gramm of Texas, Mike Crapo of Idaho, Robert Bennett of Utah, Wayne Allard of Colorado, Chuck Hagel of Nebraska, Rick Santorum of Pennsylvania and Democrat Charles Schumer of New York.

        The accounting industry worked hard to prevent implementation of the rule, according to Washington-based Common Cause, which tracks political contributions through the Federal Election Commission.

        Andersen, other large accounting firms and the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants — the accounting industry's trade and lobbying group — contributed more than $27 million to federal candidates and political parties between 1991 and 2001, Common Cause found in an analysis of campaign finance reports.

        Between Jan. 1, 1999, and Dec. 31, 2000, Mr. Bunning took $8,500 and Mr. Bayh received $9,074 from the accounting industry, Common Cause found.

        And according to the Center for Responsive Politics in Washington, which also tracks campaign finances, Mr. Bunning's campaign contributions from the accounting industry totaled $71,000 since 1995 with Mr. Bayh receiving more than $90,000.

        Common Cause President Scott Harshbarger said one of the main reasons the accounting industry was making contributions was to kill or slow the proposed rule change.

        “One of their top goals was to maintain their lucrative consulting revenues from their audit clients,” Mr. Harshbarger said in a Jan. 16 statement.

        In November of 2000, the SEC enacted a compromise rule that permitted consulting and auditing services to be provided by the same firm under certain additional guidelines.

        During 2000, Andersen was paid $25 million to audit Enron's books while at the same time receiving a $27 million consulting contracting, according to documents filed with the SEC.

        Given the situation with Andersen and Enron — now in the largest bankruptcy in U.S. history — the Senate Banking Committee is likely to revisit the proposed SEC rule, Mr. Bunning said.

        “We always suspect people are honest, particularly Big Five accounting firms,” he said. “But certain members of accounting firms look the other way if audits don't turn out clean.

        “We may reexamine those situations and not allow (accounting) firms that are auditors also be financial advisers, or consultants, at the same time,” he said.

        Along with Andersen, the Big Five accounting firms are PricewaterhouseCoopers, KPMG, Deloitte & Touche and Ernst & Young.

        The Louisville Courier-Journal and Enquirer wire services contributed to this report.
       

       



City fights for drug exclusion zone
Asbestos puts scare in workers
Eight 'graduates' joining city police
Priest from Uganda mourned
Tamer Mardi Gras in works
Antarctic visits recounted
Girl, 16, charged with vehicular homicide
'Souper Bowl' feeds hungry
Tristate A.M. Report
Villages unite to improve
Vine St. overseer begins city job
Whitewater land bought for parks
THOMPSON: Faith Matters
MCNUTT: Warren County
SAMPLES: Historical, spiritual nonfiction?
WELLS: The Cheney syndrome
Butler Co. sister has only hope
3-year-old DNA sample leads to arrest in rape
Family says goodbye to matriarch
Trials in Lebanon likely done
McConnell raises $3.5 million
- Enron has Bunning backpedaling
Federal funds sought for sidewalks
Kentucky News Briefs
Ky. man charged in pair of rapes
Local 'stars' get air time in GED show
Lucas' challenger gets funds

 

Latest Headline News
Updated Every 30 Minutes
AP TOP HEADLINE NEWS

Iraqi Official: 150,000 Civilians Dead

Sen. Allen Concedes Defeat in Virginia

Bush, Pelosi Hold White House Talks

Massive Recall of Acetaminophen Underway

Mubarak Warns Against Hanging Saddam

Bolton Unlikely to Win Senate Approval

AP: Startling Findings in Tillman Probe

Ed Bradley of '60 Minutes' Dies at 65

U.S. Rises in Auto Reliability Ratings

49ers Look to Relocate New Stadium



Cincinnati.Com
Search our site by keyword:  
Search also: News | Jobs | Homes | Cars | Classifieds | Obits | Coupons | Events | Dining
Movies/DVDs | Video Games | Hotels | Golf | Visitor's Guide | Maps/Directions | Yellow Pages

  CINCINNATI.COM  |  NKY.COM  |  ENQUIRER  |  CIN WEEKLY  |  Classifieds  |  Cars  |  Homes  |  Jobs  |  Help


Search | Questions/help | News tips | Letters to the editors | Subscribe
Newspaper advertising | Web advertising | Place a classified | Circulation

Copyright 1995-2007. The Cincinnati Enquirer, a Gannett Co. Inc. newspaper.
Use of this site signifies agreement to terms of service updated 12/19/2002.