Cincinnati.Com
NKY.COM  |  ENQUIRER  |  CIN WEEKLY  |  Classifieds  |  Cars  |  Homes  |  Jobs  |  Help
Currently:
59°F
Cloudy
Weather | Traffic
The Enquirer
HOME
NEWS
ENTERTAINMENT
SPORTS
REDS
BENGALS
LOCAL GUIDE
MULTIMEDIA
ARCHIVES
SEARCH
 
 TODAY'S ENQUIRER 
 Front Page 
-- Local News 
 Sports 
 Business 
 Editorials 
 Tempo 
 Home Style 
 Travel 
 Health 
 Technology 
 Weather 
 Back Issues 
 Search 
 Subscribe 

 SPORTS 
 Bearcats 
 Bengals 
 High School 
 Reds 
 Xavier 

 VIEWPOINTS 
 Jim Borgman 
 Columnists 
 Readers' views 

 ENTERTAINMENT 
 Movies 
 Dining 
 Horoscopes 
 Lottery Results 
 Local Events 
 Video Games 

 CINCINNATI.COM 
 Giveaways 
 Maps/Directions 
 Send an E-Postcard 
 Coupons 
 Visitor's Guide 

 CLASSIFIEDS 
 Jobs 
 Cars 
 Homes 
 Obituaries 
 General 
 Place an ad 

 HELP 
 Feedback 
 Subscribe 
 Search 
 Newsroom Directory 




 
Thursday, February 21, 2002

Study links teacher quality and student progress


Best teachers' students score higher on tests

By Jennifer Mrozowski
The Cincinnati Enquirer

        Teachers who rate highest under Cincinnati Public Schools' teacher evaluation system also show the greatest gains, on average, in their students' achievement on proficiency tests.

        That's according to a study of students and teachers in grades 3-8 released by the district Wednesday.

        The study gives a vote of confidence to the nearly 2-year-old teacher evaluation system. In May, the district could become one of the first in the nation to tie teachers' performance on the evaluation system to their raises and pay cuts.

        “This study means teacher quality is a key component to determining student success and achievement,” said Sue Taylor, president of the Cincinnati Federation of Teachers. “It's gratifying to have empirical evidence to show the correlation between excellence in teaching and raising student achievement.”

        She said it's also a validation that the evaluation system is on the right track.

        The study showed, for instance, that students of teachers rated “unsatisfactory,” the lowest rating for teachers, scored as much as 13 points below what they would be expected to score on science proficiency tests, based on predicted averages. Math test scores for students of those same teachers were 9 points below expected outcomes.

        For students of teachers rated “distinguished,” the highest rating for teachers, science scores were 3 points above expected averages. Math scores were also 3 points higher than predicted.

        The teachers' union or the board of education still could vote against linking pay to teacher performance. But district officials were encouraged by the study's results.

        “The study found the basic design of the teacher evaluation system is sound and is worth continuing,” said Jack Lewis, the district's director of research and evaluation.

        Kathleen Ware, the district's associate superintendent, said the evaluation system is “demystifying teaching.” The system is intended to improve teacher skills, and thus student achievement, by creating specific standards teachers are expected to meet.

        For the study, the district looked at individual students' achievement on proficiency tests in 2000 and 2001. They then compared the student improvement rates to teachers' ratings under the evaluation system. Results of about 180 teachers of the 370 undergoing comprehensive evaluations were analyzed for part of the study.

        Teachers who received the top rating of “distinguished” on average showed the greatest gains in student achievement. Teachers who received on average the lowest rating of “unsatisfactory” showed the weakest gains in student achievement.

        The evaluation system measures teachers on 17 standards, including whether tests and assessments teachers give students are aligned with the district's standards, and whether teachers demonstrate content knowledge and use content-specific instructional strategies.

        Under the system, every teacher has an annual evaluation. During a four-year phase-in, only teachers new to the district, most fourth-year teachers and those having serious performance deficiencies are required to undergo what's called a comprehensive evaluation.

        Teachers undergoing the comprehensive evaluation have to provide a portfolio of their work and must have five to six classroom observations by administrators and trained teacher evaluators. Beginning in 2005, all teachers will go through a comprehensive evaluation every five years.

        Letitia West, a Mount Washington Elementary School teacher with 23 years experience, was one of the teachers who scored the top rating.

        “You have to work hard to get those scores,” she said. “Generally people who are working hard to do well on the evaluation system are also those who work hard in the classroom.”

        The process was time-consuming and arduous, she said. For example, the evaluation system rates teachers on how well they inform families on the social and academic progress of students, so Ms. West keeps parents informed through calls, conferences and a newsletter.

        Another component is making sure students' lessons help them meet district standards and aren't just work to keep them busy.

        “I make sure the work that they do is worth doing,” Ms. West said said.

        Ms. Taylor said that, although the study validated the teacher evaluation system, the union still has yet to collect data to find out if teachers are willing to tie their performance on the evaluations to their pay. That data collection should begin in March, she said.

        The study “will be a very important factor for teachers to determine the level of their support for the pay-for-performance system,” she said. “But there's still work to be done to make sure teachers understand the design of pay-for-performance.”

        Teachers with 16 or more years of experience can opt not to tie their pay to performance. If voted out, the evaluation system would still continue, without the link to pay.

        The study examined students in grades 3-8. High school test results were not used because proficiency tests may be taken once or multiple times over several grades, making comparisons difficult. Students younger than third grade either do not take proficiency tests or there are no meaningful ways to compare scores that are available.

       



Trauma center plans in limbo
- Study links teacher quality and student progress
County assured its share of U.S. security funding
Runaway cow spotted again in park
Chabot foe drops out of election
Council plans public hearing on panhandling proposal
Higher mental health levy to be on May ballot
Irish-Catholic mom recalls Belfast terror
Juror's arrest ordered after she drops out of deliberation
Luken says come on down
Man to take family back to Mexico
Prince won't be here for concert
Robberies strike bank, credit union in area
Tristate A.M. Report
HOWARD: Some Good News
PULFER: The Tewksburys
RADEL: Kathman recovers
Butler Co. Transit to end one route, change another
Class gets peek inside Olympics
Drivin' and gabbin' still allowed in Germantown
Event exposes women to math careers
Hispanics adding to local mix
Job, pay cuts urged for Lebanon
Lebanon asked to ditch meters
Teacher resigns over porn surfing
Alton Coleman on deck?
Attorney's license could be suspended
Covington board OKs new pub
Ky. Senate OKs abortion bills
NKU can build training center
Scrap-wood fire spreads, damages pallet company
Senate panel approves anti-telemarketing bill
Water works change likely to flow easily

 

Latest Headline News
Updated Every 30 Minutes
AP TOP HEADLINE NEWS

Iraqi Official: 150,000 Civilians Dead

Sen. Allen Concedes Defeat in Virginia

Bush, Pelosi Hold White House Talks

Massive Recall of Acetaminophen Underway

Mubarak Warns Against Hanging Saddam

Bolton Unlikely to Win Senate Approval

AP: Startling Findings in Tillman Probe

Ed Bradley of '60 Minutes' Dies at 65

U.S. Rises in Auto Reliability Ratings

49ers Look to Relocate New Stadium



Cincinnati.Com
Search our site by keyword:  
Search also: News | Jobs | Homes | Cars | Classifieds | Obits | Coupons | Events | Dining
Movies/DVDs | Video Games | Hotels | Golf | Visitor's Guide | Maps/Directions | Yellow Pages

  CINCINNATI.COM  |  NKY.COM  |  ENQUIRER  |  CIN WEEKLY  |  Classifieds  |  Cars  |  Homes  |  Jobs  |  Help


Search | Questions/help | News tips | Letters to the editors | Subscribe
Newspaper advertising | Web advertising | Place a classified | Circulation

Copyright 1995-2007. The Cincinnati Enquirer, a Gannett Co. Inc. newspaper.
Use of this site signifies agreement to terms of service updated 12/19/2002.