WASHINGTON — Leaders of a Kentucky community college lost a free speech case that asked the Supreme Court if a college instructor had a constitutional right to use racial slurs in class as part of a discussion of hurtful communication.

        Complaints about the lesson cost the teacher his job, and the court had been urged to use his dismissal to decide whether the First Amendment applies to all on-the-job speech. Justices declined Monday, without comment, to review an appeal from the teacher's superiors.

        An appeals court said Kenneth Hardy, who taught communications classes at a two-year college in Louisville, could sue the college president and dean claiming they retaliated against him for his comments.

        Mr. Hardy had asked students in his interpersonal communication class to examine how language is used to hurt classes of people. He sought examples from students and they discussed derogatory terms for blacks, homosexuals and women.

        His superiors' lawyer said that Mr. Hardy was speaking as a college employee and cannot claim his constitutional rights were violated. Had he made comments away from work, it's clear he had a right to do so. Courts have reached various conclusions in employee speech cases.

        “The argument that teachers have no First Amendment rights when teaching, or that the government can censor teacher speech without restriction, is totally unpersuasive,” the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said last year in siding with Hardy.

        The college president's lawyer, John G. Roberts, said the appeals court “sharply reduced the flexibility enjoyed by public employers to regulate those who speak on their behalf.”

        Mr. Hardy taught from 1995-98 at Jefferson Community College, the largest two-year college in the Kentucky system with about 9,500 students and multiple campuses. Court records show he was popular with students.

        A black student, however, complained about the 1998 lesson. The student contacted a local civil rights activist, who met with the president and demanded Mr. Hardy's dismissal, according to Mr. Hardy's lawyer.

        Mr. Hardy is suing Richard Green, who was the college president, and Mary Pamela Besser, a dean, in their individual capacities. The state college has protection from lawsuits.

        Mr. Hardy contends his use of controversial words prompted the college to end his teaching duties after the 1998 summer semester. The college claims his teaching methods were one of the causes, according to records.

        The Supreme Court said in 1968 that employees like teachers can comment on matters of public concern. Justices have never given specific guidelines for such cases.

        “Because the essence of a teacher's role is to prepare students for their place in society as responsible citizens, classroom instruction will often fall within the Supreme Court's broad conception of "public concern,”' the appeals court wrote.

        The case is Besser v. Hardy, 01-936.

Kentucky loses out on Hyundai
Fans: Now, this is baseball
Peevish cow passes on parade
RADEL: Reds as unifier
PULFER: How to gripe more effectively
SAMPLES: Easter Dogs
Some Good News
Area roads stack up well
Battle of theaters looms
Cincinnati youth to partake in racial diversity rally
Funerals arranged for three in crash
Lebanon looks to the past
Profiling resolution talks go on
Pyramid Hill offers concerts, kids' programs
Trash turned into mascot
Two indicted in printer cartridge theft
Warren leaders want consensus
Observer: Cincinnati is a hidden treasure
Officer fired for leaving scene of accident
Ohio gives none to anti-smoking effort
Suspect's trial begins in $1 death
Tristate A.M. Report
100-year-old poem of Kentucky heard around the world
Burlington Pro closing after more than 60 years
County readies reinstatement welfare rules
Court passes on free speech case
GOP contenders act cordially
High Court turns down payday lending customers' case
House ready to pass Ky. budget
Miners win black lung legislation
Kentucky digest