Tuesday, August 27, 2002

Ben-Mar settlement blocked


Tony Erpenbeck holding out for more

By James McNair jmcnair@enquirer.com
The Cincinnati Enquirer

        After more than seven years of rounding up assets in the Ben-Mar Investments bankruptcy case, only one obstacle is blocking the partial payback of investors' money: a claim for a bigger share by one of the investors.

        Tony Erpenbeck, a retired home builder and Crestview Hills resident, is holding out for a sum larger than the $43,730 he and his wife, Phyllis, are due to receive in the initial disbursement of U.S. Bankruptcy Court trustee Richard Nelson. The couple invested $497,000.

FAMILIAR NAME
    Tony Erpenbeck is better known these days as the father of Bill Erpenbeck, whose home building company collapsed in April, prompting an FBI bank fraud investigation that is still under way.
    Tony Erpenbeck owned 1 percent of the Erpenbeck Co. and provided financial assistance in a failed effort to prop it up.
    Various members of the Erpenbeck family stand to receive about $150,000 - from an original investment of $1.7 million - if the court approves the plan as is.
        Mr. Nelson is ready to write checks totaling $1.15 million to cover 345 claims, but he must first persuade the court to approve his repayment plan.

        Ben-Mar Investments folded in 1995 after receiving more than $13 million from investors, mostly Northern Kentuckians, who had no idea their money was being used to bet on the direction of the stock market. One of its principals, Mark Gatch, has already served a 2 1/2-year prison sentence, while the other, Benjamin Schmidt, was indicted last week for bankruptcy fraud and obstruction of justice.

        The Ben-Mar collapse cost Mr. Schmidt his three-story mansion in Crestview Hills and left him in financial ruin, but he continued to receive support from his friend and neighbor - Mr. Erpenbeck. According to testimony given by Mr. Schmidt in bankruptcy court, Mr. Erpenbeck lent him his car from time to time and helped bankroll a Schmidt business venture in Pigeon Forge, Tenn.

THE FIRST PAYOUT
  What the biggest victims in the Ben-Mar Investments claimed in damages and what they will receive in the first court-sponsored return of investors' money:
  • Ken Anderson $86,346 $7,598
  • Lawrence Bowling 212,596 18,707
  • Bruce and Kathy Coslet 142,184 12,511
  • Richard Dean 488,961 43,025
  • Basheer David 125,047 11,003
  • L.R. Deininger 195,817 17,230
  • E.H. Roeding Insur. 274,226 24,130
  • The Erpenbeck Co. 135,000 11,879
  • Bill Erpenbeck 683,491 60,142
  • Tony Erpenbeck 496,975 43,730
  Gary Erpenbeck 113,750 10,009
  • J. Thomas Feagan 155,862 13,715
  • Arthur Fisher J. 254,034 22,353
  • Kenneth Heil 200,000 17,598
  • Paul Hemmer Constr. 110,000 9,679
  • Dave Lannigan 265,698 14,580
  • Thomas Lonneman 225,000 19,798
  • Ann Marie Mergard 264,316 23,258
  • D.H. Mergard 277,870 24,450
  • Tim & Kimberly Moore 256,961 22,611
  • Harry Oelerich 142,519 12,541
  • Dallas Sandlin 630,000 55,435
  • E.C. Vermillion 380,310 33,464
  • Martin Wade 467,227 41,112
  • Waterfront Properties 217,060 19,100
  • Robert Windhorn 146,466 12,888
  Source: Richard Nelson, U.S. Bankruptcy Court trustee
 

        Mr. Erpenbeck's assistance extended to the events that led to last week's criminal charges against Mr. Schmidt. The U.S. Attorney's office in Cincinnati accused Mr. Schmidt of stripping appliances, fixtures, moldings and shrubs from the $680,000 house he surrendered to the bankruptcy trustee in 1998. Even though Mr. Erpenbeck was trying to recover $497,000 from the insolvent Ben-Mar, he allowed Mr. Schmidt to store items removed from his house - including chandeliers and drapery hardware - in his basement.

        “Tony's place was free, so that's where I put most everything,” Mr. Schmidt said in a June 1998 deposition.

        The Erpenbecks were among the biggest losers in the ill-fated Ben-Mar scheme and aren't ready to settle for the $43,730 that Mr. Nelson proposes they receive, although it is in proportion to the payouts to others. In his formal objection, Cincinnati lawyer Joseph Dehner said “certain amounts he (Mr. Erpenbeck) lost had not been included in the totals known to the court.”

        Mr. Dehner did not specify an amount. He was out of town Monday and did not return a telephone call for comment.

        Mr. Nelson said Monday he would oppose Mr. Erpenbeck's request for more money.

        “He's getting, in my opinion, the same percentage as everyone else, based on the amount of his allowed claim,” Mr. Nelson said.

        The trustee raised the $1.15 million by liquidating bank accounts and receiving the proceeds of asset sales, including those of Mr. Schmidt's and Mr. Gatch's homes. The amount is less than nine percent of the $13.1 million that people invested.

       



- Ben-Mar settlement blocked
Wal-Mart eyes Eastgate expansion
Home sales skid on N.Ky. losses
Tristate summary
What's the Buzz?
Morning Memo
Some airport screeners raised rates for feds
Seniors warned about swindlers
Music sales decline blamed on Internet
NY hotels filling up near ground zero
WorldCom controller tried to silence concerns
Beer, liquor lobbies press for cut in sin taxes
Beer barrel becoming thing of past