Tuesday, August 27, 2002

Confidentiality on trial in Baker case




By Janice Morse jmorse@enquirer.com
The Cincinnati Enquirer

        DAYTON, Ohio - A three-judge panel is trying to decide whether “may testify” actually means “shall testify“ in the case of an attorney who has refused to disclose what her now-deceased client may have shared about the fate of a 9-year-old girl who disappeared from her suburban neighborhood in 1999.

        A standing-room-only crowd of 44 people listened at an hour-long hearing Monday in the Ohio 2nd District Court of Appeals as lawyers made complicated legal arguments about whether Beth Lewis should be held in contempt or jailed for maintaining confidences of Jan Marie Franks, who might have said what happened to Erica Baker.

        “I have really high hopes that we're going to be able to get something good out of this,” Erica's father, Greg, said after the hearing.

        The case may hold the key to “what happened to a little girl who went out to walk her dog on a rainy Sunday and was never seen again,” said Carley Ingram, a Montgomery County assistant prosecutor.

        While an attorney's oath to keep clients' secrets often serves an important public interest, it also can deprive fact-finders of important information, Ms. Ingram pointed out.

        Further, she said, Ohio law spells out the circumstances under which that promise of confidentiality can - or must - be broken. She argued that this case meets those criteria, noting the law says if a surviving spouse executes a waiver of confidentiality, the attorney may testify. And, in this case, she argues, that means the lawyer must testify.

        But Cincinnati attorney John P. Feldmeier saw the same set of facts differently.

        “Beth Lewis is the only person alive who knows what her client's interests were with respect to those communications,“ Mr. Feldmeier argued.

        Mr. Feldmeier warned that if the lower court's decision is allowed to stand, saying Ms. Lewis ought to be compelled to disclose her client's confidences, “We've opened up the floodgates...We've inflicted uncertainty on all attorney-client relationships.“

       



Bad-check charge against Erpenbeck dismissed
Lawsuit against boycotters dismissed
Transit tax levy faces opposition
Suspect in child killings could face death
Twitty grand jury continues
Green's no-show blamed on illness, not boycott
PULFER: Physician consults a specialist
RADEL: Sweet memories of downtown
First day of school typical, radical
Man sets fire to home after domestic fight
Medicare supporters visit Anderson Twp.
Nurses plan to hand out 50,000 ID cards
Police hold man for multiple burglaries
Two men indicted on rape charges
Good News: Bag litter problem at Riverfest
Blue Ash, sister city kick off idea exchange
Celebration Bus seeks Reds fans' signatures
Congrats
Butler officials feel pain of reappraisal
Hamilton fires officer accused of violence
Hamilton open for baseball team
Design unveiled for new Monroe district campus
Tour gets kids ready for school
Waste treatment resumes with loaner pump
3 firms bid for Kings' rehab plans
Baseball club treasurer indicted in theft
Cleveland man likely died of West Nile virus
- Confidentiality on trial in Baker case
Gov. Taft expected to campaign for math
Aquarium reels in director locally
Baseball team names pour in
Campbell schools to start drug tests
Foes at odds on dispatch merger
TANK: Lawyers trying to jack up land price
Voluntary water restriction almost over
15 locations cited for selling alcohol to minor
Police criticized for records failures