Saturday, September 14, 2002
Kenton Co. boasts DUI convictions
Political opponent questions credit, scrutinizes statistics
By Patrick Crowley, email@example.com
The Cincinnati Enquirer
COVINGTON Ninety-five percent of the people charged with drunk driving in Kenton County during the second quarter of this year were convicted, according to County Attorney Garry Edmondson.
The rate was an increase over his office's 94 percent conviction during the first three months of the year and is a result of aggressive law enforcement and prosecution along with a police officer education program, Mr. Edmondson, the county's lead prosecutor, said in a press release he issued this week.
Many people risk drinking and driving because they do not believe they will be caught, said Mr. Edmondson, a Fort Wright Republican running for re-election in the fall. That simply is not true in Kenton County. Our police officers will arrest drunk drivers and my office will convict them.
Mr. Edmondson said officers from seven area departments achieved a 100 percent conviction rate: Ludlow, Villa Hills, Edgewood, Taylor Mill, Lakeside Park/Crestview Hills, Park Hills and the Kenton County and Boone County sheriff's departments.
Park Hills posted the 100 percent conviction rate for the second straight quarter.
Crescent Springs Democrat Kate Molloy, who is challenging Mr. Edmondson in the fall, questioned the timing of the release.
It seems we always get information like this from Mr. Edmondson at election time, said Ms. Molloy, a lawyer with the Covington law firm of Arnzen and Wentz.
Mr. Edmondson said the statistics for the period between April and June of this year are only coming out now because it takes time to compile the statistics from the 293 DUI cases his office handled during that period.
It's a laborious process, Mr. Edmondson said Thursday night. We literally take every file and go over it, analyzing it, and finding how we handled the case. And then compile all the data.
I'm not sure she understands the issue, he said. If she wants to challenge the statistics, she should come down to the clerk's office, pull out every case we handled, look at them and tell me what she would have done differently.
Ms. Molloy commended the police departments with the 100 percent conviction rates, which she said probably had more to do with how the police officers performed than how Mr. Edmondson and his assistant prosecutors handled the cases.
Though she offered no specifics, Ms. Molloy said from her conversations with area police officers the departments' relationship with the county attorney's office is not a good one.
Mr. Edmondson said there are occasions when his assistant prosecutors clash with police officers over how a case should be prosecuted.
But my office has an excellent relationship with the police, he said. We were endorsed by the (Fraternal Order of Police unions) in the primary ... and we hope to get those endorsements again.
Of the nearly 300 DUI cases prosecuted, Mr. Edmondson said 12 had to be amended because the blood-alcohol level was too low for conviction or the arresting officer failed to provide a blood alcohol level or any field sobriety test during the defendant's trial.
That's a high number of amended cases, said Ms. Molloy. This isn't a knock on the police, but if Garry Edmondson is educating police officers as he claims those cases shouldn't be amended for those reasons.
Mr. Edmondson said most of the 12 cases were amended during trials. He said in one particular case a defendant had a blood-alcohol level of .08 the level a driver is presumed drunk under Kentucky law but a judge amended the case because he did not believe the defendant was drunk.
Based on evidence brought out in the trial the judge said the defendant was tipsy but not under the influence, Mr. Edmondson said. Those things happen in trials. But we do work hard on educating officers. That's one of the reasons we go over every case, so we can show officers what they might have done wrong. And it's paid off when you look at our conviction rate. E-mail pcrowleyenqui
ials. He said in one particular case a defendant had a blood-alcohol level of .08 the level a driver is presumed drunk under Kentucky law but a judge amended the case because he did not believe the defendant was drunk.
Based on evidence brought out in the trial the judge said the defendant was tipsy but not under the influence, Mr. Edmondson said. Those things happen in trials. But we do work hard on educating officers. That's one of the reasons we go over every case, so we can show officers what they might have done wrong. And it's paid off when you look at our conviction rate.
DUIFrom Page DUI: Kenton County convictions boasted
Driving on Tylersville Road? Pack a lunch
2 suspects rooted out as tree cutters
Local crops small, wilted
Patrol focuses on teen driver
Ravenous coyotes hunted
Send us questions about Mason, Deerfield Twp.
Golf aided Bill Backs' drive to career in law
Jews unite to reflect
Latina urges bridge building
Photographer can leave prison
Student from UC to be on game show
Tristate A.M. Report
CROWLEY: Political notebook
GUTIERREZ: Michael Carneal
RADEL: Toast to bakeries
Man indicted in stabbing and shooting
Mason reviews sewer bills after complaints of charges
Meeting on project encourages residents
Queen Anne house demolished
Violent week adds shooting
Warren annexation fight ends
Clinton: Hagan needs $2M more to beat Taft
Ohio chief justice objects to proposed drug-treatment law
Candidate under fire over gay fund-raiser
Covington points out its neighborhoods
E-mail angers Covington mayor
Emergency teams to get $5 million
Kenton Co. boasts DUI convictions
Kentucky News Briefs
Legislator: Make Ky. State part of another school
School districts warned of imposter
School settles suit over flag T-shirt
Senate candidates spar over Transpark