Cincinnati.Com
NKY.COM  |  ENQUIRER  |  CIN WEEKLY  |  Classifieds  |  Cars  |  Homes  |  Jobs  |  Help
Currently:
80°F
Mostly Sunny
Weather | Traffic
The Enquirer
HOME
NEWS
ENTERTAINMENT
SPORTS
REDS
BENGALS
LOCAL GUIDE
MULTIMEDIA
ARCHIVES
SEARCH
 
 TODAY'S ENQUIRER 
 Front Page 
-- Local News 
 Sports 
 Business 
 Editorials 
 Tempo 
 Home Style 
 Travel 
 Health 
 Technology 
 Weather 
 Back Issues 
 Search 
 Subscribe 

 SPORTS 
 Bearcats 
 Bengals 
 High School 
 Reds 
 Xavier 

 VIEWPOINTS 
 Jim Borgman 
 Columnists 
 Readers' views 

 ENTERTAINMENT 
 Movies 
 Dining 
 Horoscopes 
 Lottery Results 
 Local Events 
 Video Games 

 CINCINNATI.COM 
 Giveaways 
 Maps/Directions 
 Send an E-Postcard 
 Coupons 
 Visitor's Guide 

 CLASSIFIEDS 
 Jobs 
 Cars 
 Homes 
 Obituaries 
 General 
 Place an ad 

 HELP 
 Feedback 
 Subscribe 
 Search 
 Newsroom Directory 




 
Wednesday, September 25, 2002

Campaign finance


Money should not cancel out anyone's vote

map
        The rich and powerful in America tend to be one and the same.

        Those with big bucks tend to bankroll politicians who'll keep them that way. Those with less cash, like me, get to use their votes and their voices, even though they don't resonate as loudly in Washington, Columbus or Frankfort, or even in City Hall.

        Some cynics I know say they don't vote or get involved in politics because their ballots won't count against the wiles and wills of the rich and powerful. Besides, they say, sometimes no candidate merits the minuscule endorsement that a single vote represents.

        I argue that if your vote is your only voice, why squander it? Too many people — I say this especially to black cynics — have died or suffered to make sure you could vote.

One vote vs. money

        But cynicism is hard to fight when the cynics are partly right.

        Too many elections feature only the best candidates money can buy, instead of an array of hopefuls. What candidate can afford to stand for the little guy when it takes big money to get his or her name out?

        Apathy almost makes sense, until I remember Fannie Lou Hamer.

        Granddaughter of a slave, daughter of a sharecropper, Ms. Hamer tried voting in Mississippi during the early 1960s. She wound up losing her home and farm job and attracting death threats and bullets. She was beaten and nearly blinded for encouraging other blacks to vote.

        Her fight for voters' rights gained national attention during the Democratic Party's presidential convention in 1964. Partly because of her efforts, President Lyndon B. Johnson signed the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which struck down states' use of poll taxes and tests to keep blacks from the polls.

        Her legacy isn't ancient history to me. I was a year old when she was beaten, 3 years old when the Voting Rights Act passed and 15 years old when she died in 1977.

        Last Saturday, a director of the Fannie Lou Hamer Project spoke to a voters group in Cincinnati. The national nonprofit tries to link civil rights groups to national and local efforts to reform election laws.

        The project supports bills like the Wellstone-Kerry “Clean Money, Clean Elections Act” (Senate Bill 117),which would limit campaign donations and allow greater public funding for politicians who eschew private campaign donors.

No strings attached

        A voluntary check-off on income-tax forms, similar to the current one, would send $5 to such candidates. The hope is that there would be enough for them to say “no” to money with strings attached, says Stephanie Wilson of the Fannie Lou Hamer project.

        Despite unfolding corporate scandals and revelations about how campaign funding encourages politicians to shield the crooks, the Clean Act still has no legs in the Senate.

        Locally, Cincinnati's new campaign reforms are under attack, too.

        Beginning with the 2003 election cycle, city council candidates who voluntarily limit campaign spending can get matching funds from the public: $2 for every $1 they raise.

        If they opt out, candidates can raise what they want, but each donation would be limited to $1,000 from individuals, $2,500 from political action committees and $10,000 from political parties.

        But these modest curbs will cost too much, says the Coalition Opposed to Additional Spending and Taxes (COAST), which placed on the November ballot Issue 8, which would repeal public funding of campaigns.

        COAST ads ask why tax dollars should fund “the clowns” in city government.

        Now that's cynicism.

        E-mail damos@enquirer.com or phone 768-8395

       

       



Urban housing choices broaden
Briefly on national stage, Patton now diminished
City labs will have role in biotesting
First tickets draw 30-day suspension
Anderson skating may get a boost
Input sought on school construction
Jorg not to blame for death, says examiner
Obituary: Vernon Watson, man of integrity
Ohio EPA hears opposition to expansion of Rumpke landfill
Suit seeks $25,000 in I-275 wrong-way collision
Tristate A.M. Report
UC welcomes pioneers from West High
BRONSON: Religious freedom
- SMITH-AMOS: Campaign finance
GUTIERREZ: Paul Patton
KORTE: City Hall
Ex-deputy gets 4-year sentence for rape
Prosecutor eludes debate on trustees
Reappraisal won't help Lakota much
Sixth-graders learn the basics
Suspect kept job after $16K missed
Affrilachian poets shine this weekend
Editorial writers address Patton affair
Hours extended for tax amnesty
Kentucky News Briefs
Newport bond rate improves
No suspect in Highlands threat
Patton reducing political activities
Some blame mine as Harlan stream runs dry
Two Louisville police officers charged with stealing cash

 

Latest Headline News
Updated Every 30 Minutes
AP TOP HEADLINE NEWS

Iraqi Official: 150,000 Civilians Dead

Sen. Allen Concedes Defeat in Virginia

Bush, Pelosi Hold White House Talks

Massive Recall of Acetaminophen Underway

Mubarak Warns Against Hanging Saddam

Bolton Unlikely to Win Senate Approval

AP: Startling Findings in Tillman Probe

Ed Bradley of '60 Minutes' Dies at 65

U.S. Rises in Auto Reliability Ratings

49ers Look to Relocate New Stadium



Cincinnati.Com
Search our site by keyword:  
Search also: News | Jobs | Homes | Cars | Classifieds | Obits | Coupons | Events | Dining
Movies/DVDs | Video Games | Hotels | Golf | Visitor's Guide | Maps/Directions | Yellow Pages

  CINCINNATI.COM  |  NKY.COM  |  ENQUIRER  |  CIN WEEKLY  |  Classifieds  |  Cars  |  Homes  |  Jobs  |  Help


Search | Questions/help | News tips | Letters to the editors | Subscribe
Newspaper advertising | Web advertising | Place a classified | Circulation

Copyright 1995-2007. The Cincinnati Enquirer, a Gannett Co. Inc. newspaper.
Use of this site signifies agreement to terms of service updated 12/19/2002.