By Liz Sidoti
The Associated Press
COLUMBUS - A man imprisoned for writing fictitious stories of child torture and molestation returned home Friday, two months after a state appeals court threw out his child pornography conviction.
Brian Dalton - believed to be the first person in the United States successfully prosecuted for child pornography for writings instead of images - remains on house arrest at his parents' home and can have no contact with minors, under terms of his release.
The stories, which prosecutors say were made up and never acted on, were about three children - ages 10 and 11 - being caged in a basement, molested and tortured. The journal was so disturbing that grand jurors asked a detective to stop reading after about two pages.
"He's happy to be home. He obviously hopes ultimately to be free," said Benson Wolman, one of Dalton's attorneys. Dalton declined interview requests through Wolman.
Wolman said Dalton will remain on house arrest until his case ends.
Prosecutors have asked the Ohio Supreme Court to hear an appeal of the 10th Ohio District Court of Appeals' July dismissal of Dalton's guilty plea to obscenity charges. The appeals court agreed with Dalton that he initially received poor legal assistance. The case was sent back to Franklin County Common Pleas Court for a retrial.
"We will be asking the Supreme Court not to exercise that discretion," Wolman said. "We believe the court of appeals got it right."
Judge David Cain of Franklin County ordered Dalton's release Wednesday.
Wolman and a team of American Civil Liberties Union lawyers have argued that Dalton, 24, was wrongfully imprisoned for what should have been constitutionally protected free speech or, in this case, writings.
Dalton, of Columbus, pleaded guilty in July 2001 to pandering obscenity involving a minor, which falls under Ohio's pornography law. He later asked to withdraw the plea so he could fight the constitutionality of the law, but Franklin County Common Pleas Judge Nodine Miller refused. ACLU attorneys then appealed.
Dalton had argued that his former trial lawyer didn't inform him of the legal implications of a guilty plea or ask for an immediate dismissal on First Amendment grounds.
SPECIAL REPORT: COLLISION COURSE
Brent Spence Bridge obsolete, dangerous
Do you drive the bridge? Rate the 'Fear Factor'
15 deficient bridges: How Brent Spence compares
Accident stats show big rigs get a bad rap
History of the bridge
Who was Brent Spence?
PULFER: Dana Siegel gets the glorious gift of a second wind
BRONSON: A soldier returns from WMDs to BMWs
CROWLEY: Broadsides continue over sub
GOOD THINGS: Students help teacher turn 100
Oktoberfest today: Chicken dancing
German teens rate Oktoberfest 'like McDonald's'
Man to put gun, debate in open
Tourism officials excited by sub
Poor urged to go to polls
Jury award criticized
More to Madeira fest than fun, games
Montgomery, Sycamore: The next section's for you
Post-game rowdiness raises concerns
Speed trailer slammed by speeder
Mason schools to seek bond issue
Fairfield to break ground on community arts center
Survey gives Miami low marks on diversity
Miami lines up big names for lecture series
Nancy Neumann promoted peace
John Peter owned Norwood cafeteria
Ohio Bicentennial Notebook
Policeman accused of church break-in
Man freed from prison in child pornography case
Accused Covington teacher identified
Tobacco debate frays nerves
Murder warrants issued in 3 slayings