Thursday, October 2, 2003

Talks to regulate tobacco industry break down along partisan lines



By Nancy Zuckerbrod
The Associated Press

WASHINGTON - Talks in Congress to regulate the tobacco industry broke down along partisan lines Wednesday, making it highly unlikely new restrictions would be imposed on the cigarette industry anytime soon.

Democrats and Republicans on the Senate health committee have been trying for months to negotiate a deal that would give the Food and Drug Administration oversight of cigarettes.

Late Wednesday, Sen. Judd Gregg, R-N.H., the chairman of the committee, sent Democrats a draft of what he said was his final legislative proposal.

But Democrats rejected the offer, saying it didn't go far enough.

"Unfortunately, the proposed legislation which Republicans put forth today falls far short of the strong FDA authority which is needed to effectively do the job," said Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., the leading Democrat on the health committee. "A weak bill is worse than no bill at all because it would give the public a false impression that their health was being protected."

Democrats and anti-smoking advocates said they were upset about a provision in Gregg's bill to require the FDA to consider whether changes it ordered could make legal cigarettes so unpleasant that smokers would stop buying them.

Gregg argued that the provision would keep smokers from turning to a black market to get unregulated cigarettes.

Other areas of disagreement include how far states should be able to go in setting their own restrictions on the industry and whether tobacco companies can be sued for failing to adequately warn people about smoking hazards.

This latest effort by lawmakers to regulate the tobacco industry was the most serious in years.

Tobacco-state lawmakers who previously opposed FDA regulation said they would support it in exchange for financial assistance for tobacco farmers.

Philip Morris USA, the nation's largest cigarette maker and a major campaign contributor, also reversed its previous position and endorsed FDA regulation.

Other tobacco companies opposed the idea, saying the new advertising restrictions would make it harder to compete with industry leader Philip Morris.

The FDA asserted authority over cigarettes in 1996, but the Supreme Court later ruled that only Congress can give the FDA that power.




TOP STORIES
Abuse suit now a class action
Zimpher gets busy on Day 1
Student sampling on new boss sketchy
Crime on rise in suburbs
Young voters missing at polls

IN THE TRISTATE
Character sign: helping a friend
Project to cut off businesses
19 from Greater Cincinnati are Achievement semifinalists
Cancer team seeks funding
Reeve tells of hope for cures
Cranley seeks I-71 exit near hospitals
Monitor says police reform is slow
MSD to pay to fix sewer backups
Regional Report

ENQUIRER COLUMNISTS
Pulfer: A new history of women begins on the west side
Howard: Good Things Happening

BUTLER, WARREN, CLERMONT
Jury decides on death penalty for man who killed his wife
Hamilton readies for assault of this winter
Deters advises Butler Co.
Miami U. to keep all benefits for striking workers
Visit Scotland with a trip to Middletown
Mason's pancake day will be Nov. 8
Condos argued in Price Hill
Student killed; school shocked

OBITUARIES
Stanley Kreimer active in politics
Henry Stark, 104, was in union for 87 years
Kentucky obituaries

OHIO
Irate farmer wants crop circle culprits to pay
Two firefighters killed in New Knoxville
No charges to be filed in landlord voyeurism case
Lawmaker proposes overhaul of state retirement fund boards
There's plenty of Ohio in D.C.
Ohio Moments

KENTUCKY
Universities, public schools start mutual campaign for money
Ky. state senator says: 'I'm gay'
Poll finds majority would allow smoking in bars
Survey: Gamblers ramble in region
Talks to regulate tobacco industry break down along partisan lines
Holmes teacher's death serves as warning for all
Museum Center shows Lewis and Clark letters
West Nile death confirmed
Truck driver dies after going off I-71