Saturday, October 11, 2003

Appellate court favors liquor option



By Bruce Schreiner
The Associated Press

LOUISVILLE - A law allowing local option elections for liquor sales at large restaurants in dry territory should apply to all cities and counties, the Kentucky Court of Appeals said Friday.

A three-judge panel reversed a lower court's ruling that denied a local option election in Corinth, a small town in Grant County. The panel returned the case to Grant County Circuit Court for further proceedings.

The case had been appealed by Anna Francis Dalton, who submitted a petition for a local option election to county officials in early 2002.

The petition had 59 valid signatures, enough to qualify for the ballot. However, the county judge-executive refused to set an election and was upheld by the circuit court.

A trial judge cited a section of the local option law that applies to fourth-class cities or counties containing such cities where a liquor ban is not in effect. Corinth is a sixth-class city.

The appeals court said such an interpretation creates an inconsistency with another section of the statute that says local option elections could apply to a city or county where alcohol is banned.

The law allows petitions for local option elections on alcohol sales at restaurants that seat more than 100 and derive at least 70 percent of their gross receipts from food sales.

Other sections of state law allow such local option elections in first- through fourth-class cities in dry counties.

In recent years, voters in several Kentucky communities have voted to legalize liquor sales at the large restaurants.

Chief Judge Tom Emberton, who wrote the appellate opinion, said the section of law in dispute was enacted to give cities other than those in the first four classes the right to vote on limited alcohol sales.

"The General Assembly obviously believed that these cities and counties also have economic needs that can be met by the limited sale of alcohol in otherwise dry territories," he wrote.

Emberton said the lower court erred in ruling that the disputed section does not apply to all cities and counties in Kentucky.

Joining in the opinion were Judge William McAnulty of Louisville and Senior Judge Joseph Huddleston of Bowling Green.




TOP STORIES
We're No. 1 - in airfare costs
How fares compare from CVG, other cities
Kids rewarded for showing up
Cardinal: Change will restore church
Writing on the wall for sculpture
'It's a sad end to a sad story'

IN THE TRISTATE
County workers threaten strike
Some in Norwood fight to sell homes
Spring Grove invites guests
Boy's suicide intensifies father's crusade
Marching band refuses to yield
Regional Report

ENQUIRER COLUMNISTS
Bronson: 'Married ... With Children' - not as seen on TV
Faith Matters: Educate yourself in Islam
Howard: Good Things Happening

BUTLER, WARREN, CLERMONT
Man gets death sentence in murder of wife
Man guilty in kidnap, assault attempt
County signs off on soldiers
Historical society runs contest
Corwin Nixon in poor health
Computer viruses bedevil Miami University systems

OBITUARIES
John Watson, Clermont judge, county organizer
Geneva L. Frederick, 80, was homemaker, ex-Marine
'Captain' Morton Chapman, 91, owned the Anchor Grill
Kentucky obituaries

OHIO
Publishers dusting off vintage comic characters
Radioactive reactor might be coming through Cincinnati
Soft mattress, dumplings greet soldier on vacation
Pension files get scrutiny
Man gets life term in pizza driver's murder
Safety becoming top priority for car buyers, experts report
Ohio Moments

KENTUCKY
Day-care owners quit amid inquiry into death
Lawyer caught in con's web
Gubernatorial hopefuls tangle in Bowling Green
Former Ky. Gov. Breathitt collapses
State Rep. Kerr switches to GOP
Appellate court favors liquor option
Ky. budget outlook brightens
Troopers to man checkpoints
Boone County zoning decision overturned
Kentucky News Briefs