Sunday, December 14, 2003

Natural gas giants drill fuel overseas


Shift helps small company, hits homeowner

By Brad Foss
The Associated Press

The U.S. natural gas industry is in the midst of a turbulent transformation as petroleum giants such as ChevronTexaco and ExxonMobil increasingly hunt fuel overseas, leaving smaller players scrambling to pick up the slack domestically.

The shift exacerbates an already constrained market in which supplies have been tight and prices high amid rapidly declining productivity in the nation's aging natural-gas fields, analysts and industry officials said.

Over the past two to three years, "there has been a major de-emphasis on the importance of exploration in this country" by the world's largest petroleum companies, said Rhone Resch, vice president of energy markets at the Natural Gas Supply Association, a Washington-based trade group. "That results in fewer new fields that are going to bring significant new supplies."

The transition has benefited smaller companies struggling to make up the difference as a result of high prices, boosting profits and stock prices. Yet it has come at the expense of homeowners and industrial users, who could see high energy bills for several more years.

Longer term, however, America will gain access to vast international supplies that should help ease the current crunch, analysts and executives said.

Exports to U.S.

Indeed, as the biggest players expand natural gas production in countries such as Indonesia, Nigeria, Qatar and Russia to boost reserves and please shareholders, they do so with the understanding that a significant portion will eventually be exported to America.

"That's what the future holds for natural gas," said Robert Ineson, a Houston-based director at Cambridge Energy Research Associates.

Trouble is, the United States has limited infrastructure to support the growing intercontinental trade for natural gas. To get it across oceans, the fuel must be cooled to its liquid state, shipped in refrigerated tankers and then "re-gasified," so it can be piped to homeowners, power plants and manufacturers.

There are just four U.S.-based terminals today that can receive tankers carrying liquefied natural gas, or LNG.

While roughly 30 new LNG terminals have been proposed and LNG imports are expected to quadruple by the end of the decade, it will be several years before substantial new capacity is added. Keeping up with rising demand will be tough, experts said.

Natural gas imports from Canada have been growing to compensate for the slide in U.S. productivity, but that safety net is gradually fraying, analysts said, because drillers there are also working harder every year just to keep output steady.

Today, the United States uses roughly 60 billion cubic feet of natural gas each day, with nearly 15 percent coming from Canada via pipeline and 2 percent from LNG. Demand for natural gas is expected to rise 14 percent by the end of the decade, according to Standard & Poors.

Ineson predicted there will be another "four to five years where things are going to be a little difficult."

With the price of natural gas soaring - January futures passed $7 per 1,000 cubic feet this past week - many companies are drilling aggressively.

Baker Hughes Inc., a Houston-based oil services firm, reported Dec. 5 that the number of rigs pursuing natural gas in the United States was up 38 percent from the year before. And that doesn't include the thousands of mom-and-pop operators, who are even more price sensitive, investing their limited resources in the nation's oldest and least productive wells.

Yet despite this surge in drilling, average daily production in the United States is on pace to decline by 2.8 percent in 2003, according to a Lehman Brothers analysis of 49 of the industry's biggest companies. Even the Energy Department estimate of 2 percent growth illustrates the magnitude of the struggle to boost output.

Less drilling, higher price

The reduced drilling activity by deep-pocketed and technologically superior companies such as BP, ExxonMobil, ChevronTexaco and Royal Dutch/Shell is an important factor, analysts and industry officials said.

"You wouldn't see production falling as much and you wouldn't see as much pressure on prices" if major petroleum companies were more active, said Marshall Adkins, an oil and gas analyst at Raymond James & Associates in Houston. That doesn't mean they would be able to reverse the trend, though, Adkins said.

Compared with last year, BP's natural gas production in the lower 48 states fell 13 percent, according to Lehman Brothers. ExxonMobil's was down 10 percent, ChevronTexaco's slipped 11 percent and Royal/Dutch Shell's declined by 15 percent.

The major petroleum companies began to migrate overseas in their hunt for natural gas.

"We'll go wherever the opportunities are," said Alan Stuckert, public affairs manager for ExxonMobil's gas and power marketing division. "If we could drill in certain areas of the U.S., we'd be there."



Look Who's Talking: Carol Zupancic
Pepper foresees two years at Yale
Queen City Rewind
All welcome in this place
'Don't hit reply on spam! No, wait, do hit reply!'
Tristate business notes
Prepare now for April 15
Want to own your business? Start out with a franchise
Old Thyme Herbs' growth only natural
Natural gas giants drill fuel overseas
Real or symbolic, 10,000 milestone has value