Tuesday, January 13, 2004

Loveland debate canceled


City, chamber object to civic group's format

By Sheila McLaughlin
The Cincinnati Enquirer

LOVELAND - A group that successfully sued the city to put a zoning referendum on the March ballot has canceled this week's pre-election debate, after city officials refused to participate.

David Miller, a leader in Voice of the Electorate (VOTE), also accused the Loveland Area Chamber of Commerce - which has publicly supported commercial zoning at the historic White Pillars site - of undermining VOTE's debate by planning its own.

City and chamber officials said they had concerns that VOTE's event would be one-sided. Miller said he was not surprised that city officials rejected the group's debate.

"This is not unexpected, I guess, for people who have spent so much of the community's resources in money and energy in their failed and illegal attempt to keep this issue off the ballot," Miller said.

VOTE sued Loveland officials in 2002 after the city refused to accept referendum petitions meant to overturn a zoning amendment that allowed properties of 5 acres or more to be rezoned to commercial even if they were next to residential neighborhoods.

The change, defended by Loveland officials as part of the Master Plan, paved the way for Hines-Griffin to buy the $3.4 million White Pillars site from the city and to develop it for residential and commercial use. After an appeals court sided with VOTE, and three council members were ousted, the city agreed to put the referendum on the ballot.

VOTE's debate was scheduled for 7:30 p.m. Wednesday at the Loveland Intermediate School media center. VOTE has changed the format to a community discussion, which is open to the public.

"In my opinion, they undermined their own efforts by not seeking the requirements from both sides for what each side would consider a fair and truthful debate," said Paulette Leeper, chamber executive director.

"They didn't do the footwork beforehand that is necessary to get two sides who are heatedly on opposing viewpoints to come together to agree to talk about it."

City manager Fred Enderle rejected VOTE's invitation, saying he wouldn't allow city staff to participate. He recommended that council stay out of it unless VOTE changed the rules.

Enderle questioned the group's control of the debate, its invitation to participants from outside Loveland and VOTE's use of the term "spot zoning" in promoting the forum.

Leeper said city officials have agreed to participate in the chamber's Feb. 18 debate, as have Paul Elliott and Todd Osborne, two new councilmen who were active in VOTE.

She stressed that the chamber's staff and board members will not actively participate in the debate because of the organization's support of White Pillars development.

---

E-mail smclaughlin@enquirer.com




ENQUIRER COLUMNISTS
Bronson: Kids, council need to do the right thing
Blackwell pushes for end to secret political accounts
Car buffs donate $50K to hospital

TOP LOCAL HEADLINES
Ohio wins new uranium plant
Dowlin refuses DeWine debate
Deal avoids primary battle
Lawyer asks out of church lawsuit
Public library doing more with less
Arrest led to deputy
Biographer to speak on 'soul' of pope
District loses commandments court battle
Man killed at bar's door
Builder's racketeering conviction upheld
Drug arrests follow probe of Cheviot bar

EDUCATION HEADLINES
Fantasy reading makes TV disappear
Principal wins slander suit
NKU foresees rise in tuition
Police say couple took sex photos of students
Sports commentator to speak at Moeller

NEIGHBORHOOD HEADLINES
Blighted area reawakens
Visits by 'Apple Lady' bear fruit for patients
Lakeside Park agrees to study merger with Crestview Hills
Loveland debate canceled
Mall tops list of Crestview Hills mayor's goals
Indian Hill relaxes cell-phone tower rule
Water compromise pondered
Computer training available in city

LIVES REMEMBERED
John Iden, ballet pianist