By Spencer Hunt
Enquirer Columbus Bureau
COLUMBUS - A lawyer defending a John Dowlin television ad that called Pat DeWine's conduct shameful said Thursday he was "shocked" when he first saw it.
"It is difficult. It is rough. It is a hard statement," attorney Jack Gregg Haught told the Ohio Elections Commission. "But tough statements are not against the law in America."
A three-member panel of the commission agreed. They voted 2-1 to dismiss DeWine's complaint that Hamilton County commissioner Dowlin's campaign violated state election law by airing the ad.
DeWine, a Cincinnati city councilman, is challenging Dowlin in the Republican primary for county commissioner. The election is Tuesday.
The commercial, which first appeared Feb. 16, accuses DeWine of flip-flopping on a multimillion-dollar city tax deal for Convergys Corp. DeWine had voted against a $63.4 million incentive plan in July. He supported a $52.2 million package two weeks later.
The commercial states: "DeWine left his wife and children for a Convergys lobbyist whose company received the tax breaks DeWine supported."
DeWine's attorney, Mark Landes, tried to show the commercial was inaccurate. But the law demands he also prove that Dowlin's team knew it was false and decided to run it anyway.
"Sadly, that's the case," Landes said. "The law says you can lie if you're stupid about it."
Haught insisted the ad was accurate. On certain disputed points of fact, he said, Dowlin and campaign manager Robert J. Fredericks believed they were accurate before the ad ran.
In one dispute, Landes said it was inaccurate to call DeWine "a deciding vote" on the Convergys deal because it passed on a 8-1 vote.
Haught said that part of the ad would only be inaccurate if it said DeWine was "the" deciding vote.
DeWine has acknowledged he is in a relationship with the unnamed woman in the ad. DeWine said earlier this month that he separated from his wife, Karen, in June 2002 and filed for divorce in April 2003.
Commissioners Warren Tyler and William Booth voted to dismiss the complaint. Catherine Cunningham, dissented. They offered no explanations for their votes.
E-mail shunt@enquirer.com
TOP STORIES
Applicants overrun colleges
Covington puts deal on table for Maisonette
Proposed Social Security cuts cause apprehension
Dowlin's campaign ad upheld
Complaint leads to diversity consultant
IN THE TRISTATE
Many hands make blankets to give away
Victim's friends charged in slaying, dismemberment
Raymond Walters hosts film festival
Filmmaker wants change
Man accused of trying to lure girls into his vehicle
Dems united in criticisms
Some area fish unsafe to eat
Counselors on hand after student killed
Deupree House, neighbors near expansion agreement
Local man not quite 'Millionaire'
Neighbors briefs
Police museum a dream that needs more money
Public safety briefs
Democrats agree: Get more jobs
Networking expo kicks off today
Republican operatives promised bonuses
House approves fetal-rights bill
ENQUIRER COLUMNISTS
Downs: Abstaining from 'Sex' already hurts
Bonfield: Quality care can make health costs go down
Good Things Happening
LIVES REMEMBERED
Robert Huenefeld owned sign firm
KENTUCKY STORIES
Bunning clarifies stance on bridges
Bush pit stop nets $1M
Bush protest crowd displays variety of issues
Repair crew keeps homes of low-income livable
Bellevue-Dayton may cut one fire job
Rejected project returns - larger
Covington job fair seeks fully qualified teachers