Cincinnati.Com
NKY.COM  |  ENQUIRER  |  CIN WEEKLY  |  Classifieds  |  Cars  |  Homes  |  Jobs  |  Help
Currently:
31°F
Flurries
Weather | Traffic
The Enquirer
HOME
NEWS
ENTERTAINMENT
SPORTS
REDS
BENGALS
LOCAL GUIDE
MULTIMEDIA
ARCHIVES
SEARCH
 
 TODAY'S ENQUIRER 
 Front Page 
 Local News 
 Sports 
 Business 
-- Editorials 
 Tempo 
 Home Style 
 Travel 
 Health 
 Technology 
 Weather 
 Back Issues 
 Search 
 Subscribe 

 SPORTS 
 Bearcats 
 Bengals 
 High School 
 Reds 
 Xavier 

 VIEWPOINTS 
 Jim Borgman 
 Columnists 
 Readers' views 

 ENTERTAINMENT 
 Movies 
 Dining 
 Horoscopes 
 Lottery Results 
 Local Events 
 Video Games 

 CINCINNATI.COM 
 Giveaways 
 Maps/Directions 
 Send an E-Postcard 
 Coupons 
 Visitor's Guide 

 CLASSIFIEDS 
 Jobs 
 Cars 
 Homes 
 Obituaries 
 General 
 Place an ad 

 HELP 
 Feedback 
 Subscribe 
 Search 
 Newsroom Directory 


  \
Wednesday, April 14, 2004

Detecting the next terror attack


Editorial

This week's blitz of 9-11 hearings, press conferences and high-level testimony circled back to FBI inadequacies in preventing terrorist attacks. In the midst of all this we should remember that our country's first objective should be how to prevent the next attack, not the last one.

One unmistakable conclusion from this week's hearings is that both the FBI and CIA need to speed up training and beef up staffing to professionalize U.S. counterterrorism units.

Monday, President Bush said now may be the time to revamp U.S. intelligence services. Critics accuse him of trying to shift blame onto U.S. intelligence agencies and away from his administration's failures before Sept. 11 and recent mistakes in Iraq. Whatever the motives, it's clear that although improvements have been made and the FBI and CIA are sharing more intelligence, major changes still are needed. National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice testified last week before the 9-11 panel: "The real lesson of Sept. 11 is that the country was not properly structured to deal with the threat that had been gathering for a long period of time."

Tuesday, a prepared statement by 9-11 investigators read like a multi-count indictment of FBI bureaucratic barriers that kept it from detecting the 9-11 plot and stopping it. The president, other Bush officials and members of Congress already are testing the political winds to see if a new stand-alone domestic intelligence agency like Britain's MI5 should be created or if a semi-autonomous division would be better within the FBI. Opponents of a MI5-type agency insist Americans would never stand for a "secret police." Congress should exercise great care if plans move in that direction.

The likelier result is a new division within the FBI, but the report on the FBI by 9-11 commission investigators should be required reading for all those contemplating yet another anti-terrorist center. The FBI before 9-11 did create several counterterrorism divisions, but they were sorely underfunded and regarded as the agency's "backwaters." The day before the Sept. 11 attack, Attorney General John Ashcroft rejected a budget request of an extra $50 million to hire more counterterrorism agents and intelligence specialists. After 9-11, the Bush administration not only created the mammoth new Homeland Security Department but also a new Terrorist Threat Integration Center at which FBI and CIA agents are supposed to work alongside Pentagon analysts.

On Sept. 11, 2001, only about 1,300 FBI agents, 6 percent of total personnel, worked on counterterrorism. The agency lacked strategic analysts who could see the bigger picture. The FBI's computer systems were antiquated, agents were promoted without training and policy barriers blocked information sharing. The undeniable conclusion: This nation still needs a crash program to gear up for protecting the home front in the war on terrorism.

---

CORRECTION

Carl Lindner originally gave $1.5 million toward the capital fund drive for the West End YMCA, and in March he gave another $1.5 million as an endowment for children to attend the facility. An incorrect figure was given on the "Making Life Better" feature on Monday's Opinions page.




EDITORIAL PAGE HEADLINES
Detecting the next terror attack
Keep those kindergarten options open
Hot air: Bush taxes logic
Air needn't be dangerous to be bad
Letters to the editor

 

Jim Borgman
Jim Borgman
Jim Borgman is The Cincinnati Enquirer's Pulitzer Prize winning editorial cartoonist.
Jim Borgman
 • Today's cartoon

 • Archive

 • Biography

 • Pulitzer Prize

 • 25th anniversary


Letters to the Editor
Use our online form to send a letter to the editor of The Cincinnati Enquirer.

Or mail to:
The Cincinnati Enquirer
Letters to the Editor
312 Elm Street
Cincinnati, OH 45202


Related Links
e the People
e.the People
is an online public forum. Think of it as the digital town hall for The Cincinnati Enquirer.


Cincinnati.Com
Search our site by keyword:  
Search also: News | Jobs | Homes | Cars | Classifieds | Obits | Coupons | Events | Dining
Movies/DVDs | Video Games | Hotels | Golf | Visitor's Guide | Maps/Directions | Yellow Pages

  CINCINNATI.COM  |  NKY.COM  |  ENQUIRER  |  CIN WEEKLY  |  Classifieds  |  Cars  |  Homes  |  Jobs  |  Help


Search | Questions/help | News tips | Letters to the editors | Subscribe
Newspaper advertising | Web advertising | Place a classified | Circulation

Copyright 1995-2007. The Cincinnati Enquirer, a Gannett Co. Inc. newspaper.
Use of this site signifies agreement to terms of service updated 12/19/2002.