Cincinnati.Com
NKY.COM  |  ENQUIRER  |  CIN WEEKLY  |  Classifieds  |  Cars  |  Homes  |  Jobs  |  Help
Currently:
80°F
Mostly Sunny
Weather | Traffic
The Enquirer
HOME
NEWS
ENTERTAINMENT
SPORTS
REDS
BENGALS
LOCAL GUIDE
MULTIMEDIA
ARCHIVES
SEARCH
 
 TODAY'S ENQUIRER 
 Front Page 
 Local News 
 Sports 
 Business 
-- Editorials 
 Tempo 
 Home Style 
 Travel 
 Health 
 Technology 
 Weather 
 Back Issues 
 Search 
 Subscribe 

 SPORTS 
 Bearcats 
 Bengals 
 High School 
 Reds 
 Xavier 

 VIEWPOINTS 
 Jim Borgman 
 Columnists 
 Readers' views 

 ENTERTAINMENT 
 Movies 
 Dining 
 Horoscopes 
 Lottery Results 
 Local Events 
 Video Games 

 CINCINNATI.COM 
 Giveaways 
 Maps/Directions 
 Send an E-Postcard 
 Coupons 
 Visitor's Guide 

 CLASSIFIEDS 
 Jobs 
 Cars 
 Homes 
 Obituaries 
 General 
 Place an ad 

 HELP 
 Feedback 
 Subscribe 
 Search 
 Newsroom Directory 


  \
Saturday, August 28, 2004

Applaud, analyze school success


Editorial

No one can nor should ignore Ohio schools' widespread improvement on the Local School Report Cards. It is heartening to see 13 local districts improve their ratings, 16 earn "excellent" designations, and student achievement rise in all grades tested across the state.

What is more heartening, however, is that there is order and method to this improvement. Schools aren't only doing better but apparently know why they're doing better and how to replicate it.

Doing the basics well

The job of improving public education in Ohio isn't finished, but it is clearly under way, and the reasons boil down to basic things, well done. The state has developed standards that, while not perfect, are generally seen as more rigorous and growing stronger, and schools have gotten serious about aligning their curricula to those standards.

Schools have become far more sensible about tracking their progress, relying more heavily on data to determine what students are learning, who's not learning and how to fill in the gaps. Finally, schools are putting more resources into early intervention rather than waiting to remediate.

Those efforts make sense, and we applaud them. But are there cautions along the way? Absolutely.

The strength of test-driven standardization is that it sets goals and measures progress. Ohio has come a long way in articulating what it wants students to know and be able to do, and if they've mastered it. But when state curricula and state tests carry that much weight - when they are driving learning to that extent - states must keep revisiting the question of whether they are measuring the right things.

So how do they know? One way is to concentrate on critical thinking skills - the ability to reason, analyze, make decisions, arrive at sound conclusions - rather than simply the acquisition of information. Ohio's proficiency tests and the new Ohio Graduation Test do focus on those skills, but there are other measures as well.

More good signs needed

If Ohio students are really doing better in things that count, we could expect to see some increase in composite SAT and ACT scores (although they're affected by how many students take the exams) or Advanced Placement exams, perhaps more National Merit designees, or better performance on other achievement tests. It would help to know if fewer graduates need remediation in college, for example, or if more are applying at more rigorous colleges.

The indicators can vary, but the point is, if achievement is climbing substantially, signs of it should be breaking out all over.

But, quantifiable progress aside, we must admit everything good can't be summed up in a number. When we ask how Ohio students are doing, we should also mean: are they happy? Are teachers and parents still seeing creativity? Are children learning to work together, serve others, have a passion for something?

We admit we don't know how to communicate those things on a Local Report Card, but we do know they matter. Excellent schools not only instruct, they inspire.



EDITORIAL PAGE HEADLINES
Applaud, analyze school success
Main Street bazaar a new urban treat
How we see it: Winners and losers
What might frozen embryos say?
Letters to the editor



 

Jim Borgman
Jim Borgman
Jim Borgman is The Cincinnati Enquirer's Pulitzer Prize winning editorial cartoonist.
Jim Borgman
 • Today's cartoon

 • Archive

 • Biography

 • Pulitzer Prize

 • 25th anniversary


Letters to the Editor
Use our online form to send a letter to the editor of The Cincinnati Enquirer.

Or mail to:
The Cincinnati Enquirer
Letters to the Editor
312 Elm Street
Cincinnati, OH 45202


Related Links
e the People
e.the People
is an online public forum. Think of it as the digital town hall for The Cincinnati Enquirer.


Cincinnati.Com
Search our site by keyword:  
Search also: News | Jobs | Homes | Cars | Classifieds | Obits | Coupons | Events | Dining
Movies/DVDs | Video Games | Hotels | Golf | Visitor's Guide | Maps/Directions | Yellow Pages

  CINCINNATI.COM  |  NKY.COM  |  ENQUIRER  |  CIN WEEKLY  |  Classifieds  |  Cars  |  Homes  |  Jobs  |  Help


Search | Questions/help | News tips | Letters to the editors | Subscribe
Newspaper advertising | Web advertising | Place a classified | Circulation

Copyright 1995-2007. The Cincinnati Enquirer, a Gannett Co. Inc. newspaper.
Use of this site signifies agreement to terms of service updated 12/19/2002.