Friday, September 17, 2004

Group disputes petition validity


Marriage-ban foes file suit

By Jim Siegel
Enquirer Columbus Bureau

COLUMBUS - Opponents trying to keep a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage off the Ohio ballot want a state appeals court to invalidate all signatures gathered in Hamilton and Cuyahoga counties.

The Cincinnati-based Campaign to Protect Marriage must collect 323,000 valid signatures to put the issue before voters in November. But a coalition of gay rights advocates could block the effort by tying it up in court or getting enough signatures tossed out.

A lawsuit filed this week in the state 10th District Court of Appeals argues that all petitions collected in the Cincinnati and Cleveland areas should be tossed out for a variety of reasons, including the fact that they do not contain a required summary of the amendment.

The amendment effort is already expected to come up at least 17,000 signatures short of the state requirement - a figure supporters think they can overcome by submitting more than 100,000 additional signatures.

But if the lawsuit is successful, it could eliminate more than 50,000 valid signatures from Hamilton and Cuyahoga counties, significantly increasing the signature deficit.

Donald McTigue, an election law attorney hired by opponents, said the lawsuit also names the secretary of state's office as a defendant in hopes that a ruling in his favor could invalidate signatures in all counties.

David Langdon, author of the amendment and attorney for the Campaign to Protect Marriage, called the lawsuit a "Hail Mary with no merit to it."

"They waited too long," he said, adding that such a challenge should have been brought forward when petitions were first submitted to the secretary of state's office in early August.

McTigue disagrees and will plead his case before a three-judge panel in Columbus on Monday.

McTigue also has filed legal challenges to petitions in 42 counties.

While most are pending, challenges in Hamilton and Washington counties have been dismissed. Amendment opponents won their challenge in Logan County, getting about 1,700 signatures tossed out.

The amendment would ban gay marriage, end domestic partner benefits offered by four state universities, and could affect legal agreements between unmarried couples.

E-mail jsiegel@enquirer.com




ELECTION 2004
Minor parties, major ambition
Edwards attacks Bush's record on economy, Iraq

TOP LOCAL HEADLINES
Feds tighten airport screening
Islet cell transplants on hold
Cincinnati cops nearly done with CPR update
Locals lend hand to victims of storms
Senators hear doctors' complaints about costs
Relative takes up fight for justice
Fire union lists ways to save
Group disputes petition validity
Driver who killed woman sentenced to three years
Ex-cop faces trial in wife's '95 death
Once again, teens mourn loss of peer to car wreck
What's recyclable? A lot more items

KENTUCKY HEADLINES
N.Ky. counts its successes
Gay man cheers arrest in case
Maysville celebrates retaining newspaper
Kentucky news briefs
Kentucky obituaries

EDUCATION
School music makes comeback
1-day walkout may be voted
Fairfield faces academic cuts if levy fails again
Shell asked to help district

NEIGHBORS
Neighborhood briefs

ENQUIRER COLUMNS
Downs: Don't make P. Diddy beg; vote, you kids
Good Things Happening

LIVES REMEMBERED
Gordon Brisker, musician and master teacher

BIG WEEKEND
City embraces jam-packed Fusion
Wanna party? Sports, music, Oktoberfest await
Best places to eat
What's new downtown, on riverfront
Big events fill the weekend
Downtown event map (PDF)
More Big Weekend coverage