Cincinnati.Com
NKY.COM  |  ENQUIRER  |  CIN WEEKLY  |  Classifieds  |  Cars  |  Homes  |  Jobs  |  Help
Currently:
34°F
Cloudy
Weather | Traffic
The Enquirer
HOME
NEWS
ENTERTAINMENT
SPORTS
REDS
BENGALS
LOCAL GUIDE
MULTIMEDIA
ARCHIVES
SEARCH
 
 TODAY'S ENQUIRER 
 Front Page 
 Local News 
 Sports 
-- Business 
 Editorials 
 Tempo 
 Home Style 
 Travel 
 Health 
 Technology 
 Weather 
 Back Issues 
 Search 
 Subscribe 

 SPORTS 
 Bearcats 
 Bengals 
 High School 
 Reds 
 Xavier 

 VIEWPOINTS 
 Jim Borgman 
 Columnists 
 Readers' views 

 ENTERTAINMENT 
 Movies 
 Dining 
 Horoscopes 
 Lottery Results 
 Local Events 
 Video Games 

 CINCINNATI.COM 
 Giveaways 
 Maps/Directions 
 Send an E-Postcard 
 Coupons 
 Visitor's Guide 
 Web Directory 

 CLASSIFIEDS 
 Jobs 
 Cars 
 Homes 
 General 
 Place an ad 

 HELP 
 Feedback 
 Subscribe 
 Search 
 Newsroom Directory 



 
Friday, October 1, 2004

CG&E rejects electric- rate deal



By Mike Boyer
Enquirers staff writer

Cincinnati Gas & Electric will appeal the changes made by state regulators to its plan to begin raising electric rates starting next year.

The Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (PUCO) modified a tentative agreement the unit of Cinergy Corp. reached in May with a dozen business and consumer groups.

"Unfortunately, the PUCO's required changes would result in a fundamentally different deal," said Greg Ficke, CG&E president.

In a unanimous decision Wednesday, the five-member commission said CG&E, whose electric rates have been frozen since 1994, would have to justify any residential rate increase when the rate freeze is slated to end in 2006.

The tentative settlement reached in May would have allowed CG&E to increase rates up to 6 percent annually, without prior commission approval, to recover increases in fuel, environmental costs, security and other items.

The commission also modified portions of the agreement dealing with non-residential electric rates, which will be unfrozen starting in January.

The company has 30 days to ask the commission to reconsider its decision.

Ohio Consumers' Counsel Janine Migden-Ostrander, who represents consumers before the commission, also plans to ask the PUCO to reconsider. She said neither the original order nor the PUCO decision were good for consumers.

If still not satisfied with the results of the rehearing, the commission's decision can be appealed to the Ohio Supreme Court.

As result of the commission's decision, CG&E said it was considering whether to go to a market-based rate scheme. The commission hasn't set rules for market-based rates.

Email mboyer@enquirer.com




BUSINESS HEADLINES
MLS Web site to end listings
Airline to be under more scrutiny
Kentucky company says rival ripped off doggie doo-doo glove
P&G's brush likened to floss
Business summary
Pharmacists tell patients to stop taking their Vioxx
Competition holds line on insurance
Gloomy guidance trims Milacron shares 3%
Hurricane losses mount for insurers
Some answers about Vioxx
Business digest
CG&E rejects electric- rate deal
Pharmacists seek to add paid-consultant services
Businesswomen talk borrowing



 

Latest Headline News
Updated Every 30 Minutes
BUSINESS NEWS

U.S. Rises in Auto Reliability Ratings

Congolese Shun Own Currency for Dollars

Delta Air Lines Posts $52M Profit in 3Q

Prepared Holiday Meals Up in Popularity

Christmas Returns to Wal-Mart Marketing


Cincinnati.Com
Search our site by keyword:  
Search also: News | Jobs | Homes | Cars | Classifieds | Obits | Coupons | Events | Dining
Movies/DVDs | Video Games | Hotels | Golf | Visitor's Guide | Maps/Directions | Yellow Pages

  CINCINNATI.COM  |  NKY.COM  |  ENQUIRER  |  CIN WEEKLY  |  Classifieds  |  Cars  |  Homes  |  Jobs  |  Help


Search | Questions/help | News tips | Letters to the editors | Subscribe
Newspaper advertising | Web advertising | Place a classified | Circulation

Copyright 1995-2007. The Cincinnati Enquirer, a Gannett Co. Inc. newspaper.
Use of this site signifies agreement to terms of service updated 12/19/2002.