Cincinnati.Com
NKY.COM  |  ENQUIRER  |  CIN WEEKLY  |  Classifieds  |  Cars  |  Homes  |  Jobs  |  Help
Currently:
58°F
Cloudy
Weather | Traffic
The Enquirer
HOME
NEWS
ENTERTAINMENT
SPORTS
REDS
BENGALS
LOCAL GUIDE
MULTIMEDIA
ARCHIVES
SEARCH
 
 TODAY'S ENQUIRER 
 Front Page 
 Local News 
 Sports 
-- Business 
 Editorials 
 Tempo 
 Home Style 
 Travel 
 Health 
 Technology 
 Weather 
 Back Issues 
 Search 
 Subscribe 

 SPORTS 
 Bearcats 
 Bengals 
 High School 
 Reds 
 Xavier 

 VIEWPOINTS 
 Jim Borgman 
 Columnists 
 Readers' views 

 ENTERTAINMENT 
 Movies 
 Dining 
 Horoscopes 
 Lottery Results 
 Local Events 
 Video Games 

 CINCINNATI.COM 
 Giveaways 
 Maps/Directions 
 Send an E-Postcard 
 Coupons 
 Visitor's Guide 
 Web Directory 

 CLASSIFIEDS 
 Jobs 
 Cars 
 Homes 
 General 
 Place an ad 

 HELP 
 Feedback 
 Subscribe 
 Search 
 Newsroom Directory 



 
Sunday, October 17, 2004

Could tobacco firms pay out $280 billion?


Government seeks it in fraud case; cigarette makers say they'll fold

By Stephanie Stoughton
and Paul Nowell
The Associated Press

RICHMOND, Va. - Big tobacco companies have already agreed to pay $246 billion to settle states' suits against them. Now, at a civil racketeering trial in Washington, the Justice Department is seeking $280 billion from cigarette makers, charging them with defrauding the public about the health risks of smoking.

What if the government wins its case?

Tobacco executives and their lawyers, who believe the government has overstepped its bounds, predict U.S. District Judge Gladys Kessler won't hobble the firms by ordering another huge payout in the nonjury trial she's presiding over and that's expected to last well into 2005.

As the industry is quick to note, it has undergone significant change in the past decade, adding youth smoking prevention programs and operating under stricter rules. In the late 1990s, it agreed to the $246 billion payment to settle suits filed by multiple states over health care costs. The agreements also forced the companies to alter their practices.

"Those are irreversible changes that are the best indication of how we'll do business in the future," said Peggy Roberts, a spokeswoman for industry leader Philip Morris USA, the subsidiary of Altria Group Inc. that relocated from New York to Richmond.

Still, what if the companies lose? Although the companies say they're confident of victory, they also say a defeat would put them out of business.

Since the trial started Sept. 21, government lawyers have produced witnesses who have accused the companies of manipulating nicotine levels and failing to make their products safer despite having the knowledge to do so.

Former Philip Morris scientist William Farone testified Oct. 6 that the companies put aside ideas for safer cigarettes because any move to put them on the market would be an admission that existing brands were harmful.

To hear the industry tell it, the result of an adverse court decision would be simple. "If we lose, we all go bankrupt and the federal government will own all the tobacco companies," said Seth Moskowitz, a spokesman for Reynolds American Inc., created through the merger this summer of R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. and Brown & Williamson Tobacco Co., and second in size only to Philip Morris USA.

Critics and legal experts, however, say such a drastic outcome is unlikely. They contend the defendant companies - R.J. Reynolds, Brown & Williamson, British American Tobacco Ltd., Lorillard Tobacco Co., Liggett Group Inc. and Philip Morris USA and its parent Altria Group - are likely to settle if they sense defeat. And if they do, the landmark Master Settlement Agreement with states six years ago provides a road map for their survival, according to these experts.

"If this settlement is structured like the MSA, it's highly likely it will be passed on to smokers through higher prices, which means the industry won't suffer as much," said Jonathan Gruber, an MIT professor of public finance who plans to testify for the federal government at the Washington trial.

The master settlement limited the financial damage by allowing the companies to make annual, volume-based payments over 25 years. The industry passed on most of the costs through wholesale price increases that contributed to a rise in the retail price of a pack of cigarettes by more than $1.50 a pack.




BUSINESS HEADLINES
Farmers swimming in soybeans, corn
Look Who's Talking: Pierre Fabre
P&G alumnus talks turf battles
Business notes
Eckberg: Ownership new to many employees
Telemarketers adjust to do-not-call list
Power plants lose steam here
Alternative minimum tax fix put off
Could tobacco firms pay out $280 billion?
Who wins with the winner?



 

Latest Headline News
Updated Every 30 Minutes
BUSINESS NEWS

U.S. Rises in Auto Reliability Ratings

Congolese Shun Own Currency for Dollars

Delta Air Lines Posts $52M Profit in 3Q

Prepared Holiday Meals Up in Popularity

Christmas Returns to Wal-Mart Marketing


Cincinnati.Com
Search our site by keyword:  
Search also: News | Jobs | Homes | Cars | Classifieds | Obits | Coupons | Events | Dining
Movies/DVDs | Video Games | Hotels | Golf | Visitor's Guide | Maps/Directions | Yellow Pages

  CINCINNATI.COM  |  NKY.COM  |  ENQUIRER  |  CIN WEEKLY  |  Classifieds  |  Cars  |  Homes  |  Jobs  |  Help


Search | Questions/help | News tips | Letters to the editors | Subscribe
Newspaper advertising | Web advertising | Place a classified | Circulation

Copyright 1995-2007. The Cincinnati Enquirer, a Gannett Co. Inc. newspaper.
Use of this site signifies agreement to terms of service updated 12/19/2002.