Sunday, October 24, 2004

Would smoking ban singe business?



By Matt Leingang
Enquirer staff writer

After almost two months of work, a 30-member panel studying a potential smoking ban in Cincinnati plans to complete its report by late November.

The panel appears to agree that breathing secondhand smoke poses increased health risks. But members disagree sharply over the potential economic impact of banning smoking at bars, restaurants, bowling alleys and bingo parlors.

Smoking-ban opponents predict disaster, citing informal surveys from business owners. They fear that businesses might be forced to close or lay off employees because of drops in revenue.

Smoking ban supporters, who include members of the American Lung Association and American Cancer Society in Cincinnati, say those claims are exaggerated. They point to strong sales tax data from U.S. cities that already have smoking bans. They say a smoking ban is a workplace safety issue.

Nationwide, more than 1,700 cities and 10 states have comprehensive clean indoor air legislation, according to the American Nonsmokers' Rights Foundation in Berkeley, Calif.

In Cincinnati, the two sides might have to strike a compromise - perhaps a neutral statement declaring that a smoking ban will have an impact on the hospitality industry but avoids judging the effect to be positive or negative, panel members said.

Despite the panel's polarization, talks have been cordial, and members have made significant progress, said Bobbie Sterne, the panel's co-chairwoman.

"We're not really quarrelling about the health side of things anymore," Sterne said. "It's trying to determine what the economic impact will be."

Tom Ford, co-owner of Murphy's Pub in Clifton Heights, agreed.

"Nobody's going to argue that secondhand smoke is good for you, but a ban is something that will make it tough for small businesses," Ford said.

The panel's report is due to City Council by year's end, but there's no guarantee that council will vote on the issue this year.

Mayor Charlie Luken has told health advocates that he is wary of Cincinnati sticking its neck out on this issue. He said he fears that a smoking ban will put city businesses at a competitive disadvantage with Northern Kentucky and surrounding Ohio suburbs, although there's no marketing data to support that claim.

E-mail mleingang@enquirer.com




SPECIAL REPORT: HEALTH INSURANCE
Tailored plans a high-fee stopgap
Workers bracing for insurance shock
Exec's tough call: Covering his family
Doing what's right loses out to costs
Rising fees eclipse prescription needs
Family does without, praying they'll get by
Subsidized coverage key, Springer says

ELECTION 2004
Ohio:
Campaign foot soldiers work to get out the vote
Appeals court decision: Vote in your precinct
GOP drops voter challenges
Integrity Hall has hosted many campaigners
Election boards prepare for it all as vote day nears
Campaign calendar
Kentucky:
Clooney's Kentucky roots, fame vs. Davis' business background
Some candidates want voters to split ticket
Mall key issue in city race
Three-way race for judge divides county
Open letter latest attack on Yoder
Poll: Bunning lead shrinking

Election 2004 page

TOP STORIES
Men defy stereotype, find joy in teaching
Thousands help better our region
Queen City's grand old flag best in Ohio; Louisville is tops in Ky.

IN THE TRISTATE
Krohn shows off after $3M remodeling
Tutor needed to grasp school funding?
Forum on public records law Wednesday
Would smoking ban singe business?
Public safety

ENQUIRER COLUMNISTS
Crowley: No accounting for missteps in Senate race
Bronson: I keep getting telephone calls from nut jobs
Good Things Happening

LIVES REMEMBERED
Helyn Mae Hehl's strength inspired
Letitia O'Neil studied integration

KENTUCKY STORIES
Newport's 150 years of firefighting
Northern Kentucky News in Brief
'Warmth' shelter seeks money
Mustang kicks up its heels