By Jim Siegel
Enquirer Columbus Bureau

COLUMBUS—Gov. Bob Taft today joined some fellow Republican elected officials in opposing a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage and benefits for unmarried couples.

Calling it unnecessary, overly broad, and potentially harmful to the state's economy, Taft said Ohio is already protected against recognizing gay marriages performed here or in other states.

"It is an ambiguous invitation to litigation that will result in unintended consequences for senior citizens and for any two persons who share living accommodations," Taft said in a statement.

"The ambiguity and breadth of Issue 1 will make it more difficult for us to retain and attract the young talented knowledge workers we need to advance Ohio's prosperity in the 21st century."

Taft delayed weighing in on state Issue 1 until his legal team reviewed the potential ramifications of the amendment.

Attorney General Jim Petro, and U.S. Sens. Mike DeWine and George Voinovich have each voiced opposition to the measure, criticizing it as too vague and potentially harmful to the state's economy.

Nationwide Insurance this week also came out in opposition to the amendment, joining The Limited Group among large corporations urging the defeat of Issue 1. Other opponents include the AARP, League of Women Voters, Ohio State University and several large-city mayors.

State Auditor Betty Montgomery and Secretary of State Ken Blackwell are supporting the amendment, which bans gay marriage and forbids a legal status for unmarried individuals "that intends to approximate the design, qualities, significance or effect of marriage."

Ohio's Catholic bishops also have expressed support.

Taft argued the proposal goes into "uncharted waters," where there will be as many interpretations of the amendment "as there are judges in the state of Ohio."